Melanie R Meister1, Nishkala Shivakumar2, Siobhan Sutcliffe3, Theresa Spitznagle4, Jerry L Lowder5. 1. Division of Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University in St. Louis, St Louis, MO. Electronic address: meisterm@wustl.edu. 2. Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO. 3. Division of Public Health Sciences, Department of Surgery, Washington University in St. Louis, St Louis, MO. 4. Department of Physical Therapy, Washington University in St. Louis, St Louis, MO. 5. Division of Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University in St. Louis, St Louis, MO.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Myofascial pain is characterized by the presence of trigger points, tenderness to palpation, and local or referred pain, and commonly involves the pelvic floor muscles in men and women. Pelvic floor myofascial pain in the absence of local or referred pain has also been observed in patients with lower urinary tract symptoms, and we have found that many patients report an improvement in these symptoms after receiving myofascial-targeted pelvic floor physical therapy. OBJECTIVE: We sought to systematically review the literature for examination techniques used to assess pelvic floor myofascial pain in women. STUDY DESIGN: We performed a systematic literature search using strategies for the concepts of pelvic floor disorders, myofascial pain, and diagnosis in Ovid MEDLINE 1946-, Embase 1947-, Scopus 1960-, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects, and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. Articles were screened by 3 authors and included if they contained a description of a pelvic myofascial physical examination. RESULTS: In all, 55 studies met our inclusion criteria. Overall, examination components varied significantly among the included studies and were frequently undefined. A consensus examination guideline was developed based on the available data and includes use of a single digit (62%, 34/55) to perform transvaginal palpation (75%, 41/55) of the levator ani (87%, 48/55) and obturator internus (45%, 25/55) muscles with a patient-reported scale to assess the level of pain to palpation (51%, 28/55). CONCLUSION: Physical examination methods to evaluate pelvic musculature for presence of myofascial pain varied significantly and were often undefined. Given the known role of pelvic floor myofascial pain in chronic pelvic pain and link between pelvic floor myofascial pain and lower urinary tract symptoms, physicians should be trained to evaluate for pelvic floor myofascial pain as part of their physical examination in patients presenting with these symptoms. Therefore, the development and standardization of a reliable and reproducible examination is needed.
BACKGROUND:Myofascial pain is characterized by the presence of trigger points, tenderness to palpation, and local or referred pain, and commonly involves the pelvic floor muscles in men and women. Pelvic floor myofascial pain in the absence of local or referred pain has also been observed in patients with lower urinary tract symptoms, and we have found that many patients report an improvement in these symptoms after receiving myofascial-targeted pelvic floor physical therapy. OBJECTIVE: We sought to systematically review the literature for examination techniques used to assess pelvic floor myofascial pain in women. STUDY DESIGN: We performed a systematic literature search using strategies for the concepts of pelvic floor disorders, myofascial pain, and diagnosis in Ovid MEDLINE 1946-, Embase 1947-, Scopus 1960-, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects, and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. Articles were screened by 3 authors and included if they contained a description of a pelvic myofascial physical examination. RESULTS: In all, 55 studies met our inclusion criteria. Overall, examination components varied significantly among the included studies and were frequently undefined. A consensus examination guideline was developed based on the available data and includes use of a single digit (62%, 34/55) to perform transvaginal palpation (75%, 41/55) of the levator ani (87%, 48/55) and obturator internus (45%, 25/55) muscles with a patient-reported scale to assess the level of pain to palpation (51%, 28/55). CONCLUSION: Physical examination methods to evaluate pelvic musculature for presence of myofascial pain varied significantly and were often undefined. Given the known role of pelvic floor myofascial pain in chronic pelvic pain and link between pelvic floor myofascial pain and lower urinary tract symptoms, physicians should be trained to evaluate for pelvic floor myofascial pain as part of their physical examination in patients presenting with these symptoms. Therefore, the development and standardization of a reliable and reproducible examination is needed.
Authors: Mary Lourdes Lima de Souza Montenegro; Elaine Cristine Mateus-Vasconcelos; Francisco José Candido dos Reis; Júlio César Rosa e Silva; Antonio Alberto Nogueira; Omero Benedicto Poli Neto Journal: J Eval Clin Pract Date: 2010-10 Impact factor: 2.431
Authors: Colleen M Fitzgerald; Cynthia E Neville; Trudy Mallinson; Suzanne A Badillo; Christina K Hynes; Frank F Tu Journal: J Reprod Med Date: 2011 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 0.142
Authors: Emma E Bendaña; James M Belarmino; Jenny H Dinh; Cynthia L Cook; Brian P Murray; Paul J Feustel; Elise J B De Journal: Urol Nurs Date: 2009 May-Jun
Authors: Frank F Tu; Colleen M Fitzgerald; Todd Kuiken; Todd Farrell; R Norman Harden; Harden R Norman Journal: Obstet Gynecol Date: 2007-12 Impact factor: 7.661
Authors: Tatiana V D Sanses; Gisela Chelimsky; Noel P McCabe; Denniz Zolnoun; Jeffrey Janata; Robert Elston; C A Tony Buffington; Pippa Simpson; Liyun Zhang; Thomas Chelimsky Journal: Clin J Pain Date: 2016-08 Impact factor: 3.442
Authors: Melanie R Meister; Siobhan Sutcliffe; Chiara Ghetti; Christine M Chu; Theresa Spitznagle; David K Warren; Jerry L Lowder Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2018-12-07 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: Vy T Phan; Pamela Stratton; Hannah K Tandon; Ninet Sinaii; Jacqueline V Aredo; Barbara I Karp; Melissa A Merideth; Jay P Shah Journal: Eur J Pain Date: 2021-01-08 Impact factor: 3.651
Authors: Patricia J Mwesigwa; Nicholas J Jackson; Ashley T Caron; Falisha Kanji; James E Ackerman; Jessica R Webb; Victoria C S Scott; Karyn S Eilber; David M Underhill; Jennifer T Anger; A Lenore Ackerman Journal: Front Pain Res (Lausanne) Date: 2021-11-05
Authors: Supuni C Kapurubandara; Basia Lowes; Ursula M Sansom-Daly; Rebecca Deans; Jason A Abbott Journal: Int Urogynecol J Date: 2022-07-07 Impact factor: 1.932