Literature DB >> 29951750

A multifaceted individualized pneumoperitoneum strategy for laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a multicenter observational feasibility study.

Oscar Diaz-Cambronero1, Blas Flor Lorente2, Guido Mazzinari3, Maria Vila Montañes4, Nuria García Gregorio4, Daniel Robles Hernandez5, Luis Enrique Olmedilla Arnal6, Maria Pilar Argente Navarro4, Marcus J Schultz7,8, Carlos L Errando9.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: While guidelines for laparoscopic abdominal surgery advise using the lowest possible intra-abdominal pressure, commonly a standard pressure is used. We evaluated the feasibility of a predefined multifaceted individualized pneumoperitoneum strategy aiming at the lowest possible intra-abdominal pressure during laparoscopic colorectal surgery.
METHODS: Multicenter prospective study in patients scheduled for laparoscopic colorectal surgery. The strategy consisted of ventilation with low tidal volume, a modified lithotomy position, deep neuromuscular blockade, pre-stretching of the abdominal wall, and individualized intra-abdominal pressure titration; the effect was blindly evaluated by the surgeon. The primary endpoint was the proportion of surgical procedures completed at each individualized intra-abdominal pressure level. Secondary endpoints were the respiratory system driving pressure, and the estimated volume of insufflated CO2 gas needed to perform the surgical procedure.
RESULTS: Ninety-two patients were enrolled in the study. Fourteen cases were converted to open surgery for reasons not related to the strategy. The intervention was feasible in all patients and well-accepted by all surgeons. In 61 out of 78 patients (78%), surgery was performed and completed at the lowest possible IAP, 8 mmHg. In 17 patients, IAP was raised up to 12 mmHg. The relationship between IAP and driving pressure was almost linear. The mean estimated intra-abdominal CO2 volume at which surgery was performed was 3.2 L.
CONCLUSION: A multifaceted individualized pneumoperitoneum strategy during laparoscopic colorectal surgery was feasible and resulted in an adequate working space in most patients at lower intra-abdominal pressure and lower respiratory driving pressure. ClinicalTrials.gov (Trial Identifier: NCT03000465).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Colorectal surgery; Laparoscopy; Neuromuscular blockade

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29951750     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-018-6305-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  36 in total

1.  Moderate increase in intraabdominal pressure attenuates gastric mucosal oxygen saturation in patients undergoing laparoscopy.

Authors:  Lothar A Schwarte; Thomas W L Scheeren; Christel Lorenz; Filip De Bruyne; Artur Fournell
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 7.892

2.  Value and limitations of transpulmonary pressure calculations during intra-abdominal hypertension.

Authors:  Gustavo A Cortes-Puentes; Kenneth E Gard; Alexander B Adams; Katherine A Faltesek; Christopher P Anderson; David J Dries; John J Marini
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 7.598

Review 3.  Neuromuscular blockade for optimising surgical conditions during abdominal and gynaecological surgery: a systematic review.

Authors:  M V Madsen; A K Staehr-Rye; M R Gätke; C Claudius
Journal:  Acta Anaesthesiol Scand       Date:  2014-10-19       Impact factor: 2.105

Review 4.  Laparoscopic surgery and muscle relaxants: is deep block helpful?

Authors:  Aaron F Kopman; Mohamed Naguib
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 5.108

5.  Deep neuromuscular block reduces intra-abdominal pressure requirements during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective observational study.

Authors:  R M Van Wijk; R W Watts; T Ledowski; M Trochsler; J L Moran; G W N Arenas
Journal:  Acta Anaesthesiol Scand       Date:  2015-02-13       Impact factor: 2.105

Review 6.  Incidence of mortality and morbidity related to postoperative lung injury in patients who have undergone abdominal or thoracic surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ary Serpa Neto; Sabrine N T Hemmes; Carmen S V Barbas; Martin Beiderlinden; Ana Fernandez-Bustamante; Emmanuel Futier; Markus W Hollmann; Samir Jaber; Alf Kozian; Marc Licker; Wen-Qian Lin; Pierre Moine; Federica Scavonetto; Thomas Schilling; Gabriele Selmo; Paolo Severgnini; Juraj Sprung; Tanja Treschan; Carmen Unzueta; Toby N Weingarten; Esther K Wolthuis; Hermann Wrigge; Marcelo Gama de Abreu; Paolo Pelosi; Marcus J Schultz
Journal:  Lancet Respir Med       Date:  2014-11-13       Impact factor: 30.700

7.  Physiological effects of the open lung approach during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: focus on driving pressure.

Authors:  Davide D'Antini; Michela Rauseo; Salvatore Grasso; Lucia Mirabella; Luigi Camporota; Antonella Cotoia; Savino Spadaro; Alberto Fersini; Rocco Petta; Rosaria Menga; Alberto Sciusco; Michele Dambrosio; Gilda Cinnella
Journal:  Minerva Anestesiol       Date:  2017-07-05       Impact factor: 3.051

Review 8.  The neglected role of abdominal compliance in organ-organ interactions.

Authors:  Manu L N G Malbrain; Yannick Peeters; Robert Wise
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2016-03-16       Impact factor: 9.097

Review 9.  Conversion of laparoscopic colorectal resection for cancer: What is the impact on short-term outcomes and survival?

Authors:  Marco E Allaix; Edgar J B Furnée; Massimiliano Mistrangelo; Alberto Arezzo; Mario Morino
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-10-07       Impact factor: 5.742

10.  Impact of the patient's body position on the intraabdominal workspace during laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  Jan Paul J Mulier; Bruno Dillemans; Sebastiaan Van Cauwenberge
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-01-07       Impact factor: 4.584

View more
  4 in total

1.  The effect of low- versus normal-pressure pneumoperitoneum during laparoscopic colorectal surgery on the early quality of recovery with perioperative care according to the enhanced recovery principles (RECOVER): study protocol for a randomized controlled study.

Authors:  Kim I Albers; Fatih Polat; Ivo F Panhuizen; Marc M J Snoeck; Gert-Jan Scheffer; Hans D de Boer; Michiel C Warlé
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2020-06-17       Impact factor: 2.279

2.  Effects of a multifaceted individualized pneumoperitoneum strategy in elderly patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal surgery: A retrospective study.

Authors:  Liping Liu; Na Lv; Chunmiao Hou
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 1.817

3.  The effects of moderate neuromuscular blockade combined with transverse abdominal plane block on surgical space conditions during laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a randomized clinical study.

Authors:  Zijin Shen; Lin Zhang; Fang Ke; Cheng Wu; Rong Dong
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2022-04-04       Impact factor: 2.217

4.  A novel method for monitoring abdominal compliance to optimize insufflation pressure during laparoscopy.

Authors:  Frank Sterke; Willem van Weteringen; Lorenzo Ventura; Ilaria Milesi; René M H Wijnen; John Vlot; Raffaele L Dellacà
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2022-07-21       Impact factor: 3.453

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.