| Literature DB >> 29954087 |
Edgar Cambaza1,2, Shigenobu Koseki3, Shuso Kawamura4.
Abstract
Size-based fungal growth studies have limitations. For example, the growth in size stops in closed systems once it reaches the borders and poorly describes metabolic status, especially in the stationary phase. This might lead mycotoxin studies to unrealistic results. Color change could be a viable alternative, as pigments result from a mold’s metabolic activity. This study aimed to verify the possibility of using gray values and the RGB system to analyze the growth of Fusarium graminearum. It consisted of color and area measurements using ImageJ software for specimens grown in yeast extract agar (YEA). The results suggest the utility of color and gray values as reliable tools to analyze the growth of F. graminearum.Entities:
Keywords: Fusarium graminearum; RGB; gray scale; mycelial growth
Year: 2018 PMID: 29954087 PMCID: PMC6069261 DOI: 10.3390/foods7070100
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Foods ISSN: 2304-8158
Figure 1Daily growth of F. graminearum.
Figure 2Comparison between the mean and modal gray values from the experimental data.
Comparison between the mean and modal colors (RGB) from a 6-day photo of F. graminearum measured by 21 different people.
| Statistics | Mean | Mode |
|---|---|---|
| Average | 147.89 | 146.71 |
| Standard error | 3.10 | 3.62 |
| Median | 157 | 160 |
| Mode | 157 | 173 |
| Standard-deviation | 24.61 | 28.74 |
| Variance | 605.77 | 825.98 |
| Kurtosis | −1.52 | −1.52 |
| Skewness | −0.53 | −0.61 |
| Range | 63 | 66 |
| Minimum | 111 | 107 |
| Maximum | 174 | 173 |
| Sum | 9317 | 9243 |
| Count | 63 | 63 |
Figure 3Mycelial area of F. graminearum for 20 days.
Figure 4Gray value variation in the samples. The equation represents the trend line for the mean gray value.
Figure 5Skewness (a) and kurtosis (b) of F. graminearum’s gray scale.
Correlation between the gray central tendency measures and mycelial area of F. graminearum.
| Parameter | Area (mm2) | |
|---|---|---|
| Mean gray value | Pearson Correlation | −0.533 * |
| Sig. (2-tailed) | 0.019 | |
| N | 19 | |
| Modal gray value | Pearson Correlation | −0.577 ** |
| Sig. (2-tailed) | 0.010 | |
| N | 19 |
* Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed). ** Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).
Figure 6The mean values of the red (a), green (b), blue (c) channels, and the correlations between their means (d). ** Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).
Correlations between RGB colors and the central tendency gray measures.
| Correlations | Mean Gray Value | Modal Gray Value | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Red | Pearson Correlation | 0.825 ** | 0.865 ** |
| Sig. (2-tailed) | <0.001 | <0.001 | |
| N | 19 | 19 | |
| Green | Pearson Correlation | 0.858 ** | 0.902 ** |
| Sig. (2-tailed) | <0.001 | <0.001 | |
| N | 19 | 19 | |
| Blue | Pearson Correlation | 0.846 ** | 0.881 ** |
| Sig. (2-tailed) | <0.001 | <0.001 | |
| N | 19 | 19 | |
** Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).