Vy T Phan1, Pamela Stratton2, Hannah K Tandon1, Ninet Sinaii3, Jacqueline V Aredo4, Barbara I Karp2, Melissa A Merideth5, Jay P Shah1. 1. Rehabilitation Medicine Department, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA. 2. Office of the Clinical Director, Intramural Research Program, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA. 3. Biostatistics & Clinical Epidemiology Service, Intramural Research Program, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA. 4. Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA. 5. Office of the Clinical Director, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Chronic pelvic pain persists in some women with endometriosis even after lesion removal and optimized hormonal treatment. OBJECTIVE: Characterize the presence and distribution of pain, myofascial dysfunction and sensitisation beyond the pelvis in women with endometriosis-associated chronic pelvic pain. METHODS: Cross-sectional study of 30 women prior to participation in a clinical trial. Evaluation included pain-focused abdominopelvic gynaecologic examination with the identification of pelvic floor muscle spasm. Neuro-musculoskeletal examination assessed paraspinal allodynia and hyperalgesia bilaterally and myofascial trigger points in 13 paired muscles. Pressure-pain thresholds were measured over interspinous ligaments and trigger points. Women completed the body territories element of the Body Pain Index. RESULTS: All women had a pelvic floor muscle spasm that they self-identified as a major focus of pain. Twenty of 30 women described their pelvic pain as focal. However, all demonstrated widespread myofascial dysfunction with low pressure-pain thresholds and trigger points in over two-thirds of 26 assessed regions. Widespread spinal segmental sensitisation was present in 17/30, thoracic in 21/30 and lumbosacral/pelvic in 18/30. Cervical sensitisation manifested as low pressure-pain thresholds with 23/30 also reporting recurrent, severe headaches and 21/30 experiencing orofacial pain. Those reporting diffuse pelvic pain were more likely to have widespread (p = .024) and lumbosacral/pelvic (p = .036) sensitisation and report over 10 painful body areas (p = .009). CONCLUSIONS: Women with endometriosis-associated chronic pelvic pain often have myofascial dysfunction and sensitisation beyond the pelvic region that may be initiated or maintained by on-going pelvic floor spasm. These myofascial and nervous system manifestations warrant consideration when managing pain in this population. Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT01553201. SIGNIFICANCE: Women with endometriosis often have pelvic pain persisting after surgery despite hormonal therapies and these women have regional pelvic sensitisation and myofascial dysfunction. Pelvic floor muscle spasm is a major pain focus in this population. Sensitisation and myofascial dysfunction are widespread, beyond the pelvic region. On-going pelvic floor spasm may initiate or maintain sensitisation. Myofascial/sensitisation manifestations warrant consideration when managing pain in this population.
BACKGROUND: Chronic pelvic pain persists in some women with endometriosis even after lesion removal and optimized hormonal treatment. OBJECTIVE: Characterize the presence and distribution of pain, myofascial dysfunction and sensitisation beyond the pelvis in women with endometriosis-associated chronic pelvic pain. METHODS: Cross-sectional study of 30 women prior to participation in a clinical trial. Evaluation included pain-focused abdominopelvic gynaecologic examination with the identification of pelvic floor muscle spasm. Neuro-musculoskeletal examination assessed paraspinal allodynia and hyperalgesia bilaterally and myofascial trigger points in 13 paired muscles. Pressure-pain thresholds were measured over interspinous ligaments and trigger points. Women completed the body territories element of the Body Pain Index. RESULTS: All women had a pelvic floor muscle spasm that they self-identified as a major focus of pain. Twenty of 30 women described their pelvic pain as focal. However, all demonstrated widespread myofascial dysfunction with low pressure-pain thresholds and trigger points in over two-thirds of 26 assessed regions. Widespread spinal segmental sensitisation was present in 17/30, thoracic in 21/30 and lumbosacral/pelvic in 18/30. Cervical sensitisation manifested as low pressure-pain thresholds with 23/30 also reporting recurrent, severe headaches and 21/30 experiencing orofacial pain. Those reporting diffuse pelvic pain were more likely to have widespread (p = .024) and lumbosacral/pelvic (p = .036) sensitisation and report over 10 painful body areas (p = .009). CONCLUSIONS: Women with endometriosis-associated chronic pelvic pain often have myofascial dysfunction and sensitisation beyond the pelvic region that may be initiated or maintained by on-going pelvic floor spasm. These myofascial and nervous system manifestations warrant consideration when managing pain in this population. Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT01553201. SIGNIFICANCE: Women with endometriosis often have pelvic pain persisting after surgery despite hormonal therapies and these women have regional pelvic sensitisation and myofascial dysfunction. Pelvic floor muscle spasm is a major pain focus in this population. Sensitisation and myofascial dysfunction are widespread, beyond the pelvic region. On-going pelvic floor spasm may initiate or maintain sensitisation. Myofascial/sensitisation manifestations warrant consideration when managing pain in this population.
Authors: Jacqueline V Aredo; Katrina J Heyrana; Barbara I Karp; Jay P Shah; Pamela Stratton Journal: Semin Reprod Med Date: 2017-01-03 Impact factor: 1.303
Authors: Brett D McKinnon; Dominic Bertschi; Nick A Bersinger; Michael D Mueller Journal: Trends Endocrinol Metab Date: 2014-11-19 Impact factor: 12.015
Authors: Supuni C Kapurubandara; Basia Lowes; Ursula M Sansom-Daly; Rebecca Deans; Jason A Abbott Journal: Int Urogynecol J Date: 2022-07-07 Impact factor: 1.932
Authors: Amy L Shafrir; Elena Martel; Stacey A Missmer; Daniel J Clauw; Steven E Harte; Sawsan As-Sanie; Christine B Sieberg Journal: Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol Date: 2021-07-22 Impact factor: 2.831