BACKGROUND: Social media present opportunities for public health departments to galvanise interest in health issues. A challenge is creating content that will resonate with target audiences, and determining reactions to educational material. Twitter can be used as a real-time surveillance system to capture individuals' immediate reactions to education campaigns and such information could lead to better campaigns in the future. A case study testing Twitter's potential presented itself when the California Department of Public Health launched its 'Still Blowing Smoke' media campaign about the potential harmful effects of e-cigarettes. Pro-e-cigarette advocacy groups, in response, launched a counter campaign titled 'Not Blowing Smoke'. This study tracked the popularity of the two campaigns on Twitter, analysed the content of the messages and determined who was involved in these discussions. METHODS: The study period was from 22 March 2015 to 27 June 2015. A stratified sampling procedure supplied 2192 tweets for analysis. Content analysis identified pro, anti and neutral e-cigarette tweets, and five additional themes: Marketing Elements, Money, Regulation/propaganda, Health, and Other. Metadata were analysed to obtain additional information about Twitter accounts. RESULTS: 'Not Blowing Smoke' was referenced more frequently than 'Still Blowing Smoke' on Twitter. Messages commonly objected to government regulation of e-cigarettes, refuted claims that e-cigarette manufactures were aligned with big tobacco, and touted the health benefits of e-cigarette use. E-cigarette companies and vape shops used campaign slogans to communicate with customers on Twitter. CONCLUSIONS: Findings showed the time dynamics of Twitter and the possibility for real-time monitoring of education campaigns. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/.
BACKGROUND: Social media present opportunities for public health departments to galvanise interest in health issues. A challenge is creating content that will resonate with target audiences, and determining reactions to educational material. Twitter can be used as a real-time surveillance system to capture individuals' immediate reactions to education campaigns and such information could lead to better campaigns in the future. A case study testing Twitter's potential presented itself when the California Department of Public Health launched its 'Still Blowing Smoke' media campaign about the potential harmful effects of e-cigarettes. Pro-e-cigarette advocacy groups, in response, launched a counter campaign titled 'Not Blowing Smoke'. This study tracked the popularity of the two campaigns on Twitter, analysed the content of the messages and determined who was involved in these discussions. METHODS: The study period was from 22 March 2015 to 27 June 2015. A stratified sampling procedure supplied 2192 tweets for analysis. Content analysis identified pro, anti and neutral e-cigarette tweets, and five additional themes: Marketing Elements, Money, Regulation/propaganda, Health, and Other. Metadata were analysed to obtain additional information about Twitter accounts. RESULTS: 'Not Blowing Smoke' was referenced more frequently than 'Still Blowing Smoke' on Twitter. Messages commonly objected to government regulation of e-cigarettes, refuted claims that e-cigarette manufactures were aligned with big tobacco, and touted the health benefits of e-cigarette use. E-cigarette companies and vape shops used campaign slogans to communicate with customers on Twitter. CONCLUSIONS: Findings showed the time dynamics of Twitter and the possibility for real-time monitoring of education campaigns. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/.
Entities:
Keywords:
Electronic nicotine delivery devices; Media; Surveillance and monitoring
Authors: Benjamin M Althouse; Jon-Patrick Allem; Matthew A Childers; Mark Dredze; John W Ayers Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2014-02 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: John W Ayers; Benjamin M Althouse; Jon-Patrick Allem; Daniel E Ford; Kurt M Ribisl; Joanna E Cohen Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2012-05-28 Impact factor: 5.428
Authors: Jenine K Harris; Sarah Moreland-Russell; Bechara Choucair; Raed Mansour; Mackenzie Staub; Kendall Simmons Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2014-10-16 Impact factor: 5.428
Authors: Jason B Colditz; Kar-Hai Chu; Sherry L Emery; Chandler R Larkin; A Everette James; Joel Welling; Brian A Primack Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2018-06-21 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Allison M Glasser; Lauren Collins; Jennifer L Pearson; Haneen Abudayyeh; Raymond S Niaura; David B Abrams; Andrea C Villanti Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2016-11-30 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Kar-Hai Chu; Jason B Colditz; Brian A Primack; Ariel Shensa; Jon-Patrick Allem; Elizabeth Miller; Jennifer B Unger; Tess Boley Cruz Journal: J Adolesc Health Date: 2018-11 Impact factor: 5.012
Authors: Patricia Escobedo; Tess Boley Cruz; Kai-Ya Tsai; Jon-Patrick Allem; Daniel W Soto; Matthew G Kirkpatrick; Monica Pattarroyo; Jennifer B Unger Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2018-09-25 Impact factor: 4.244