Literature DB >> 23863222

Value and limitations of transpulmonary pressure calculations during intra-abdominal hypertension.

Gustavo A Cortes-Puentes1, Kenneth E Gard, Alexander B Adams, Katherine A Faltesek, Christopher P Anderson, David J Dries, John J Marini.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To clarify the effect of progressively increasing intra-abdominal pressure on esophageal pressure, transpulmonary pressure, and functional residual capacity.
DESIGN: Controlled application of increased intra-abdominal pressure at two positive end-expiratory pressure levels (1 and 10 cm H2O) in an anesthetized porcine model of controlled ventilation.
SETTING: Large animal laboratory of a university-affiliated hospital.
SUBJECTS: Eleven deeply anesthetized swine (weight 46.2 ± 6.2 kg).
INTERVENTIONS: Air-regulated intra-abdominal hypertension (0-25 mm Hg). MEASUREMENTS: Esophageal pressure, tidal compliance, bladder pressure, and end-expiratory lung aeration by gas dilution. MAIN
RESULTS: Functional residual capacity was significantly reduced by increasing intra-abdominal pressure at both positive end-expiratory pressure levels (p ≤ 0.0001) without corresponding changes of end-expiratory esophageal pressure. Above intra-abdominal pressure 5 mm Hg, plateau airway pressure increased linearly by ~ 50% of the applied intra-abdominal pressure value, associated with commensurate changes of esophageal pressure. With tidal volume held constant, negligible changes occurred in transpulmonary pressure due to intra-abdominal pressure. Driving pressures calculated from airway pressures alone (plateau airway pressure--positive end-expiratory pressure) did not equate to those computed from transpulmonary pressure (tidal changes in transpulmonary pressure). Increasing positive end-expiratory pressure shifted the predominantly negative end-expiratory transpulmonary pressure at positive end-expiratory pressure 1 cm H2O (mean -3.5 ± 0.4 cm H2O) into the positive range at positive end-expiratory pressure 10 cm H2O (mean 0.58 ± 1.2 cm H2O).
CONCLUSIONS: Despite its insensitivity to changes in functional residual capacity, measuring transpulmonary pressure may be helpful in explaining how different levels of positive end-expiratory pressure influence recruitment and collapse during tidal ventilation in the presence of increased intra-abdominal pressure and in calculating true transpulmonary driving pressure (tidal changes of transpulmonary pressure). Traditional interpretations of respiratory mechanics based on unmodified airway pressure were misleading regarding lung behavior in this setting.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23863222     DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31828a3bea

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Care Med        ISSN: 0090-3493            Impact factor:   7.598


  18 in total

1.  What's new in respiratory physiology? The expanding chest wall revisited!

Authors:  Ola Stenqvist; Luciano Gattinoni; Göran Hedenstierna
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2015-02-12       Impact factor: 17.440

2.  A multifaceted individualized pneumoperitoneum strategy for laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a multicenter observational feasibility study.

Authors:  Oscar Diaz-Cambronero; Blas Flor Lorente; Guido Mazzinari; Maria Vila Montañes; Nuria García Gregorio; Daniel Robles Hernandez; Luis Enrique Olmedilla Arnal; Maria Pilar Argente Navarro; Marcus J Schultz; Carlos L Errando
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-06-27       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Advances in the support of respiratory failure: putting all the evidence together.

Authors:  John J Marini
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2015-12-18       Impact factor: 9.097

Review 4.  Driving Pressure and Transpulmonary Pressure: How Do We Guide Safe Mechanical Ventilation?

Authors:  Elizabeth C Williams; Gabriel C Motta-Ribeiro; Marcos F Vidal Melo
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 7.892

5.  Respiratory mechanical effects of surgical pneumoperitoneum in humans.

Authors:  Stephen H Loring; Negin Behazin; Aileen Novero; Victor Novack; Stephanie B Jones; Carl R O'Donnell; Daniel S Talmor
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2014-09-11

6.  Adjusting tidal volume to stress index in an open lung condition optimizes ventilation and prevents overdistension in an experimental model of lung injury and reduced chest wall compliance.

Authors:  Carlos Ferrando; Fernando Suárez-Sipmann; Andrea Gutierrez; Gerardo Tusman; Jose Carbonell; Marisa García; Laura Piqueras; Desamparados Compañ; Susanie Flores; Marina Soro; Alicia Llombart; Francisco Javier Belda
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2015-01-13       Impact factor: 9.097

7.  Paradoxically Improved Respiratory Compliance With Abdominal Compression in COVID-19 ARDS.

Authors:  Rebecca L Kummer; Robert S Shapiro; John J Marini; Joshua S Huelster; James W Leatherman
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2021-05-21       Impact factor: 9.410

8.  Unilateral mechanical asymmetry: positional effects on lung volumes and transpulmonary pressure.

Authors:  Gustavo A Cortes-Puentes; Kenneth Gard; Joseph C Keenan; Alexander Adams; David Dries; John J Marini
Journal:  Intensive Care Med Exp       Date:  2014-02-05

9.  Abnormal Expression of Urea Transporter Protein in a Rat Model of Hepatorenal Syndrome Induced by Succinylated Gelatin.

Authors:  Weiping Song; Xiaolong Qi; Wenhui Zhang; Yingying Zhao; Yan Cao; Fei Wang; Changqing Yang
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2015-09-28

10.  PEEP titration: the effect of prone position and abdominal pressure in an ARDS model.

Authors:  Joseph C Keenan; Gustavo A Cortes-Puentes; Lei Zhang; Alex B Adams; David J Dries; John J Marini
Journal:  Intensive Care Med Exp       Date:  2018-01-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.