Xiao-Dong Zhang1, Zhong-Hua Li2, Zhi-Sheng Wu2, Wen Lin2, Wen-Ji Lin3, Jin-Chao Lin2, Li-Ming Zhuang2. 1. Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Quanzhou First Hospital Affiliated to Fujian Medical Univercity, An Ji Road, Fengze District, Quanzhou, 362000, Fujian, People's Republic of China. happy_zxd123@163.com. 2. Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Quanzhou First Hospital Affiliated to Fujian Medical Univercity, An Ji Road, Fengze District, Quanzhou, 362000, Fujian, People's Republic of China. 3. Department of Image, Quanzhou First Hospital Affiliated to Fujian Medical Univercity, Quanzhou, Fuzhou, Fujian, People's Republic of China.
Abstract
PURPOSE: A novel precision three-dimensional (3D)-printed paranasal sinus-skull base anatomical model was generated with a commercial grade desktop 3D printer. A specific page-turning pattern was employed in this model, to display the internal spatial structure of the paranasal sinus. METHODS: The CT image data of paranasal sinus were imported into the Mimics software to construct a 3D digital paranasal sinus-skull base model. Then, the model was sliced in the coronal position and loaded into the 3D printer to print each slice of the paranasal sinus-skull base model at a ratio of 1:1 in size. Based on CT image data, nine senior doctors assessed the simulation and accuracy of the anatomical structure features of the paranasal sinus-skull base, and the advantages and educational value of the 3D printing model using a seven-point Likert scale. RESULTS: A life-like 3D paranasal sinus-skull base structural model was successfully printed, with its internal spatial details clearly displayed. Nine senior doctors all thought that the profile of the printed anatomical structure was similar to that displayed by CT scan; however, the model provided more 3D spatial visual information. In addition, the model was considered to be of great value in the anatomy teaching and complicated surgery of the paranasal sinus-skull base, which had a material cost of only 3 dollars. CONCLUSIONS: The 3D printed paranasal sinus-skull base model has 3D visual functions, which provides a novel tool for anatomical studies on paranasal sinus, resident training, pre-surgical education and surgical planning.
PURPOSE: A novel precision three-dimensional (3D)-printed paranasal sinus-skull base anatomical model was generated with a commercial grade desktop 3D printer. A specific page-turning pattern was employed in this model, to display the internal spatial structure of the paranasal sinus. METHODS: The CT image data of paranasal sinus were imported into the Mimics software to construct a 3D digital paranasal sinus-skull base model. Then, the model was sliced in the coronal position and loaded into the 3D printer to print each slice of the paranasal sinus-skull base model at a ratio of 1:1 in size. Based on CT image data, nine senior doctors assessed the simulation and accuracy of the anatomical structure features of the paranasal sinus-skull base, and the advantages and educational value of the 3D printing model using a seven-point Likert scale. RESULTS: A life-like 3D paranasal sinus-skull base structural model was successfully printed, with its internal spatial details clearly displayed. Nine senior doctors all thought that the profile of the printed anatomical structure was similar to that displayed by CT scan; however, the model provided more 3D spatial visual information. In addition, the model was considered to be of great value in the anatomy teaching and complicated surgery of the paranasal sinus-skull base, which had a material cost of only 3 dollars. CONCLUSIONS: The 3D printed paranasal sinus-skull base model has 3D visual functions, which provides a novel tool for anatomical studies on paranasal sinus, resident training, pre-surgical education and surgical planning.
Keywords:
3D Printing; Education; Paranasal sinus; Surgery; Training
Authors: Austin S Rose; Julia S Kimbell; Caroline E Webster; Ola L A Harrysson; Eric J Formeister; Craig A Buchman Journal: Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Date: 2015-02-06 Impact factor: 1.547
Authors: Trevor D Crafts; Susan E Ellsperman; Todd J Wannemuehler; Travis D Bellicchi; Taha Z Shipchandler; Avinash V Mantravadi Journal: Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg Date: 2016-11-15 Impact factor: 3.497
Authors: Jayesh P Thawani; Jared M Pisapia; Nickpreet Singh; Dmitriy Petrov; James M Schuster; Robert W Hurst; Eric L Zager; Bryan A Pukenas Journal: World Neurosurg Date: 2016-04-07 Impact factor: 2.104
Authors: Jordan B Hochman; Charlotte Rhodes; Dana Wong; Jay Kraut; Justyn Pisa; Bertram Unger Journal: Laryngoscope Date: 2015-08-08 Impact factor: 3.325