Literature DB >> 30818072

Using electronic audience response technology to track e-cigarette habits among college freshmen.

Jessica L Bourdon1, Linda C Hancock2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The use of e-cigarette devices, specifically JUUL, is on the rise on college campuses. Traditional means of collecting and analyzing research may not be fast enough for health professionals to effectively assess, plan, and implement effective prevention/intervention strategies. PROCEDURES: In August 2018, during incoming student orientation sessions at seven different college campuses, data was collected on a specific e-cigarette, JUUL. Data on use and knowledge of JUUL, as well as traditional cigarette use, was collected via immediate electronic audience response devices. Analyses included calculating descriptive statistics for questions of interest.
RESULTS: Because response on each item was optional and anonymous, participation on specific questions varied and the total sample size for the questions of interest ranged from 1940 to 2027 students. Mean daily use rates were 13.7% (11.6-18.0%) for JUUL and 1.7% (1.3-2.5%) for cigarettes. Most students (67.3%) knew that JUUL always contained nicotine (38.4-84.5%), although 30.1% believed that it just contained nicotine and/or flavored vapor (15.5-50.0%), and 2.1% thought it was flavored vapor only (0.0-5.9%).
CONCLUSIONS: This study reports the highest daily use of e-cigarettes among college students in the literature to date, with past-month e-cigarette use and daily cigarette use on par with previous estimates. Findings also highlight the knowledge gaps that some users have about JUUL specifically. In order for college health educators and professionals to best help students, adoption of methods that allow for more rapid assessment of e-cigarette trends is needed. This will help campuses more effectively address this issue, closing the research-to-practice gap in college health.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  College students; E-cigarette; JUUL; Prevention

Year:  2019        PMID: 30818072      PMCID: PMC6545149          DOI: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2019.02.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Addict Behav        ISSN: 0306-4603            Impact factor:   3.913


  11 in total

1.  Comparing electronic-keypad responses to paper-and-pencil questionnaires in group assessments of alcohol consumption and related attitudes.

Authors:  Joseph LaBrie; Mitch Earleywine; Toby Lamb; Kristin Shelesky
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  2006-04-19       Impact factor: 3.913

2.  Characterizing JUUL-related posts on Twitter.

Authors:  Jon-Patrick Allem; Likhit Dharmapuri; Jennifer B Unger; Tess Boley Cruz
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2018-06-23       Impact factor: 4.492

3.  Risky behaviors, e-cigarette use and susceptibility of use among college students.

Authors:  M L Saddleson; L T Kozlowski; G A Giovino; L W Hawk; J M Murphy; M G MacLean; M L Goniewicz; G G Homish; B H Wrotniak; M C Mahoney
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2015-01-24       Impact factor: 4.492

4.  High exposure to nicotine among adolescents who use Juul and other vape pod systems ('pods').

Authors:  Maciej Lukasz Goniewicz; Rachel Boykan; Catherine R Messina; Alison Eliscu; Jonatan Tolentino
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2018-09-07       Impact factor: 7.552

5.  Managing nicotine without smoke to save lives now: Evidence for harm minimization.

Authors:  David B Abrams; Allison M Glasser; Andrea C Villanti; Jennifer L Pearson; Shyanika Rose; Raymond S Niaura
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2018-06-23       Impact factor: 4.018

6.  Recognition, use and perceptions of JUUL among youth and young adults.

Authors:  Jeffrey G Willett; Morgane Bennett; Elizabeth C Hair; Haijuan Xiao; Marisa S Greenberg; Emily Harvey; Jennifer Cantrell; Donna Vallone
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2018-04-18       Impact factor: 7.552

7.  Patterns of electronic cigarette use and user beliefs about their safety and benefits: an internet survey.

Authors:  Maciej L Goniewicz; Elena O Lingas; Peter Hajek
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Rev       Date:  2012-09-20

8.  Electronic cigarette use by college students.

Authors:  Erin L Sutfin; Thomas P McCoy; Holly E R Morrell; Bettina B Hoeppner; Mark Wolfson
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2013-06-07       Impact factor: 4.492

9.  Disentangling Within- and Between-Person Effects of Shared Risk Factors on E-cigarette and Cigarette Use Trajectories From Late Adolescence to Young Adulthood.

Authors:  Michael S Dunbar; Jordan P Davis; Anthony Rodriguez; Joan S Tucker; Rachana Seelam; Elizabeth J D'Amico
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2019-09-19       Impact factor: 4.244

10.  Current Cigarette Smoking Among Adults - United States, 2016.

Authors:  Ahmed Jamal; Elyse Phillips; Andrea S Gentzke; David M Homa; Stephen D Babb; Brian A King; Linda J Neff
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  2018-01-19       Impact factor: 17.586

View more
  2 in total

1.  Youth and Young Adult Use of Pod-Based Electronic Cigarettes From 2015 to 2019: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Stella Juhyun Lee; Vaughan W Rees; Noam Yossefy; Karen M Emmons; Andy S L Tan
Journal:  JAMA Pediatr       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 16.193

2.  How and Why California Young Adults Are Using Different Brands of Pod-Type Electronic Cigarettes in 2019: Implications for Researchers and Regulators.

Authors:  Karma McKelvey; Bonnie Halpern-Felsher
Journal:  J Adolesc Health       Date:  2020-03-16       Impact factor: 5.012

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.