Jon-Patrick Allem1, Likhit Dharmapuri2, Jennifer B Unger3, Tess Boley Cruz3. 1. Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90033, USA. Electronic address: allem@usc.edu. 2. Department of Computer Science, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA. 3. Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90033, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: As vaping rapidly becomes more prevalent, social media data can be harnessed to capture individuals' discussions of e-cigarette products quickly. The JUUL vaporizer is the latest advancement in e-cigarette technology, which delivers nicotine to the user from a device that is the size and shape of a thumb drive. Despite JUUL's growing popularity, little research has been conducted on JUUL. Here we utilized Twitter data to determine the public's early experiences with JUUL describing topics of posts. METHODS: Twitter posts containing the term "JUUL" were obtained for 1 April 2107 to 14 December 2017. Text classifiers were used to identify topics in posts (n = 81,689). RESULTS: The most prevalent topic wasPerson Tagging (use of @username to tag someone in a post) at 20.48% followed by Pods (mentions of JUUL's refill cartridge) at 14.72% and Buying (mentions of purchases) at 10.49%. The topic School (posts indicative of using JUUL or seeing someone use JUUL while at elementary, middle, or high school) comprised 3.66% of posts. The topic of Quit Smoking was rare at 0.29%. CONCLUSIONS: Data from social media may be used to extend the surveillance of newly introduced vaping products. Findings suggest Twitter users are bonding around, and inquiring about, JUUL on social media. JUUL's discreetness may facilitate its use in places where vaping is prohibited. Educators may be in need of training on how to identify JUUL in the classroom. Despite JUUL's branding as a smoking alternative, very few Twitter users mentioned smoking cessation with JUUL.
BACKGROUND: As vaping rapidly becomes more prevalent, social media data can be harnessed to capture individuals' discussions of e-cigarette products quickly. The JUUL vaporizer is the latest advancement in e-cigarette technology, which delivers nicotine to the user from a device that is the size and shape of a thumb drive. Despite JUUL's growing popularity, little research has been conducted on JUUL. Here we utilized Twitter data to determine the public's early experiences with JUUL describing topics of posts. METHODS: Twitter posts containing the term "JUUL" were obtained for 1 April 2107 to 14 December 2017. Text classifiers were used to identify topics in posts (n = 81,689). RESULTS: The most prevalent topic wasPerson Tagging (use of @username to tag someone in a post) at 20.48% followed by Pods (mentions of JUUL's refill cartridge) at 14.72% and Buying (mentions of purchases) at 10.49%. The topic School (posts indicative of using JUUL or seeing someone use JUUL while at elementary, middle, or high school) comprised 3.66% of posts. The topic of Quit Smoking was rare at 0.29%. CONCLUSIONS: Data from social media may be used to extend the surveillance of newly introduced vaping products. Findings suggest Twitter users are bonding around, and inquiring about, JUUL on social media. JUUL's discreetness may facilitate its use in places where vaping is prohibited. Educators may be in need of training on how to identify JUUL in the classroom. Despite JUUL's branding as a smoking alternative, very few Twitter users mentioned smoking cessation with JUUL.
Authors: John W Ayers; Eric C Leas; Mark Dredze; Jon-Patrick Allem; Jurek G Grabowski; Linda Hill Journal: JAMA Intern Med Date: 2016-12-01 Impact factor: 21.873
Authors: Jon-Patrick Allem; Patricia Escobedo; Kar-Hai Chu; Daniel W Soto; Tess Boley Cruz; Jennifer B Unger Journal: Tob Control Date: 2016-03-08 Impact factor: 7.552
Authors: Tushar Singh; René A Arrazola; Catherine G Corey; Corinne G Husten; Linda J Neff; David M Homa; Brian A King Journal: MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep Date: 2016-04-15 Impact factor: 17.586
Authors: Eric C Leas; Benjamin M Althouse; Mark Dredze; Nick Obradovich; James H Fowler; Seth M Noar; Jon-Patrick Allem; John W Ayers Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-08-02 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Kar-Hai Chu; Jennifer B Unger; Jon-Patrick Allem; Monica Pattarroyo; Daniel Soto; Tess Boley Cruz; Haodong Yang; Ling Jiang; Christopher C Yang Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-12-18 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Annice E Kim; Robert Chew; Michael Wenger; Margaret Cress; Thomas Bukowski; Matthew Farrelly; Elizabeth Hair Journal: JAMA Pediatr Date: 2019-07-01 Impact factor: 16.193
Authors: Asti Jackson; Grace Kong; Ran Wu; Meghan E Morean; Danielle R Davis; Deepa R Camenga; Dana A Cavallo; Krysten W Bold; Patricia Simon; Suchitra Krishnan-Sarin Journal: Addict Behav Date: 2020-06-21 Impact factor: 3.913
Authors: Andrea C Villanti; Shelly Naud; Julia C West; Jennifer L Pearson; Olivia A Wackowski; Elizabeth Hair; Raymond S Niaura; Jessica M Rath Journal: Prev Med Date: 2020-10-15 Impact factor: 4.018
Authors: Eleanor L S Leavens; Elise M Stevens; Emma I Brett; Thad R Leffingwell; Theodore L Wagener Journal: Addict Behav Date: 2019-07-09 Impact factor: 3.913
Authors: Suchitra Krishnan-Sarin; Asti Jackson; Meghan Morean; Grace Kong; Krysten W Bold; Deepa R Camenga; Dana A Cavallo; Patricia Simon; Ran Wu Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2018-11-15 Impact factor: 4.492