Literature DB >> 29955027

Genomic and transcriptomic analyses reveal selection of genes for puberty in Bama Xiang pigs.

Yang Yang1,2, Adeniyi C Adeola1, Hai-Bing Xie1, Ya-Ping Zhang1,2.   

Abstract

The Bama Xiang pig (BMX) is a famous early-maturing Chinese indigenous breed with a two-end black coat. To uncover the genetic basis of the BMX phenotype, we conducted comparative genomic analyses between BMX and East Asian wild boars and Laiwu pigs, respectively. Genes under positive selection were enriched in pathways associated with gonadal hormone and melanin synthesis, consistent with the phenotypic changes observed during development in BMX pigs. We also performed differentially expressed gene analysis based on RNA-seq data from pituitary tissues of BMX and Large White pigs. The CTTNBP2NL, FRS2, KANK4, and KATNAL1 genes were under selection and exhibited expressional changes in the pituitary tissue, which may affect BMX pig puberty. Our study demonstrated the positive selection of early maturity in the development of BMX pigs and advances our knowledge on the role of regulatory elements in puberty evolution in pigs.

Entities:  

Keywords:  BAMA Xiang pig; Differentially expressed genes; Pituitary; Puberty

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29955027      PMCID: PMC6085766          DOI: 10.24272/j.issn.2095-8137.2018.068

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Zool Res        ISSN: 2095-8137


INTRODUCTION

Pigs are important protein food source and globally distributed animal domesticated from Eurasian wild boars 9 000 years ago (Larson et al., 2005). During their long domestication history, pigs have exhibited abundant phenotypic variation in coat color, reproduction, and growth. This phenotypic diversity provides valuable animal models for genetic studies (Ciobanu et al., 2001; Rubin et al., 2012). The Bama Xiang pig (BMX) from Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region is a well-known variety noted for its early maturity and two-end black pigmentation. The female BMX pig matures at about three months, in sharp contrast to the five months observed in most other East Asian domestic pigs (China National Commission of Animal Genetic Resources, 2011). Thus, the BMX pig provides an important model to study early maturity and pigmentation evolution during pig domestication. In this study, we performed genomic screening of signatures of positive selection in the BMX pig in comparison with those of the East Asian wild boar (EAW) and Laiwu (LWU) pigs. The LWU pig has a normal maturity process (at six months) and black coat color (China National Commission of Animal Genetic Resources, 2011), but shares the same domestication origin as that of the BMX pig from East Asian wild boars (Wu et al., 2007). In combination with transcriptomic analysis, we identified genetic variations that were putatively associated with the maturity and pigment phenotype in the BMX pig. The primary goal of this study was to explore the (1) genomic evolutionary pattern shaped by development of the BMX pig, and (2) genetic variations associated with selection for early maturity and coat color in the BMX pig.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sample collection and resequencing of genomic DNA

We downloaded the genome resequencing data of six BMX, six LWU, and 13 EAW pigs from the NCBI database (Supplementary Table S1), as reported from earlier studies (Ai et al., 2015; Groenenet al., 2012; Li et al., 2013; Rubin et al., 2012). Sequence reads were filtered by removing adaptors and low-quality bases using Trimmomatic (Bolger et al., 2014). Genomic reads were aligned to the Sus scrofa 10.2 genome (Groenenet al., 2012) with the BWA program (Li & Durbin, 2010). Alignment was performed with a maximum of six mismatches allowed for each 100-bp fragment.

Single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) calling and annotation

SNP calling was performed with the DNA sequencing data of the 25 pig genomes using HaplotypeCaller in the GATK toolkit (McKenna et al., 2010). Only polymorphic SNPs were included in this analysis. VariantFiltration and SelectVariants were used to filter SNPs by quality score (QUAL <20) and depth of coverage (DP <10). SNPs were annotated with the GTF file downloaded from the NCBI website (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/). For annotation, SNPs were classified by their locations in protein-coding (synonymous or non-synonymous), intronic, intergenic, and untranslated region (UTR) sequences.

Selective sweep detection

Population fixation index (FST) (Weir & Cockerham, 1984), cross population extended haplotype homozygosity (XPEHH) (Sabeti et al., 2007), and nucleotide diversity (π) (Tajima, 1983) were used to search for signals of selection in the BMX pig genome. We analyzed selective sweeps in 10-kb non-overlapping sliding windows. Windows containing <5 SNPs were removed from the analysis. The FST values between BMX and other pigs (LWU and EAW) were calculated using VCFtools (Danecek et al., 2011). Haplotypes were inferred using Beagle software (Browning & Browning, 2007). Comparing the BMX pigs with LWU and EAW pigs, XPEHH was calculated to examine haplotypes that showed low levels of linkage decay in the BMX populations (Coop et al., 2009; Pickrell et al., 2009; Pritchard et al., 2010). The nucleotide diversities of BMX (πBMX), EAW (πEAW), and LWU (πLWU) pigs were then calculated separately using VCFtools (Danecek et al., 2011). To identify regions that showed low nucleotide diversity in the BMX pigs compared to the LWU and EAW pigs, we calculated πEAW divided by πBMX and πLWU divided by πBMX, respectively. Genomic windows showing high FST, low nucleotide diversity, and high XPEHH values were identified as having signatures of selection in BMX pigs. Candidate selective sweeps were chosen from genomic windows identified simultaneously by all three statistics as having values above the top 10% threshold in their empirical distributions.

RNA sample collection, sequencing, and identification of differentially expressed genes

Pituitary tissues were collected from three BMX pigs and three Large White pigs for RNA sequencing (RNA-seq). These pigs were females at 85 days after birth. The RNA-seq libraries with an inserted size of 250 bp were prepared using the Illumina standard RNA-seq library preparation pipeline and sequenced on the Illumina Hiseq 2000 platform, with 150-bp paired-end reads generated. In total, the transcriptomes of six pituitaries (GSA number: CRA000876) were used for comparative analysis. The RNA-seq clean reads were mapped onto the Sus scrofa 10.2 genome using Tophat2 (Kim et al., 2013). A new merged GTF annotation file was generated using Cufflinks and Cuffmerge (Trapnell et al., 2010). Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were identified by DESeq2 (Love et al., 2014). As DESeq2 required a raw read count table as input, we obtained the raw read count using HTseq (Anders et al., 2014). An FDR of <0.05 was used as the cutoff for DEGs. The ClueGO plugin in Cytoscape (Mlecnik et al., 2018) was used for gene ontology (GO) enrichment analysis. GO terms with a P-value of <0.05 were defined as enriched.

RESULTS

Selective signatures in BMX pig genomes

The whole genomes of six BMX, 13 EAW, and six LWU pigs were used to identify genomic variants underlying the development of BMX pigs. Genomic reads were quality filtered and mapped to the pig reference genome (Sus scrofa 10.2) (see Materials and Methods). A total of 43.5 million SNPs were identified in the 25 individuals. To identify signatures of selection in BMX pig genomes, we analyzed the FST (Weir & Cockerham, 1984), π (Tajima, 1983), and XPEHH (Sabeti et al., 2007) metrics along chromosomes in comparison to those of EAW and LWU pigs (Figure 1). Selective signatures were screened in 10-kb non-overlapping sliding windows and adjacent selective windows were combined. As recent artificial selection produces long stretches of haplotypes in a population (Amaral et al., 2008), a clustering of selective windows with intervals of less than nine windows was chosen as an indicator of a putatively selective sweep. Sweep regions greater than 30 kb in length were included in the following analyses. This procedure resulted in the identification of 257 genes within 339 putative selective sweeps in the BMX pig genomes (Supplementary Table S2).
Figure 1

Whole genome selective signatures of BMX pigs

Whole genome selective signatures of BMX pigs X-axis shows the positions of the windows along the 1–18 autosome chromosomes. Different chromosomes are displayed in different colors. Y-axis shows the FST (A), XPEHH (B), πEAW/BMX (C), and πLWU/BMX (D) values. FST and XPEHH values were calculated between BMX and (LWU+EAW) pigs. πEAW/BMX and πLWU/BMX were obtained from πEAW and πLWU divided by πBMX, respectively. Functional enrichment analysis of the gene set revealed significant overrepresentation of 59 terms (Table 1). Interestingly, several biological processes related to sexual maturity were involved, including “pituitary gland development” (BMP4, FGF10, and TBX19), “endocrine system development” (BMP4, CRH, FGF10, NEUROD1, and TBX19), and “negative regulation of reproductive process” (BMP4, CSN2, and ZP4). The pituitary is the most important endocrine gland involved in growth and reproduction regulation. In addition, five genes (FGF10, FGF2, MITF, PDGFC, and PDGFD) were involved in “Melanoma”, which might be associated with the two-end black pigmentation observed in BMX pigs, which differs from most Chinese domestic pigs with black coats (China National Commission of Animal Genetic Resources, 2011).
Table 1

Functional enrichment terms of positively selected genes in BMX pigs.

GO IDGO termP-value*
GO:0004080Neuroactive ligand-receptor interaction24.0E-15
GO:0060449Bud elongation involved in lung branching100.0E-6
GO:0032740Positive regulation of interleukin-17 production140.0E-6
GO:0060393Regulation of pathway-restricted SMAD protein phosphorylation230.0E-6
GO:0060389Pathway-restricted SMAD protein phosphorylation250.0E-6
GO:0032946Positive regulation of mononuclear cell proliferation310.0E-6
GO:0050671Positive regulation of lymphocyte proliferation310.0E-6
GO:0070665Positive regulation of leukocyte proliferation370.0E-6
GO:0048636Positive regulation of muscle organ development400.0E-6
GO:0045844Positive regulation of striated muscle tissue development400.0E-6
GO:1901863positive regulation of muscle tissue development450.0E-6
GO:0005412Arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC)490.0E-6
GO:0005218Melanoma560.0E-6
GO:0045740Positive regulation of DNA replication600.0E-6
GO:0009798Axis specification600.0E-6
GO:0090090Negative regulation of canonical Wnt signaling pathway600.0E-6
GO:0032660Regulation of interleukin-17 production660.0E-6
GO:0051155Positive regulation of striated muscle cell differentiation660.0E-6
GO:0032620Interleukin-17 production780.0E-6
GO:0042506Tyrosine phosphorylation of Stat5 protein780.0E-6
GO:0051145Smooth muscle cell differentiation800.0E-6
GO:0061037Negative regulation of cartilage development920.0E-6
GO:0048546Digestive tract morphogenesis950.0E-6
GO:0005410Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM)990.0E-6
GO:0051149Positive regulation of muscle cell differentiation1.2E-3
GO:0035270Endocrine system development1.3E-3
GO:0055025Positive regulation of cardiac muscle tissue development1.3E-3
GO:0042310Vasoconstriction1.5E-3
GO:0060602Branch elongation of an epithelium1.5E-3
GO:0001709Cell fate determination2.0E-3
GO:0021536Diencephalon development1.8E-3
GO:0021983Pituitary gland development2.2E-3
GO:0042307Positive regulation of protein import into nucleus2.3E-3
GO:0000561Glycerolipid metabolism2.4E-3
GO:0004730Long-term depression2.6E-3
GO:0003338Metanephros morphogenesis2.4E-3
GO:0030199Collagen fibril organization2.4E-3
GO:0060441Epithelial tube branching involved in lung morphogenesis3.0E-3
GO:0030219Megakaryocyte differentiation3.3E-3
GO:0042383Sarcolemma3.3E-3
GO:0009799Specification of symmetry3.3E-3
GO:0051153Regulation of striated muscle cell differentiation3.3E-3
GO:0010092Specification of organ identity3.3E-3
GO:1900182Positive regulation of protein localization to nucleus3.7E-3
GO:0005033Nicotine addiction4.0E-3
GO:0004140Regulation of autophagy5.9E-3
GO:2000242Negative regulation of reproductive process5.9E-3
GO:0070664Negative regulation of leukocyte proliferation5.1E-3
GO:0003401Axis elongation5.1E-3
GO:0009948Anterior/posterior axis specification5.5E-3
GO:0055024Regulation of cardiac muscle tissue development5.1E-3
GO:0004940Type I diabetes mellitus7.4E-3
GO:0048259Regulation of receptor-mediated endocytosis6.9E-3
GO:0007193Adenylate cyclase-inhibiting G-protein coupled receptor signaling pathway11.0E-3
GO:0009880Embryonic pattern specification11.0E-3
GO:0005160Transforming growth factor beta receptor binding9.5E-3
GO:0031623Receptor internalization11.0E-3
GO:0048286Lung alveolus development9.5E-3
GO:0010862Positive regulation of pathway-restricted SMAD protein phosphorylation10.0E-3

*: P-value obtained from ClueGO plugin in Cytoscape using default paraments. Only terms with P<0.05 are listed.

Functional enrichment terms of positively selected genes in BMX pigs. *: P-value obtained from ClueGO plugin in Cytoscape using default paraments. Only terms with P<0.05 are listed. Although many missense mutations are associated with the domestication of pigs (Fang et al., 2009; Li et al., 2010; Ren et al., 2011; Rubin et al., 2012), whether regulatory variants play a role and their effects on the domestication processes compared to coding variants remain unknown. To address this issue, we compared the evolutionary patterns for SNPs identified from the selective regions in the BMX pig genomes. A total of 830 949 SNPs were identified from 339 sweeps. Among these, 3 668 SNPs were located in coding sequences and 827 542 SNPs were located in noncoding sequences. We first focused on protein coding region variations located in the 339 sweeps. We examined highly differentiated missense mutations and analyzed their presence in DNA sequences encoding conserved protein sequences. We concentrated on missense SNPs with FST values up to the chromosomal top 0.1% threshold and compared BMX pigs to LWU and EAW pigs, respectively. We identified a dataset consisting of 11 missense SNPs from 10 genes (Supplementary Table S3). Alignment of the 10 protein sequences showed that the flanking sequences at the residues encoded by the 11 SNPs displayed low level cross-species conservation, implying weak functional constraints on these protein-coding variants. This indicated that regulatory elements rather than missense variants may have greater effects on BMX pig development.

Comparative transcriptomic analysis of pituitary tissues

We conducted transcriptomic profiling to examine gene expression changes due to selection in the BMX genomes as regulatory variants exhibited a profound role during BMX pig development. We chose pituitary tissue as the pituitary gland secretes reproduction-related hormones involved in maturity regulation. In our experimental design, we collected pituitary tissues from three BMX and three Large White pigs at 85 days after birth. At this stage, BMX pigs are close to maturity, whereas Large White pigs do not reach maturity until eight months of age (China National Commission of Animal Genetic Resources, 2011). The transcriptomes from the pituitary tissues were sequenced, from which we obtained 35 million mapped reads, on average, for each individual. We compared the gene expression levels in the pituitary and found 1 600 DEGs between BMX and Large White pigs. Although Large White pigs were domesticated from European wild boars (Larson et al., 2005;Rubin et al., 2012), the DEGs between BMX and Large White pigs provided valuable information on expressional changes in BMX pigs if they also exhibited selective signatures in the BMX genome. The DEGs were enriched in the following biological processes: “Estrogen signaling pathway” (ADCY6, ADCY8, CREB3L1, CREB5, FOS, GABBR2, GNAS, GRM1, KCNJ9, MMP9, PIK3CG, PIK3R5, and PRKACA), “Ovarian steroidogenesis” (ADCY6, ADCY8, ALOX5, GNAS, LDLR, LHCGR, and PRKACA), “Oocyte meiosis” ( ADCY6, ADCY8, CAMK2B, CAMK2D, CCNE1, CDC20, CPEB2, ESPL1, MAD2L2, MOS, PRKACA, and YWHAZ), “Developmental maturation” ( C12H17orf47, CDC20, EDNRB, FAM101B, LTF, PLP1, PRKACA, RBPJ, TAL1, WASH1, and WNT10B), and “Progesterone-mediated oocyte maturation” ( ADCY6, ADCY8, CPEB2, MAD2L2, MOS, PIK3CG, PIK3R5, and PRKACA) (Supplementary Table S4). These pathways all participate in sexual maturity. As both artificially selected genes and DEGs showed functional enrichment in maturity regulation, it is possible that differential gene expression was favored by the artificial selection of variants from some sweep loci. We therefore identified artificially selected genes with altered gene expression. In our analysis, a total of 22 artificially selected genes exhibited differential gene expression in the pituitary (P<0.05; FDR<0.05; Table 2). Interestingly, four genes (CTTNBP2NL, FRS2, KANK4, and KATNAL1) were related to reproduction (Figure 2). Compared to that in the Large White pigs, the expression of the CTTNBP2NL gene was increased in BMX pigs. CTTNBP2NL has been reported to affect conception rates in bovines (Sugimoto et al., 2013). FRS2 encodes a docking protein bound to FGF receptors, with a knockout study in mice indicating its involvement in epididymal development and sperm maturation (Xu et al., 2013). In the pituitary tissue, we found that the expression level of FRS2 in BMX pigs was about twice that found in Large White pigs. In addition, KANK4 was found to be differentially expressed in the pituitary tissues of BMX and Large White pigs. Although few studies have reported on the function of KANK4, it is located in a significant pig quantitative trait locus (QTL) for age at puberty (Bidanel et al., 2008). KATNAL1, which encodes Katanin Catalytic subunit A1 like 1, has been implicated in both meiosis and spermiogenesis (Smith et al., 2012).
Table 2

Overlap between positively selected genes and differentially expressed genes from pituitary tissue in BMX pigs.

GeneNormalized count fold change (BMX/LW)P-value*
MGAT5B 0.087.57E-05
BHLHE22 2.570.000 538
FAM174B 0.430.000 589
SFT2D2 0.280.001 381
TRHDE 2.130.005 172
COL23A1 0.120.006 991
FRMD4B 2.450.007 354
CDKN2B 0.140.007 441
FRS2 2.090.008 626
ATG4C 2.160.010 881
PELI2 1.900.012 313
FEZ2 2.120.018 321
LGALS12 0.130.020 835
TYRP1 0.130.025 025
KCND3 1.810.030 48
FNDC1 0.220.030 808
ATL3 0.460.033 021
KANK4 0.340.036 521
KATNAL1 1.990.037 825
CTTNBP2NL 2.270.039 048
ANO3 2.500.044 986
DYNC1I2 1.670.047 03

*: P-values are corrected by Benjamini-Hochberg FDR<0.05.

Figure 2

Normalized read counts of significantly differentially expressed genes CTTNBP2NL (A), FRS2 (B), KANK4 (C), and KATNAL1 (D) in the pituitary

Overlap between positively selected genes and differentially expressed genes from pituitary tissue in BMX pigs. *: P-values are corrected by Benjamini-Hochberg FDR<0.05. Normalized read counts of significantly differentially expressed genes CTTNBP2NL (A), FRS2 (B), KANK4 (C), and KATNAL1 (D) in the pituitary For each subgraph, red and green boxes represent gene expression in the pituitaries of BMX and Large White pigs, respectively. Upper whisker is maximum value, black horizontal line in box is median, and lower whisker is minimum value.

DISCUSSION

We conducted a comparative genomic analysis of BMX pigs with domestic pigs and wild boars from East Asia, and revealed selective signatures potentially associated with selection for early maturity and the two-end black phenotype. During domestication, selection is based on those functions and traits that are favored in pig breeds. As described earlier, selective signatures were detected for the specific phenotype of the BMX pig. This study sheds light on the evolution of puberty in pigs and provides important information and candidate genes for pig breeding. Puberty is an important trait related to economic output, with early maturity resulting in early slow growth. For instance, Western commercial breeds are characterized with late maturity for enlarged body size (Rubin et al., 2012). The present study revealed four loci (CTTNBP2NL, FRS2, KANK4, and KATNAL1) showing strong signatures of selection and functional association with puberty. In addition, the four genes exhibited differential expression between early and late maturity in pig breeds in the pituitary. This result indicates that regulatory elements may have considerable effect on BMX pig development. Coat color is a trait that is usually under strong selection in different breeds. In previous studies, several genes have been shown to be associated with coat color variants, including MC1R, KIT, and EDNRB (Kijas et al., 1998; Wiener & Wilkinson, 2011; Wilkinson et al., 2013). However, we found no selective signature of MC1R. The reason for this may be that selection of MC1R occurred during early domestication, and most Chinese indigenous pig breeds share the same haplotype (Li et al., 2010). Earlier research has indicated that mutations in MITF, PAX3, EDNRB, and KIT together may explain a large proportion of white spotting phenotypes in horses (Hauswirth et al., 2012). In BMX pigs, the two-end black phenotype is a complex trait resulting in the diversification of white areas on the body. We hypothesize that a correlation exists between coat color variants and different combinations of candidate genes. One limitation of this study was the identification of the DEG direction in RNA-seq analysis. As both BMX and Large White pigs are domesticated, it was difficult to identify the direction of gene expression without the use of an outgroup. We analyzed the overlap between DEGs (between BMX and Large White pigs) and the artificially selected genes in BMX pigs (compared to LWU and EAW pigs). The shared genes were more likely to be changed in BMX pigs. We did not focus on DEGs that did not exhibit selective signatures in the BMX pig genome. In addition, future analysis of Asian and European pig genome data will help clarify breed development in pigs.
  35 in total

1.  Artificial selection of the melanocortin receptor 1 gene in Chinese domestic pigs during domestication.

Authors:  J Li; H Yang; J-r Li; H-p Li; T Ning; X-R Pan; P Shi; Y-P Zhang
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2010-02-24       Impact factor: 3.821

Review 2.  Deciphering the genetic basis of animal domestication.

Authors:  Pamela Wiener; Samantha Wilkinson
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2011-09-01       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Worldwide phylogeography of wild boar reveals multiple centers of pig domestication.

Authors:  Greger Larson; Keith Dobney; Umberto Albarella; Meiying Fang; Elizabeth Matisoo-Smith; Judith Robins; Stewart Lowden; Heather Finlayson; Tina Brand; Eske Willerslev; Peter Rowley-Conwy; Leif Andersson; Alan Cooper
Journal:  Science       Date:  2005-03-11       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Genomic analyses identify distinct patterns of selection in domesticated pigs and Tibetan wild boars.

Authors:  Mingzhou Li; Shilin Tian; Long Jin; Guangyu Zhou; Ying Li; Yuan Zhang; Tao Wang; Carol K L Yeung; Lei Chen; Jideng Ma; Jinbo Zhang; Anan Jiang; Ji Li; Chaowei Zhou; Jie Zhang; Yingkai Liu; Xiaoqing Sun; Hongwei Zhao; Zexiong Niu; Pinger Lou; Lingjin Xian; Xiaoyong Shen; Shaoqing Liu; Shunhua Zhang; Mingwang Zhang; Li Zhu; Surong Shuai; Lin Bai; Guoqing Tang; Haifeng Liu; Yanzhi Jiang; Miaomiao Mai; Jian Xiao; Xun Wang; Qi Zhou; Zhiquan Wang; Paul Stothard; Ming Xue; Xiaolian Gao; Zonggang Luo; Yiren Gu; Hongmei Zhu; Xiaoxiang Hu; Yaofeng Zhao; Graham S Plastow; Jinyong Wang; Zhi Jiang; Kui Li; Ning Li; Xuewei Li; Ruiqiang Li
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2013-10-27       Impact factor: 38.330

5.  The Role of fibroblast growth factor receptor substrate 2 (FRS2) in the regulation of two activity levels of the components of the extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) pathway in the mouse epididymis.

Authors:  Bingfang Xu; Ling Yang; Barry T Hinton
Journal:  Biol Reprod       Date:  2013-08-29       Impact factor: 4.285

6.  A missense mutation in PPARD causes a major QTL effect on ear size in pigs.

Authors:  Jun Ren; Yanyu Duan; Ruimin Qiao; Fei Yao; Zhiyan Zhang; Bin Yang; Yuanmei Guo; Shijun Xiao; Rongxin Wei; Zixuan Ouyang; Nengshui Ding; Huashui Ai; Lusheng Huang
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2011-05-05       Impact factor: 5.917

7.  HTSeq--a Python framework to work with high-throughput sequencing data.

Authors:  Simon Anders; Paul Theodor Pyl; Wolfgang Huber
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2014-09-25       Impact factor: 6.937

8.  The genetics of human adaptation: hard sweeps, soft sweeps, and polygenic adaptation.

Authors:  Jonathan K Pritchard; Joseph K Pickrell; Graham Coop
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2010-02-23       Impact factor: 10.834

9.  Analyses of pig genomes provide insight into porcine demography and evolution.

Authors:  Martien A M Groenen; Alan L Archibald; Hirohide Uenishi; Christopher K Tuggle; Yasuhiro Takeuchi; Max F Rothschild; Claire Rogel-Gaillard; Chankyu Park; Denis Milan; Hendrik-Jan Megens; Shengting Li; Denis M Larkin; Heebal Kim; Laurent A F Frantz; Mario Caccamo; Hyeonju Ahn; Bronwen L Aken; Anna Anselmo; Christian Anthon; Loretta Auvil; Bouabid Badaoui; Craig W Beattie; Christian Bendixen; Daniel Berman; Frank Blecha; Jonas Blomberg; Lars Bolund; Mirte Bosse; Sara Botti; Zhan Bujie; Megan Bystrom; Boris Capitanu; Denise Carvalho-Silva; Patrick Chardon; Celine Chen; Ryan Cheng; Sang-Haeng Choi; William Chow; Richard C Clark; Christopher Clee; Richard P M A Crooijmans; Harry D Dawson; Patrice Dehais; Fioravante De Sapio; Bert Dibbits; Nizar Drou; Zhi-Qiang Du; Kellye Eversole; João Fadista; Susan Fairley; Thomas Faraut; Geoffrey J Faulkner; Katie E Fowler; Merete Fredholm; Eric Fritz; James G R Gilbert; Elisabetta Giuffra; Jan Gorodkin; Darren K Griffin; Jennifer L Harrow; Alexander Hayward; Kerstin Howe; Zhi-Liang Hu; Sean J Humphray; Toby Hunt; Henrik Hornshøj; Jin-Tae Jeon; Patric Jern; Matthew Jones; Jerzy Jurka; Hiroyuki Kanamori; Ronan Kapetanovic; Jaebum Kim; Jae-Hwan Kim; Kyu-Won Kim; Tae-Hun Kim; Greger Larson; Kyooyeol Lee; Kyung-Tai Lee; Richard Leggett; Harris A Lewin; Yingrui Li; Wansheng Liu; Jane E Loveland; Yao Lu; Joan K Lunney; Jian Ma; Ole Madsen; Katherine Mann; Lucy Matthews; Stuart McLaren; Takeya Morozumi; Michael P Murtaugh; Jitendra Narayan; Dinh Truong Nguyen; Peixiang Ni; Song-Jung Oh; Suneel Onteru; Frank Panitz; Eung-Woo Park; Hong-Seog Park; Geraldine Pascal; Yogesh Paudel; Miguel Perez-Enciso; Ricardo Ramirez-Gonzalez; James M Reecy; Sandra Rodriguez-Zas; Gary A Rohrer; Lauretta Rund; Yongming Sang; Kyle Schachtschneider; Joshua G Schraiber; John Schwartz; Linda Scobie; Carol Scott; Stephen Searle; Bertrand Servin; Bruce R Southey; Goran Sperber; Peter Stadler; Jonathan V Sweedler; Hakim Tafer; Bo Thomsen; Rashmi Wali; Jian Wang; Jun Wang; Simon White; Xun Xu; Martine Yerle; Guojie Zhang; Jianguo Zhang; Jie Zhang; Shuhong Zhao; Jane Rogers; Carol Churcher; Lawrence B Schook
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-11-15       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  TopHat2: accurate alignment of transcriptomes in the presence of insertions, deletions and gene fusions.

Authors:  Daehwan Kim; Geo Pertea; Cole Trapnell; Harold Pimentel; Ryan Kelley; Steven L Salzberg
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2013-04-25       Impact factor: 13.583

View more
  8 in total

1.  Whole-genome sequence analysis reveals selection signatures for important economic traits in Xiang pigs.

Authors:  Xiying Wang; Xueqin Ran; Xi Niu; Shihui Huang; Sheng Li; Jiafu Wang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-07-12       Impact factor: 4.996

2.  Genome-Wide Association Studies, Runs of Homozygosity Analysis, and Copy Number Variation Detection to Identify Reproduction-Related Genes in Bama Xiang Pigs.

Authors:  Jiayuan Mo; Yujie Lu; Siran Zhu; Lingli Feng; Wenjing Qi; Xingfa Chen; Bingkun Xie; Baojian Chen; Ganqiu Lan; Jing Liang
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2022-05-31

3.  Dual RNA-seq provides novel insight into the roles of dksA from Pseudomonas plecoglossicida in pathogen-host interactions with large yellow croakers ( Larimichthys crocea).

Authors:  Lu-Ying Wang; Zi-Xu Liu; Ling-Min Zhao; Li-Xing Huang; Ying-Xue Qin; Yong-Quan Su; Wei-Qiang Zheng; Fan Wang; Qing-Pi Yan
Journal:  Zool Res       Date:  2020-07-18

4.  A worldwide map of swine short tandem repeats and their associations with evolutionary and environmental adaptations.

Authors:  Zhongzi Wu; Huanfa Gong; Mingpeng Zhang; Xinkai Tong; Huashui Ai; Shijun Xiao; Miguel Perez-Enciso; Bin Yang; Lusheng Huang
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2021-04-23       Impact factor: 4.297

5.  Dual RNA-Seq of Trunk Kidneys Extracted From Channel Catfish Infected With Yersinia ruckeri Reveals Novel Insights Into Host-Pathogen Interactions.

Authors:  Yibin Yang; Xia Zhu; Haixin Zhang; Yuhua Chen; Yi Song; Xiaohui Ai
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2021-12-15       Impact factor: 8.786

6.  Stress Reactivity, Susceptibility to Hypertension, and Differential Expression of Genes in Hypertensive Compared to Normotensive Patients.

Authors:  Dmitry Oshchepkov; Irina Chadaeva; Rimma Kozhemyakina; Karina Zolotareva; Bato Khandaev; Ekaterina Sharypova; Petr Ponomarenko; Anton Bogomolov; Natalya V Klimova; Svetlana Shikhevich; Olga Redina; Nataliya G Kolosova; Maria Nazarenko; Nikolay A Kolchanov; Arcady Markel; Mikhail Ponomarenko
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-03-04       Impact factor: 5.923

7.  Novel insights into host-pathogen interactions of large yellow croakers ( Larimichthys crocea) and pathogenic bacterium Pseudomonas plecoglossicida using time-resolved dual RNA-seq of infected spleens.

Authors:  Yi Tang; Ge Xin; Ling-Min Zhao; Li-Xing Huang; Ying-Xue Qin; Yong-Quan Su; Wei-Qiang Zheng; Bin Wu; Nan Lin; Qing-Pi Yan
Journal:  Zool Res       Date:  2020-05-18

8.  OrthReg: a tool to predict cis-regulatory elements based on cross-species orthologous sequence conservation.

Authors:  Yun-Fei Ma; Cui-Ping Huang; Fang-Ru Lu; Jin-Xiu Li; Xu-Man Han; Adeniyi C Adeola; Yun Gao; Jia-Kun Deng; Hai-Bing Xie; Ya-Ping Zhang
Journal:  Zool Res       Date:  2020-07-18
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.