Literature DB >> 29959755

Dynamic models of choice.

Andrew Heathcote1, Yi-Shin Lin2, Angus Reynolds2, Luke Strickland2, Matthew Gretton2, Dora Matzke3.   

Abstract

Parameter estimation in evidence-accumulation models of choice response times is demanding of both the data and the user. We outline how to fit evidence-accumulation models using the flexible, open-source, R-based Dynamic Models of Choice (DMC) software. DMC provides a hands-on introduction to the Bayesian implementation of two popular evidence-accumulation models: the diffusion decision model (DDM) and the linear ballistic accumulator (LBA). It enables individual and hierarchical estimation, as well as assessment of the quality of a model's parameter estimates and descriptive accuracy. First, we introduce the basic concepts of Bayesian parameter estimation, guiding the reader through a simple DDM analysis. We then illustrate the challenges of fitting evidence-accumulation models using a set of LBA analyses. We emphasize best practices in modeling and discuss the importance of parameter- and model-recovery simulations, exploring the strengths and weaknesses of models in different experimental designs and parameter regions. We also demonstrate how DMC can be used to model complex cognitive processes, using as an example a race model of the stop-signal paradigm, which is used to measure inhibitory ability. We illustrate the flexibility of DMC by extending this model to account for mixtures of cognitive processes resulting from attention failures. We then guide the reader through the practical details of a Bayesian hierarchical analysis, from specifying priors to obtaining posterior distributions that encapsulate what has been learned from the data. Finally, we illustrate how the Bayesian approach leads to a quantitatively cumulative science, showing how to use posterior distributions to specify priors that can be used to inform the analysis of future experiments.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bayesian estimation; Diffusion decison model; Linear ballistic accumulator; Response time; Stop-signal paradigm

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 29959755     DOI: 10.3758/s13428-018-1067-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Res Methods        ISSN: 1554-351X


  23 in total

1.  A cognitive model-based approach to testing mechanistic explanations for neuropsychological decrements during tobacco abstinence.

Authors:  Alexander Weigard; Cynthia Huang-Pollock; Andrew Heathcote; Larry Hawk; Nicolas J Schlienz
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2018-09-04       Impact factor: 4.530

2.  A spurious correlation between difference scores in evidence-accumulation model parameters.

Authors:  James A Grange; Stefanie Schuch
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2022-09-22

3.  Mind Wandering Impedes Response Inhibition by Affecting the Triggering of the Inhibitory Process.

Authors:  Sumitash Jana; Adam R Aron
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2022-06-14

Review 4.  Partial response electromyography as a marker of action stopping.

Authors:  Liisa Raud; Christina Thunberg; René J Huster
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2022-05-26       Impact factor: 8.713

5.  A Single Mechanism for Global and Selective Response Inhibition under the Influence of Motor Preparation.

Authors:  Liisa Raud; René J Huster; Richard B Ivry; Ludovica Labruna; Mari S Messel; Ian Greenhouse
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-09-14       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Likelihood approximation networks (LANs) for fast inference of simulation models in cognitive neuroscience.

Authors:  Alexander Fengler; Lakshmi N Govindarajan; Tony Chen; Michael J Frank
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2021-04-06       Impact factor: 8.140

7.  A new model of decision processing in instrumental learning tasks.

Authors:  Steven Miletić; Russell J Boag; Anne C Trutti; Niek Stevenson; Birte U Forstmann; Andrew Heathcote
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2021-01-27       Impact factor: 8.140

8.  A cognitive model of response omissions in distraction paradigms.

Authors:  Karlye A M Damaso; Spencer C Castro; Juanita Todd; David L Strayer; Alexander Provost; Dora Matzke; Andrew Heathcote
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2021-12-23

Review 9.  Modeling the influence of working memory, reinforcement, and action uncertainty on reaction time and choice during instrumental learning.

Authors:  Samuel D McDougle; Anne G E Collins
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2021-02

10.  Cognitive Control of Working Memory: A Model-Based Approach.

Authors:  Russell J Boag; Niek Stevenson; Roel van Dooren; Anne C Trutti; Zsuzsika Sjoerds; Birte U Forstmann
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2021-05-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.