BACKGROUND: Anastomotic leak is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in gastrointestinal surgery. The serosal aspect of staple lines is commonly observed for integrity, but the mucosal surface and state of mucosa after firing is less often inspected. We sought to assess the degree of mucosal capture when using stapling devices and determine whether incomplete capture influences staple line integrity. METHODS: Porcine ileum was transected in vivo and staple lines were collected and rated for degree of mucosal capture on a 5-point scale from 1 (mucosa mainly captured on both sides) to 5 (majority of mucosa not captured). Mucosal capture was also assessed in ex vivo staple lines, and fluid leakage pressure and location of first leak was assessed. Stapling devices studied were Echelon Flex GST with 60-mm blue (GST60B) and green (GST60G) cartridges, and Medtronic EndoGIA Universal with Tri-Staple Technology™ with 60 mm medium (EGIA60AMT) reloads (purple). RESULTS: GST60B and GST60G staple lines produced significantly better mucosal capture scores than the EGIA60AMT staple lines (p < 0.001, in all tests). Compared to EGIA60AMT, leak pressures were 39% higher for GST60B (p < 0.001) and 23% higher for GST60G (p = 0.022). Initial staple line leak site was associated with incomplete mucosal capture 78% of the time. CONCLUSIONS: There are differences in degree of mucosal capture between commercial staplers, and the devices that produce better mucosal capture had significantly higher leak pressures. Further research is needed to determine the significance of these findings on staple line healing throughout the postoperative period.
BACKGROUND:Anastomotic leak is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in gastrointestinal surgery. The serosal aspect of staple lines is commonly observed for integrity, but the mucosal surface and state of mucosa after firing is less often inspected. We sought to assess the degree of mucosal capture when using stapling devices and determine whether incomplete capture influences staple line integrity. METHODS: Porcine ileum was transected in vivo and staple lines were collected and rated for degree of mucosal capture on a 5-point scale from 1 (mucosa mainly captured on both sides) to 5 (majority of mucosa not captured). Mucosal capture was also assessed in ex vivo staple lines, and fluid leakage pressure and location of first leak was assessed. Stapling devices studied were Echelon Flex GST with 60-mm blue (GST60B) and green (GST60G) cartridges, and Medtronic EndoGIA Universal with Tri-Staple Technology™ with 60 mm medium (EGIA60AMT) reloads (purple). RESULTS: GST60B and GST60G staple lines produced significantly better mucosal capture scores than the EGIA60AMT staple lines (p < 0.001, in all tests). Compared to EGIA60AMT, leak pressures were 39% higher for GST60B (p < 0.001) and 23% higher for GST60G (p = 0.022). Initial staple line leak site was associated with incomplete mucosal capture 78% of the time. CONCLUSIONS: There are differences in degree of mucosal capture between commercial staplers, and the devices that produce better mucosal capture had significantly higher leak pressures. Further research is needed to determine the significance of these findings on staple line healing throughout the postoperative period.
Authors: Carlos M Mery; Bilal M Shafi; Gary Binyamin; John M Morton; Michael Gertner Journal: Surg Obes Relat Dis Date: 2008-01-28 Impact factor: 4.734
Authors: Elizabeth R Berger; Ronald H Clements; John M Morton; Kristopher M Huffman; Bruce M Wolfe; Ninh T Nguyen; Clifford Y Ko; Matthew M Hutter Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2016-09 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Benjamin D Shogan; Natalia Belogortseva; Preston M Luong; Alexander Zaborin; Simon Lax; Cindy Bethel; Marc Ward; Joseph P Muldoon; Mark Singer; Gary An; Konstantin Umanskiy; Vani Konda; Baddr Shakhsheer; James Luo; Robin Klabbers; Lynn E Hancock; Jack Gilbert; Olga Zaborina; John C Alverdy Journal: Sci Transl Med Date: 2015-05-06 Impact factor: 17.956
Authors: Joanna W A M Bosmans; Martine Moossdorff; Mahdi Al-Taher; Lotte van Beek; Joep P M Derikx; Nicole D Bouvy Journal: Int J Colorectal Dis Date: 2016-03-10 Impact factor: 2.571