| Literature DB >> 29955137 |
Daeheon Choi1, Ju-Young Han1,2, Jung Hyun Shin1, Chae-Min Ryu1,2, Hwan Yeul Yu1,2, Aram Kim3, Seungun Lee2,4, Jisun Lim2,4, Dong-Myung Shin5,6, Myung-Soo Choo7.
Abstract
This study assessed the functional role of WNT genes and the association between WNT signalling cascades and fibrosis in interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome (IC/BPS) patients. Twenty-five patients (3 males, 22 females; mean age 59.7 ± 10.9 years), included 7 non-Hunner-type IC (NHIC), 18 Hunner-type IC (HIC), and 5 non-IC (control) groups. The expression of sonic hedgehog, WNT gene family, and genes previously reported as biomarkers for IC/BPS were examined using RT-PCR in biopsy specimens from the mucosa and submucosa layer of the bladder. WNT2B, WNT5A, WNT10A, and WNT11 functions in the urothelium were evaluated by silencing in an HBlEpC cell line. Pelvic Pain and Urgency/Frequency Patient Symptom Scale scores, O'Leary-Sant Symptom and Problem Index scores, and Visual Analogue Scores did not differ between the NHIC and HIC groups. However, HIC patients had significantly shorter symptom duration (30.9 vs 70.8 months, p = 0.046), higher daily urinary frequency (16.1 versus 8.5 times, p = 0.006), and smaller bladder capacity (208.6 versus 361.4 ml, p = 0.006) than NHIC patients. Overall WNT gene expression was lower in NHIC than HIC patients. Bladder epithelial tissues from HIC patients were characterised by the downregulation of WNT11. Silencing of WNT11, WNT2B, WNT5A, and WNT10A in HBlEpCs resulted in fibrotic changes, indicated by fibrotic morphology, increased fibrosis-related gene expression, and nuclear localisation of phosphorylated SMAD2, and increased vimentin and fibronectin levels. Downregulation of WNT11 results in fibrotic changes of bladder epithelial cells and is associated with the pathogenesis and differential diagnosis of NHIC. Decreased expression of WNT11 is a potential biomarker for predicting NHIC.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29955137 PMCID: PMC6023880 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-28093-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Patient characteristics.
| Total (n = 30) | NHIC (n = 7) | HIC (n = 18) | p-value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 59.7 ± 10.9 | 65.4 ± 7.3 | 56.5 ± 11.8 | 0.064 |
| Gender (M/F) | 4 vs 26 | 1 vs 6 | 2 vs 16 | 0.929 |
| Duration of symptoms (months) | 39.6 ± 31.9 | 70.8 ± 42.9 | 30.9 ± 22.8 | 0.046 |
| PUF | 22.6 ± 6.4 | 19.8 ± 4.0 | 23.7 ± 6.9 | 0.135 |
| IC-Q | 28.3 ± 7.0 | 25.0 ± 4.6 | 29.6 ± 7.5 | 0.051 |
| VAS | 6.9 ± 2.4 | 6.8 ± 1.7 | 7.0 ± 2.7 | 0.959 |
| Voiding diary | ||||
| Urinary frequency (times/day) | 13.3 ± 6.9 | 8.5 ± 2.6 | 16.1 ± 7.3 | 0.006 |
| Urinary urgency (times/day) | 9.5 ± 7.7 | 7.0 ± 3.5 | 10.9 ± 9.5 | 0.682 |
| Urge incontinence (times/day) | 0.6 ± 1.4 | 1.1 ± 1.6 | 0.4 ± 1.3 | 0.213 |
| Maximum bladder capacity (ml) | 262.6 ± 160.6 | 361.4 ± 133.6 | 208.6 ± 163.9 | 0.006 |
Standard abbreviations: EMT, epithelial-mesenchymal transition; GAG, Glycosaminoglycans; HIC, Hunner-type IC; IC/BPS, interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome; IC-Q, O’Leary-Sant Symptom and Problem Index; MSCs, mesenchymal stem cells; NAC, N-acetylcysteine; NHIC, non-Hunner-type IC; PUF, Pelvic Pain and Urgency/Frequency Patient Symptom Scale; RQ-PCR, Real-time quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction; SHH, sonic hedgehog; TUR-C, transurethral resection and coagulation; VAS, Visual Analogue Score.
Figure 1Comparison of gene expression associated with IC/BPS pathology between NHIC and HIC patient bladder tissues. (a–f) RQ-PCR analysis of the known biomarkers of IC/BPS, including those of inflammation (a), growth factors (b), apoptosis (c), nitric oxide synthase (d), acetylcholine neurotransmitter biosynthesis (e), and transcription regulators (f) in the bladder tissues of the indicated patient groups. Gene expression is presented as a percentage of GAPDH. Data are represented as a dot plot of mean ± SEM [n = 6 for non-IC; n = 11 for non-Hunner-type IC (NHIC) and n = 19 for Hunner lesions in Hunner-type IC (HIC); *p < 0.05 using one-way ANOVA analysis with a Bonferroni post-hoc test]. Non-IC, stress urinary incontinence patients.
Figure 2Downregulation of SHH or WNT family genes in the bladder tissue of NHIC patients. (a,b) RQ-PCR analysis of the genes involved in SHH (a) and WNT (b) pathways in the bladder tissues of the indicated patient groups. Gene expression is presented as percentage of GAPDH. Data are represented as a dot plot of mean ± SEM [n = 6 for non-IC; n = 11 for NHIC and 19 for HIC patient groups; *p < 0.05 by one-way ANOVA analysis with a Bonferroni post-hoc test].
Figure 3Morphological changes following silencing of WNT family genes in HBlEpC. (a) RQ-PCR analysis of the indicated genes in HBlEpC primary bladder epithelial cells at 4 days after infection with lentivirus containing each shRNA construct. Data normalised to the scramble control group (shCTR) are represented as mean ± SEM, n = 4, ***p < 0.001 using one-way ANOVA analysis. (b–f) Representative image of HBlEpC at the indicated days after infection with lentivirus containing shWNT11 (b), shWNT2B (c), shWNT5A (d), shWNT10A (e), and shHB-EGF (f) or scramble control (shCTR) construct (magnification x100, scale bar = 100 μm).
Figure 4Upregulation of fibrosis-related genes by knockdown of WNT family genes. (a–e) RQ-PCR analysis of genes involved in TGFβ signalling (e.g., TGFB1, TGFB2, TGFB3, TGFBR2, SMAD2, and SMAD3) and EMT (e.g., SANI1, SNAI2, SNAI3, TWIST1, and VIM) in HBlEpC cells at 7 days after infection with lentivirus containing shWNT11 (a), shWNT2B (b), shWNT5A (c), shWNT10A (d), and shHB-EGF (e) constructs. A scramble construct was used as the control (shCTR). Gene expression is presented as expression relative to the shCTR and is represented as mean ± SEM, n = 4, *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 using one-way ANOVA analysis.
Figure 5Nuclear localization of phosphorylated SMAD2 protein induced by downregulation of WNT family genes. (a–e) Immunofluorescent staining for nuclear localization of phosphorylated SMAD2 protein (green) in HBlEpC cells at 4 days after infection with lentivirus containing shWNT11 (a), shWNT2B (b), shWNT5A (c), shWNT10A (d), and shHB-EGF (e) constructs (magnification x200, scale bar = 100 μm). The higher magnification images (magnification x400, scale bar = 50 μm) are inserted in lower left corner in each image. Nuclei were stained with DAPI (blue). A scramble shRNA construct was used as the control.
Figure 6Induction of vimentin intermediate filament protein by silencing of WNT family genes. (a–e) Immunofluorescent staining of vimentin (green), an intermediate filament protein induced by the EMT process in HBlEpC cells at 4 days after infection with lentivirus containing shWNT11 (a), shWNT2B (b), shWNT5A (c), shWNT10A (d), and shHB-EGF (e) constructs (magnification x200, scale bar = 100 μm). The higher magnification images (magnification x400, scale bar = 50 μm) are inserted in lower left corner in each image. Nuclei were stained with DAPI (blue). Note that low vimentin expression was observed following downregulation of HB-EGF unlike that following downregulation of WNT family genes. A scramble shRNA construct was used as the control.
Figure 7Increased fibronectin extracellular matrix protein by knockdown of WNT family genes. (a–d) Immunofluorescent staining of fibronectin (green), an extracellular matrix protein in HBlEpC cells, at 7 days after infection with lentivirus containing shWNT11 (a), shWNT2B (b), shWNT5A (c), and shWNT10A (d) constructs (magnification x200, scale bar = 100 μm). The higher magnification images (magnification x400, scale bar = 50 μm) are inserted in the lower left corner in each image. Nuclei were stained with DAPI (blue). A scramble shRNA construct was used as the control.
Figure 8Western blot analysis of TGFβ activation and fibrosis by knockdown of WNT family genes. Western blot was used to detect the phosphorylated SMAD2 protein (p-SMAD2), vimentin, and fibronectin proteins in HBlEpC cells at 7 days after infection with lentivirus containing shWNT2B, shWNT5A, shWNT10A, and shWNT11 constructs. For control, HBlEpC cells without infection (not-treated; NT) or infected with empty lentivirus (Empty) were used. β-ACTIN was used as a loading control. Molecular weight (M.W.) marker sizes (kD) are shown on the left.
Sequences of the primers used in this study.
| Gene | Symbol | Forward Primer | Reverse primer |
|---|---|---|---|
| C-C motif chemokine receptor 2 | CCR2 | TACGCTCCATCGCTGTCATCTC | GCGAAGCACTGAAACACTCGAA |
| C-C motif chemokine ligand 2 | MCP-1 | TTCCCCTAGCTTTCCCCAGA | TCCCAGGGGTAGAACTGTGGT |
| nuclear factor kappa B subunit 1 | NFKB | TGC ATC TGG GGA TGA GGT TG | TGG TCA GAA GGA ATG CCA GG |
| heparin binding EGF like growth factor | HB-EGF | CAA GTC TCA GAA GAG GTT GGG C | CAC CAG AAG AAT GGC AGG AGT T |
| nerve growth factor | NGF | AAG CGG TCA TCA TCC CAT CC | CAC CTC CTT GCC CTT GAT GTC |
| nitric oxide synthase 1 | nNOS | ATC CAG TGC TCT TGA GCT GGG | TTG GGC CTT CTG GAA AAC CA |
| nitric oxide synthase 2 | iNOS | TCG GAG CCT CCT CTC TCA AAC T | GGT GCA CTC AGC AGC AAG TTC |
| nitric oxide synthase 3 | eNOS | TGG GTC CGC CTT AAT CTG G | TGT AAT CCA CAT GAG CTG GGG |
| cyclin dependent kinase inhibitor 2A | ARF | GAG GCT CTG AGA AAC CTC GGG | AAA ACT ACG AAA GCG GGG TGG |
| choline O-acetyltransferase | CHAT | ATG GCC ATT GAC AAC CAC CTG | GCA GCA GAA CAT CTC CGT GGT |
| solute carrier family 5 member 7 | CHT | TTG TAC CCA TCA TGT GCT CTG TT | TAT CCA CAG GTG TTG CCT TCC |
| jumping translocation breakpoint | PAR | TGG AAG TTC GAA GGG GCT G | CTC GAT TTG CTT CCG GAC CT |
| POU class 2 homeobox 1 | OCT_1 | AGC AGC TTG AAT GAG GCA GTG | TTT GGC TAA CAG GCA CTC TGG |
| nuclear receptor corepressor 2 | SMRT | TTA GCG CTC TGG ACA GAT GGA | TGG CCT GAC TTG GTT TCC AG |
| GLI transcription factor family | GLI-1 | CCA GCT GTG GTC ATC CTG AGG | AAG ATC AAG AGA GTC CAG GGG GTT |
| patched 1 | PTC-1 | AGT TAC CAT TGG CGA CCT AGC AT | TGA TGG CTC CAA CAC TAA CTG TCT C |
| Wnt family member 2B | WNT2B | CTC CCT GAT TTC CCG CTC TG | AGA AGT ATC GGG AAG CTG GTG C |
| Wnt family member 5A | WNT5A | AAT AGG CAC GAA GGC ACA GGT C | AAC ACG GCA TCT CTC TTT CAC CA |
| Wnt family member 4 | WNT4 | CAT CCT GCC CAA ACC ACT CTC | CGT CAC AAT GGC AAA GAG CC |
| Wnt family member 8A | WNT8A | GCA GAG GCG GAA CTG ATC TTT | GTT GTG GCT GTT CTG TAG GCA CT |
| Wnt family member 8B | WNT8B | GGG GTT GGT TCC TAG AGG CAG | TGT ATC TGG AGT CCC TCG GGT T |
| Wnt family member 11 | WNT11 | TCT TTG GGG TGG CAC TTC TC | TCT GCC GAG TTC ACT TGA CG |
| Wnt family member 10A | WNT10A | TTG GCT CTT GGG AAG AGG AGA | TGA GTG GTG GGG TTC AGA CAG |
| Wnt family member 10B | WNT10B | CCA GGC CCT TAG GGA AGT TG | CCA CCC TTC CTG CTG AAG AA |
Sequences of the top and bottom oligonucleotides for each shRNA used in this study.
|
| |
|
| |
| CAC CGA AGT GCA ATG TCT TCC AAG TCG AAA CTT GGA AGA CAT TGC ACT TC | |
| AAA AGA AGT GCA ATG TCT TCC AAG TTT CGA CTT GGA AGA CAT TGC ACT TC | |
| CAC CGC AAG TTG GTA CAG GTC AAC ACG AAT GTT GAC CTG TAC CAA CTT GC | |
| AAA AGC AAG TTG GTA CAG GTC AAC ATT CGT GTT GAC CTG TAC CAA CTT GC | |
|
| |
|
| |
| CAC CGC GTG TGC TAT GGC ATC AAG TCG AAA CTT GAT GCC ATA GCA CAC GC | |
| AAA AGC GTG TGC TAT GGC ATC AAG TTT CGA CTT GAT GCC ATA GCA CAC GC | |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|