Melanie R Meister1, Siobhan Sutcliffe2, Chiara Ghetti3, Christine M Chu3, Theresa Spitznagle4, David K Warren5, Jerry L Lowder3. 1. Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Division of Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery, Washington University in St. Louis, MO. Electronic address: meisterm@wustl.edu. 2. Department of Surgery, Division of Public Health Sciences, Washington University in St. Louis, MO. 3. Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Division of Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery, Washington University in St. Louis, MO. 4. Department of Physical Therapy, Washington University in St. Louis, MO. 5. Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, Washington University in St. Louis, MO.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Pelvic floor myofascial pain is common, but physical examination methods to assess pelvic floor muscles are defined poorly. We hypothesized that a simple, transvaginal pelvic floor examination could be developed that would be highly reproducible among providers and would adequately screen for the presence of pelvic floor myofascial pain. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to develop a simple, reproducible pelvic floor examination to screen for pelvic floor myofascial pain. STUDY DESIGN: A screening examination was developed by Female Pelvic Medicine & Reconstructive Surgery subspecialists and women's health physical therapists at our institution and tested in a simulated patient. We recruited 35 new patients who underwent examinations by blinded, paired, independent examiners. Agreement was calculated with the use of percent agreement and Spearman's rank correlation coefficient. RESULTS: The final examination protocol begins with examination of the following external sites: bilateral sacroiliac joints, medial edge of the anterior superior iliac spine, and cephalad edge of the pubic symphysis (self-reported pain: yes/no). The internal examination follows with palpation of each muscle group in the center of the muscle belly, then along the length of the muscle proceeding counter-clockwise: right obturator internus, right levator ani, left levator ani, left obturator internus (pain on a scale of 0-10). Thirty-five patients were enrolled. Correlation was high at each external (0.80-0.89) and internal point (0.63-0.87; P<.0001). CONCLUSION: Our newly developed, standardized, reproducible examination incorporates assessment of internal and external points to screen for pelvic floor myofascial pain. The examination is straightforward and reproducible and allows for easy use in clinical practice.
BACKGROUND:Pelvic floor myofascial pain is common, but physical examination methods to assess pelvic floor muscles are defined poorly. We hypothesized that a simple, transvaginal pelvic floor examination could be developed that would be highly reproducible among providers and would adequately screen for the presence of pelvic floor myofascial pain. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to develop a simple, reproducible pelvic floor examination to screen for pelvic floor myofascial pain. STUDY DESIGN: A screening examination was developed by Female Pelvic Medicine & Reconstructive Surgery subspecialists and women's health physical therapists at our institution and tested in a simulated patient. We recruited 35 new patients who underwent examinations by blinded, paired, independent examiners. Agreement was calculated with the use of percent agreement and Spearman's rank correlation coefficient. RESULTS: The final examination protocol begins with examination of the following external sites: bilateral sacroiliac joints, medial edge of the anterior superior iliac spine, and cephalad edge of the pubic symphysis (self-reported pain: yes/no). The internal examination follows with palpation of each muscle group in the center of the muscle belly, then along the length of the muscle proceeding counter-clockwise: right obturator internus, right levator ani, left levator ani, left obturator internus (pain on a scale of 0-10). Thirty-five patients were enrolled. Correlation was high at each external (0.80-0.89) and internal point (0.63-0.87; P<.0001). CONCLUSION: Our newly developed, standardized, reproducible examination incorporates assessment of internal and external points to screen for pelvic floor myofascial pain. The examination is straightforward and reproducible and allows for easy use in clinical practice.
Authors: Paul A Harris; Robert Taylor; Robert Thielke; Jonathon Payne; Nathaniel Gonzalez; Jose G Conde Journal: J Biomed Inform Date: 2008-09-30 Impact factor: 6.317
Authors: Kim W M van Delft; Abdul H Sultan; Ranee Thakar; S Abbas Shobeiri; Kirsten B Kluivers Journal: Int Urogynecol J Date: 2014-05-24 Impact factor: 2.894
Authors: Georgine Lamvu; Ruby H N Nguyen; Lara J Burrows; Andrea Rapkin; Kathryn Witzeman; Richard P Marvel; David Hutchins; Steven S Witkin; Christin Veasley; Roger Fillingim; Denniz Zolnoun Journal: J Reprod Med Date: 2015 May-Jun Impact factor: 0.142
Authors: Kenneth M Peters; Donna J Carrico; Scott E Kalinowski; Ibrahim A Ibrahim; Ananias C Diokno Journal: Urology Date: 2007-07 Impact factor: 2.649
Authors: Tatiana V D Sanses; Gisela Chelimsky; Noel P McCabe; Denniz Zolnoun; Jeffrey Janata; Robert Elston; C A Tony Buffington; Pippa Simpson; Liyun Zhang; Thomas Chelimsky Journal: Clin J Pain Date: 2016-08 Impact factor: 3.442
Authors: Melanie R Meister; Siobhan Sutcliffe; Chiara Ghetti; Christine M Chu; Theresa M Spitznagle; Jerry L Lowder Journal: Int Urogynecol J Date: 2022-09-20 Impact factor: 1.932
Authors: Supuni C Kapurubandara; Basia Lowes; Ursula M Sansom-Daly; Rebecca Deans; Jason A Abbott Journal: Int Urogynecol J Date: 2022-07-07 Impact factor: 1.932
Authors: Stefanie N Foster; Theresa M Spitznagle; Lori J Tuttle; Siobhan Sutcliffe; Karen Steger-May; Jerry L Lowder; Melanie R Meister; Chiara Ghetti; Jinli Wang; Michael J Mueller; Marcie Harris-Hayes Journal: J Womens Health Phys Therap Date: 2021 Jul-Sep