Yasmin Abu-Ghanem1,2, Chanan Meydan1,2, Lior Segev1,2, Moshe Rubin1,2,3, Orit Blumenfeld4, Hadar Spivak5,6,7. 1. Department of Surgery, Tel HaShomer Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel. 2. Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel. 3. Herzliya Medical Center, 7 Ramat Yam St, 4685107, Herzliya, Israel. 4. Center for Disease Control, Ministry of Health, Jerusalem, Israel. 5. Department of Surgery, Tel HaShomer Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel. hadarspivak@gmail.com. 6. Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel. hadarspivak@gmail.com. 7. Herzliya Medical Center, 7 Ramat Yam St, 4685107, Herzliya, Israel. hadarspivak@gmail.com.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Little evidence is available on the choice of linear staple reloads in laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG). Previous literature recommends matching closed staple height (CSH) to tissue-thickness (TT) to avoid ischemia. Our objective was to examine feasibility and safety of "tight" hemostatic (CSH/TT <1) stapling and map the entire gastric wall TT in LSG patients. METHODS: Prospectively collected outcomes on 202 consecutive patients who underwent LSG with tight order of staples (Ethicon Endosurgery) in this order: pre-pylorus-black (CSH = 2.3 mm), antrum-green (CSH = 2.0 mm), antrum/body-blue (CSH = 1.5 mm), and white (CSH = 1.0 mm) on the body and fundus. Measurements of entire gastric wall TT were made on the first 100 patients' gastric specimens with an electronic-dogmatic indicator. RESULTS: Study included 147 females and 55 males with a mean age of 41.5 ± 11.9 years and body mass index of 41.5 ± 3.8 kg/m2. Gastric wall measurements revealed mean CSH/TT ratio <1, decreasing from 0.7 ± 0.1 at pre-pylorus to 0.5 ± 0.1 at the fundus. There were 3.1% mechanical failures, mainly (68%) at pre-pylorus-black reloads. Post-operative bleeding occurred in 5 (2.5%) patients. There were no leaks or clinical evidence of sleeve ischemia. Stepwise regression analysis revealed that body mass index (P < 0.001), hypertension (P < 0.01), and male gender (P < 0.001) were associated with increased gastric TT. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that reloads with CSH/TT <1 in LSG including staples with CSH of 1 mm on body and fundus are safe. The results challenge the concept that tight stapling cause's ischemia. Since tight reloads are designed to improve hemostasis, their application could have clinical benefit.
BACKGROUND: Little evidence is available on the choice of linear staple reloads in laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG). Previous literature recommends matching closed staple height (CSH) to tissue-thickness (TT) to avoid ischemia. Our objective was to examine feasibility and safety of "tight" hemostatic (CSH/TT <1) stapling and map the entire gastric wall TT in LSG patients. METHODS: Prospectively collected outcomes on 202 consecutive patients who underwent LSG with tight order of staples (Ethicon Endosurgery) in this order: pre-pylorus-black (CSH = 2.3 mm), antrum-green (CSH = 2.0 mm), antrum/body-blue (CSH = 1.5 mm), and white (CSH = 1.0 mm) on the body and fundus. Measurements of entire gastric wall TT were made on the first 100 patients' gastric specimens with an electronic-dogmatic indicator. RESULTS: Study included 147 females and 55 males with a mean age of 41.5 ± 11.9 years and body mass index of 41.5 ± 3.8 kg/m2. Gastric wall measurements revealed mean CSH/TT ratio <1, decreasing from 0.7 ± 0.1 at pre-pylorus to 0.5 ± 0.1 at the fundus. There were 3.1% mechanical failures, mainly (68%) at pre-pylorus-black reloads. Post-operative bleeding occurred in 5 (2.5%) patients. There were no leaks or clinical evidence of sleeve ischemia. Stepwise regression analysis revealed that body mass index (P < 0.001), hypertension (P < 0.01), and male gender (P < 0.001) were associated with increased gastric TT. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that reloads with CSH/TT <1 in LSG including staples with CSH of 1 mm on body and fundus are safe. The results challenge the concept that tight stapling cause's ischemia. Since tight reloads are designed to improve hemostasis, their application could have clinical benefit.
Authors: Nasser Sakran; Ahmad Assalia; Ahud Sternberg; Yoram Kluger; Anton Troitsa; Eran Brauner; Sebastiaan Van Cauwenberge; Marieke De Visschere; Bruno Dillemans Journal: Obes Surg Date: 2011-02 Impact factor: 4.129
Authors: Suzanne E Thompson; Maggie T Young; Michelle T Lewis; Steven M Boronyak; Jeffrey W Clymer; Elliott J Fegelman; Deborah A Nagle Journal: Obes Surg Date: 2018-11 Impact factor: 4.129
Authors: Mohamed A Aboueisha; Meredith Freeman; Jonathan K Allotey; Leah Evans; Michael Z Caposole; Danielle Tatum; Shauna Levy; John W Baker; Carlos Galvani Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2022-08-04 Impact factor: 3.453
Authors: Christen E Salyer; Jonathan Thompson; Dennis Hanseman; Tayyab Diwan; Brad M Watkins; Joshua Kuethe; Michael D Goodman Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2021-11-12 Impact factor: 3.453
Authors: Eujin Yeo; Jonathan Thompson; Dennis Hanseman; Adam Dunki-Jacobs; Ben Thompson; Michael Goodman; Tayyab Diwan Journal: Surgery Date: 2020-11-28 Impact factor: 3.982