Literature DB >> 29954855

Reaching cardiovascular prevention guideline targets with a polypill-based approach: a meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials.

Vanessa Selak1, Ruth Webster2, Sandrine Stepien2, Chris Bullen3, Anushka Patel2, Simon Thom4, Bruce Arroll5, Michiel L Bots6, Alex Brown7, Sue Crengle8, Prabhakaran Dorairaj9, C Raina Elley5, Diederick E Grobbee6, Matire Harwood10, Graham S Hillis11, Tracey-Lea Laba12, Bruce Neal2, David Peiris2, Natasha Rafter13, Christopher Reid14, Alice Stanton15, Andrew Tonkin16, Tim Usherwood2,17, Angela Wadham3, Anthony Rodgers2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine the effect of polypill-based care on the achievement of 2016 European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guideline targets for blood pressure (BP), low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol and antiplatelet therapy.
METHODS: We conducted an individual participant data meta-analysis of three randomised clinical trials that compared a strategy using a polypill containing aspirin, statin and antihypertensive therapy with usual care in patients with a prior cardiovascular disease (CVD) event or who were at high risk of their first event. Overall, the trials included 3140 patients from Australia, England, India, Ireland, the Netherlands and New Zealand (75% male, mean age 62 years and 76% with a prior CVD event). The primary outcome for this study was the proportion of people achieving ESC guideline targets for BP, LDL and antiplatelet therapy.
RESULTS: Those randomised to polypill-based care were more likely than those receiving usual care to achieve recommended targets for BP (62% vs 58%, risk ratio (RR) 1.08, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.15), LDL (39% vs 34%, RR 1.13, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.25) and all three targets for BP, LDL and adherence to antiplatelet therapy (the latter only applicable to those with a prior CVD event) simultaneously (24% vs 19%, RR 1.27, 95% CI 1.10 to 1.47) at 12 months. There was no difference between groups in antiplatelet adherence (96% vs 96%, RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.98 to 1.01). There was heterogeneity by baseline treatment intensity such that treatment effects increased with the fewer the number of treatments being taken at baseline: for patients taking 3, 2 and 0-1 treatment modalities the RRs for reaching all three guideline goals simultaneously were 1.10 (95% CI 0.94 to 1.30, 22% vs 20%), 1.62 (95% CI 1.09 to 2.42, 27% vs 17%) and 3.07 (95% CI 1.77 to 5.33, 35% vs 11%), respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Polypill-based therapy significantly improved the achievement of all three ESC targets for BP, LDL and antiplatelet therapy compared with usual care, particularly among those undertreated at baseline. © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2019. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cardiac risk factors and prevention

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29954855     DOI: 10.1136/heartjnl-2018-313108

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heart        ISSN: 1355-6037            Impact factor:   5.994


  8 in total

Review 1.  Promises, promises, and precision medicine.

Authors:  Michael J Joyner; Nigel Paneth
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2019-01-28       Impact factor: 14.808

Review 2.  How ACE inhibitors transformed the renin-angiotensin system.

Authors:  Y S Bakhle
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2020-04-12       Impact factor: 8.739

3.  PoLA/CFPiP/PCS/PSLD/PSD/PSH guidelines on diagnosis and therapy of lipid disorders in Poland 2021.

Authors:  Maciej Banach; Paweł Burchardt; Krzysztof Chlebus; Piotr Dobrowolski; Dariusz Dudek; Krzysztof Dyrbuś; Mariusz Gąsior; Piotr Jankowski; Jacek Jóźwiak; Longina Kłosiewicz-Latoszek; Irina Kowalska; Maciej Małecki; Aleksander Prejbisz; Michał Rakowski; Jacek Rysz; Bogdan Solnica; Dariusz Sitkiewicz; Grażyna Sygitowicz; Grażyna Sypniewska; Tomasz Tomasik; Adam Windak; Dorota Zozulińska-Ziółkiewicz; Barbara Cybulska
Journal:  Arch Med Sci       Date:  2021-11-08       Impact factor: 3.318

Review 4.  Interventions for Adherence Improvement in the Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Diseases: Expert Consensus Statement.

Authors:  Sang Hyun Ihm; Kwang-Il Kim; Kyung Jin Lee; Jong Won Won; Jin Oh Na; Seung-Woon Rha; Hack-Lyoung Kim; Sang-Hyun Kim; Jinho Shin
Journal:  Korean Circ J       Date:  2022-01       Impact factor: 3.243

5.  [Medication-based secondary prevention in patients with peripheral arterial occlusive disease : An analysis based on secondary data].

Authors:  Katrin Gebauer; Kerstin Wintersohl; Rike Kraska; Katja Kortendick; Ulrike Fahrland; Eva Freisinger; Matthias Meyborg; Jacqueline Stella; Christiane Engelbertz; Holger Reinecke; Nasser Malyar
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2020-11-18       Impact factor: 1.443

Review 6.  Reducing Premature Mortality from Cardiovascular and Other Non-Communicable Diseases by One Third: Achieving Sustainable Development Goal Indicator 3.4.1.

Authors:  Thomas R Frieden; Laura K Cobb; Robynn C Leidig; Sumi Mehta; Daniel Kass
Journal:  Glob Heart       Date:  2020-07-30

Review 7.  Does the Polypill Improve Patient Adherence Compared to Its Individual Formulations? A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Ana Baumgartner; Katarina Drame; Stijn Geutjens; Marja Airaksinen
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2020-02-22       Impact factor: 6.321

8.  Effect of FIXed-dose combination of ARb and statin on adherence and risk factor control: The randomized FIXAR study.

Authors:  Seyong Chung; Young-Guk Ko; Jung Sun Kim; Byeong-Keuk Kim; Chul-Min Ahn; Sungha Park; Sung-Jin Hong; Sang-Hak Lee; Donghoon Choi
Journal:  Cardiol J       Date:  2020-12-21       Impact factor: 3.487

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.