Literature DB >> 29951506

The choice of heart valve prosthesis for aortic valve replacement in the young: about choices and consequences.

Thierry Bove1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2018        PMID： 29951506      PMCID： PMC5994531          DOI： 10.21037/atm.2018.02.22

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Transl Med        ISSN： 2305-5839


× No keyword cloud information.
  15 in total

1.  Accelerated degeneration of a bovine pericardial bioprosthetic aortic valve in children and young adults.

Authors:  Susan F Saleeb; Jane W Newburger; Tal Geva; Christopher W Baird; Kimberlee Gauvreau; Robert F Padera; Pedro J Del Nido; Michele J Borisuk; Stephen P Sanders; John E Mayer
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2014-04-22       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  Transcatheter Valve Underexpansion Limits Leaflet Durability: Implications for Valve-in-Valve Procedures.

Authors:  Caitlin Martin; Wei Sun
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2016-10-12       Impact factor: 3.934

3.  Prosthesis-patient mismatch predicts structural valve degeneration in bioprosthetic heart valves.

Authors:  Willem Flameng; Marie-Christine Herregods; Monique Vercalsteren; Paul Herijgers; Kris Bogaerts; Bart Meuris
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2010-05-03       Impact factor: 29.690

4.  Long-term outcomes of the Ross procedure in adults with severe aortic stenosis: single-centre experience with 20 years of follow-up.

Authors:  David Kalfa; Siamak Mohammadi; Dimitri Kalavrouziotis; Mounir Kharroubi; Daniel Doyle; Mohamed Marzouk; Jacques Metras; Jean Perron
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2014-02-26       Impact factor: 4.191

5.  Very long-term outcomes of the Carpentier-Edwards Perimount valve in aortic position.

Authors:  Thierry Bourguignon; Anne-Lorraine Bouquiaux-Stablo; Pascal Candolfi; Alain Mirza; Claudia Loardi; Marc-Antoine May; Rym El-Khoury; Michel Marchand; Michel Aupart
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2015-01-09       Impact factor: 4.330

6.  Low target-INR anticoagulation is safe in selected aortic valve patients with the Medtronic Open Pivot mechanical prosthesis: long-term results of a propensity-matched comparison with standard anticoagulation.

Authors:  Thierry Bové; Yves Van Belleghem; Katrien François; Frank Caes; Michel De Pauw; Yves Taeymans; Guido J Van Nooten
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2017-06-01

7.  Does the Use of a Decision Aid Improve Decision Making in Prosthetic Heart Valve Selection? A Multicenter Randomized Trial.

Authors:  Nelleke M Korteland; Yunus Ahmed; David R Koolbergen; Marjan Brouwer; Frederiek de Heer; Jolanda Kluin; Eline F Bruggemans; Robert J M Klautz; Anne M Stiggelbout; Jeroen J J Bucx; Jolien W Roos-Hesselink; Peter Polak; Thanasie Markou; Inge van den Broek; Rene Ligthart; Ad J J C Bogers; Johanna J M Takkenberg
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes       Date:  2017-02-22

8.  Comparison of INR stability between self-monitoring and standard laboratory method: preliminary results of a prospective study in 67 mechanical heart valve patients.

Authors:  Claire Dauphin; Benoît Legault; Patricia Jaffeux; Pascal Motreff; Kasra Azarnoush; Hélène Joly; Etienne Geoffroy; Bruno Aublet-Cuvelier; Lionel Camilleri; Jean-René Lusson; Jean Cassagnes; Charles de Riberolles
Journal:  Arch Cardiovasc Dis       Date:  2008-11-22       Impact factor: 2.340

9.  Bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement: Revisiting prosthesis choice in patients younger than 50 years old.

Authors:  Samuel R Schnittman; David H Adams; Shinobu Itagaki; Nana Toyoda; Natalia N Egorova; Joanna Chikwe
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2017-09-13       Impact factor: 5.209

10.  Twenty-year durability of the aortic Hancock II bioprosthesis in young patients: is it durable enough?.

Authors:  Dai Une; Marc Ruel; Tirone E David
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2014-02-07       Impact factor: 4.191
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.