Literature DB >> 29949843

Sex Differences in Cancer: Epidemiology, Genetics and Therapy.

Hae-In Kim1, Hyesol Lim1, Aree Moon1.   

Abstract

The incidence and mortality of various cancers are associated with sex-specific disparities. Sex differences in cancer epidemiology are one of the most significant findings. Men are more prone to die from cancer, particularly hematological malignancies. Sex difference in cancer incidence is attributed to regulation at the genetic/molecular level and sex hormones such as estrogen. At the genetic/molecular level, gene polymorphism and altered enzymes involving drug metabolism generate differences in cancer incidence between men and women. Sex hormones modulate gene expression in various cancers. Genetic or hormonal differences between men and women determine the effect of chemotherapy. Until today, animal studies and clinical trials investigating chemotherapy showed sex imbalance. Chemotherapy has been used without consideration of sex differences, resulting in disparity of efficacy and toxicity between sexes. Based on accumulating evidence supporting sex differences in chemotherapy, all clinical trials in cancer must incorporate sex differences for a better understanding of biological differences between men and women. In the present review, we summarized the sex differences in (1) incidence and mortality of cancer, (2) genetic and molecular basis of cancer, (3) sex hormones in cancer incidence, and (4) efficacy and toxicity of chemotherapy. This review provides useful information for sex-based chemotherapy and development of personalized therapeutic strategies against cancer.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cancer; Chemotherapy; Sex Difference; Sex hormone

Year:  2018        PMID: 29949843      PMCID: PMC6029678          DOI: 10.4062/biomolther.2018.103

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomol Ther (Seoul)        ISSN: 1976-9148            Impact factor:   4.634


INTRODUCTION

Cancer represents a leading cause of death worldwide (Naghavi ). Sex plays a crucial role in the incidence, disease prognosis and mortality in a variety of cancers (Siegel ). The incidence of cancer was about 20% higher in men than in women and the mortality rate was 40% higher in men in the United States from 2009 to 2013 (Siegel ). Sex differences influence cancer susceptibility at the genetic/molecular levels. Sex hormones also negatively or positively affect the development of various cancers. Biological specificities determine the outcome and response to therapy of cancer. During the last decades, animal studies and clinical trials used males alone and excluded females (Keitt ; Becker ; Zucker and Beery, 2010). Altered sex hormones in the menstrual cycle affect the experimental results (Becker ). In addition, the 1977 United States Food and Drug Administration guideline excluded women in clinical research due to the risk of birth defects (Merkatz ). Similar doses were administered to men and women in clinical chemotherapy (Islam ). Accumulating evidence shows sex-specific differences in toxicity and efficacy of chemotherapy (Tran ; Rademaker, 2001; Anderson, 2005; Bren, 2005, Schmetzer and Flörcken, 2012). Especially, women experience higher adverse drug reactions to most anticancer drugs than men (Wang and Huang, 2007). This review summarized studies involving sex differences in epidemiology, sex hormones, and genetic/molecular factors. In addition, we reviewed sex-related differences in chemotherapy using anticancer agents such as 5-fluorouracil (FU), paclitaxel, doxorubicin, cisplatin, bevacizumab and rituximab. This article provides important clues and insights for the precise understanding of sex-specific differences in cancer.

SEX DIFFERENCES IN INCIDENCE AND MORTALITY OF CANCER

Growing evidence shows sex-specific differences in the incidence and mortality associated with various cancers. Prostate, lung, and colorectal cancer occur the most in males, while breast, lung, and colorectal cancer are predominant in females in the United States (Siegel ). In addition to the incidence of cancer in sex-specific organs such as prostate and ovary, sex differences in cancers such as colon, lung, and liver have been reported (Dorak and Karpuzoglu, 2012; Torre ). Thyroid cancer incidence is much higher in females than in males (Dorak and Karpuzoglu, 2012). Cancer incidence involving colorectal, stomach and liver cancer is higher in males than in females (Arnold ). Furthermore, bladder cancer and leukemia have been predominantly diagnosed in males than in females (Fitzmaurice ). In patients with colorectal cancer, women developed right-sided malignancy while men manifested the disease more on the left side (Kim ). Right-sided colon cancer is associated with a higher severity of cancer compared with left-sided disease (Kim ). The cause of disparity in location might be due to differences in estrogen level between men and women. The mortality of cancer is reported to be greater in men than in women (Siegel ). Especially, lung, colorectal and stomach cancers, which are the leading causes of cancer deaths, show higher mortality in men than in women (Siegel ; Fitzmaurice ). Female cancers such as breast, ovarian and uterine corpus cancer result in relatively high mortality (Siegel ; Fitzmaurice ). Men-specific cancers such as prostate cancer also represent prominent causes for cancer death (Siegel ). Mortality associated with esophagus, liver, and bladder cancer is higher in men than in women (Siegel ). Men had a 34% higher risk of death due to melanoma compared with women (Crocetti ). Therefore, mortality from various cancer types shows sex disparity. Lung cancer was the leading cause of cancer death in men in 20th century due to smoking (Siegel ). Lung cancer death was decreased by reduced smoking rates and early detection and treatment from 1991 to 2012 (Siegel ). In both sexes, mortality due to gastric cancer declined rapidly in the 1930s in U.S (Siegel ). Although the cause of dramatic reduction is not completely understood, the control of Helicobacter pylori infection, and better methods of food preservation resulted in a reduction of mortality due to stomach cancer (Bertuccio ; Siegel ).

SEX DIFFERENCES IN GENETIC AND MOLECULAR BASIS OF CANCER

In genetic and molecular studies, susceptibility to disease varies across the sexes. Genetic and molecular disparities between males and females contribute to differences in the incidence of a variety of cancers. Men show a higher incidence of bladder cancer than women (Siegel ). The lower incidence of bladder cancer in women was correlated with the sulfotransferase 1A1 (SULT1A1) Histidine (His) genotype (Zheng ). Genetic polymorphism of SULT1A1 showed alteration from Arginine to His, which was triggered by A-to-G transition (Raftogianis ). It was reported that the His213 allele genotype SULT1A1 significantly decreased the risk of bladder cancer exclusively in women (Zheng ). Therefore, this gene might be associated with a protective role in women diagnosed with bladder cancer (Dorak and Karpuzoglu, 2012). Genetic polymorphism, which is linked to drug metabolizing enzymes, influences the risk of carcinogenesis (Bolufer ). For example, acute leukemia has a higher rate of incidence in men than in women (Bolufer ). It was reported that men with deletion of glutathione s-methyltransferase T1 (GSTT1), which is a glutathione s-methyltransferase polymorphism, underwent phase 2 metabolism and detected frequently in acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) than men with normal GSTT1 (Mannervik and Danielson, 1988; Hayes and Strange, 2000; Bolufer ). Deletion of GSTT1 gene abrogated the enzyme activity (Arand ). NAD(P)H:quinone oxidoreductase 1 (NQO1) catalyzes free radical detoxification (Traver ). NQO1 polymorphism with substitution of C to T base pair at position 609 of NQO1 decreases the activity of the enzyme (Asher ; Fagerholm ). NQO1 polymorphism showed a higher incidence of ALL only in males, but not in females (Bolufer ). Murine double minute 2 (MDM2) downregulates the expression of p53 protein, a tumor suppressor (Eliyahu ; Bond ). A single nucleotide polymorphism 309 (SNP 309) in MDM2 promotor increases the affinity of the transcriptional activator Sp1, which enhances the expression of MDM2 and consequently leads to attenuation of p53 pathway (Bond ). Attenuation of p53 DNA damage response occurs in the presence of both wild-type allele of p53 and G-allele of SNP 309 (Bond ). In addition, estrogen signaling affects the level of MDM2 (Bond ). In the diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), sporadic soft-tissue sarcoma, and highly invasive estrogen receptor-positive ductal carcinoma, estrogen signaling pathway increases tumor formation directly or indirectly in women carrying the Gallele of SNP309 (Bond ). Taken together, genetic and molecular differences might influence the disparity of the risk of cancer between men and women.

SEX DIFFERENCES IN SEX HORMONES IN CANCER INCIDENCE

Sex hormones might contribute to differences in the incidence of cancer between men and women (Do ; Dorak and Karpuzoglu, 2012). ALL is more likely to occur in men because of limited estrogen level (Do ). Estrogen plays a role in the inhibition of nuclear factor kappa B (NF-κB). NF-κB regulates the transcription of interferon regulatory factor 4 (IRF4) (Do ). IRF4 is involved in the differentiation of B and T cells and is overexpressed in B-cell malignancies as a result of NF-κB hyperactivation (Do ). IRF4 polymorphisms are related with the incidence of ALL (Do ). Thus, a combination of intronic polymorphism of IRF4 and lack of estrogen might predispose men to leukemia. Estrogen is linked closely to a higher rate of thyroid cancer development in women (Lee ; Dorak and Karpuzoglu, 2012). Estrogen increases the proliferation of human thyroid papillary carcinoma cell line and promotes the expression of B-cell lymphoma-extra large (Bcl-XL), which is known as an anti-apoptotic protein (Hsu ; Lee ), compared with testosterone. Endogenous female sex hormone such as progestin increase excretion of bile acid, which has been suggested as a potential inducer of colon cancer (McMichael and Potter, 1980; Farhana ). Exogenous estrogen decreased the production of secondary bile acid which is responsible for promoting malignant change in colonic epithelium (McMichael and Potter, 1980; Everson ; Grodstein ). Therefore, female sex hormones may play a protective role in the development of colon cancer, by decreasing the level of bile acid (McMichael and Potter, 1980; Farhana ).

SEX DIFFERENCES IN EFFICACY AND TOXICITY OF CHEMOTHERAPY

Sex-related differences at the genetic and molecular levels also affect the differences in the degree of drug response (Wang and Huang, 2007). Although sex disparities in the incidence and mortality of cancer have been observed for a variety of cancers, chemotherapy has been conducted independent of sex (Keitt ; Becker ; Zucker and Beery, 2010). Research involving animal model and clinical trials has been almost male-oriented. Accumulating evidence supports sex-related response to chemotherapeutic agents. Anticancer drugs, which represent sex differences in efficacy and toxicity, are summarized and listed in Table 1.
Table 1.

Anticancer drugs with sex differences in efficacy and toxicity

DrugSex differencesReferences
5-fluorouracilClearance is higher in males than in femalesMilano et al., 1992
Females experienced higher toxicity (including stomatitis, leukopenia, alopecia and diarrhea) frequently and severely than malesSloan et al., 2002
PaclitaxelFemales showed lower elimination than malesJoerger et al., 2006
Peripheral compartment of females is saturated at lower plasma concentrations levels compared with malesJoerger et al., 2006
Elimination is faster in males than in femalesJoerger et al., 2006
Females experienced severe leukopenia greater than malesSchmetzer and Flörcken, 2012; Yamamoto et al., 2008
Females showed longer median progression-free survival than malesYamamoto et al., 2008
DoxorubicinMales have significantly higher clearance than femalesDobbs et al., 1995
Females experienced higher risk of early cardiotoxicity than males following treatment with doxorubicin in childhood leukemiaLipshultz et al., 1995
CisplatinFemales experienced higher toxicities including vomiting and nausea than malesLiaw et al., 2001
Male rats showed prolonged heat latency and slower motor nerve conduction than female ratsWongtawatchai et al., 2009
The half-maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) of male cell lines was lower than that of femalesHuang et al., 2007
BevacizumabClearance was higher in males than in femalesLu et al., 2008
Female experienced more severe hypertension and neutropenia, and higher rate of abdominal pain than malesBrahmer et al., 2011
Females experienced higher rates of abdominal pain than malesBrahmer et al., 2011
RituximabClearance was higher in males than in femaleMüller et al., 2012
Half-life of elimination in male was longer compared with femalesMüller et al., 2012
The better responses from treatment and outcomes were more prominent in females than in malesRiihijärvi et al., 2011
Male patients had a worse progression-free survival than female patients both in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma and follicular lymphomaRiihijärvi et al., 2011

5-FU

In the treatment of various cancers, 5-FU has been widely used as an effective chemotherapy (Longley ). 5-FU as a pyrimidine antagonist inhibits thymidine synthase which is essential for DNA synthesis (Santi ; Yoshioka ; Longley ). It has been observed that 5-FU might elicit different toxicities depending on sex (Stein ; Sloan ). Clearance of 5-FU is higher in male (179 l/h/m2) than in female (155 l/h/m2) (Milano ). Low clearance of 5-FU in females can result in higher toxicity (Wang and Huang, 2007). Dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) breaks down 5-FU (Wasternack, 1980; Diasio and Harris, 1989; Longley ). DPD plays a crucial role in toxicity associated with 5-FU chemotherapy (Harris ). The activity of DPD was decreased in female and the difference in DPD activity between males and females is 15% (Etienne ). A lower DPD activity associated with toxicity in women might be attributed to DPD deficiency syndrome (Milano ). Reduced degradation of 5-FU in female influences therapeutic efficacy and toxicity (Mader, 2007). In 5-FU-based chemotherapy, women experimented higher toxicities, including stomatitis, leukopenia, alopecia, and diarrhea, more frequently and severely than men (Sloan ).

Paclitaxel

Antitumor effects of paclitaxel, which inhibits depolymerization of cytoskeletal microtubules, interfere with cell division (Schiff and Horwitz, 1980; Jordan and Wilson, 2004). It was reported that female patients with solid tumors have 20% lower elimination of paclitaxel than male patients (Joerger ). Peripheral compartments of female (0.83 mmol/l) are saturated at lower plasma concentrations compared with those of male (1.74 mmol/l) (Joerger ). On the other hand, paclitaxel elimination is faster in male (≤0.5 h) than in female (≤1 h) (Joerger ). In the treatment with paclitaxel combined with carboplatin, the number of female patients exhibiting toxicity such as severe leukopenia was greater than that of male patients (Yamamoto ; Schmetzer and Flörcken, 2012). Conversely, female patients diagnosed with lung carcinoma (5.3 months) who were treated with paclitaxel combined with carboplatin showed longer median progression-free survival (PFS) rate than male patients (4.4 months) (Yamamoto ). These sex-related differences might be explained by DNA repair, which was lower in females than in males (Wei ). The lower DNA repair ability might affect tumor cell in female after administering cytotoxic anticancer drug and influence the prolonged PFS in female patients (Yamamoto ).

Doxorubicin

Doxorubicin is an anthracycline DNA-damaging agent that targets the topoisomerase 2 activity and DNA intercalation (Gewirtz, 1999; Rivankar, 2014; Mitry and Edwards, 2016). Another predicted mechanism of doxorubicin generates free radicals resulting in damage to membrane and DNA of cancer cell (Gewirtz, 1999; Rivankar, 2014; Mitry and Edwards, 2016). In patients with breast cancer or lymphoma, male with normal liver function showed significantly higher doxorubicin clearance (59 l/h/m2) than female (27 l/h/m2) (Dobbs ). Female might be an independent risk factor increasing the toxicity of doxorubicin such as cardiac abnormalities (Lipshultz , 1995). Exposure to doxorubicin in childhood leukemia in females increases the risk of early cardiotoxicity compared with in males (Lipshultz ). P-glycoprotein, which is expressed by multidrug resistance protein 1 gene, is a drug transporter that pumps many foreign substances out of cells (Schuetz ). Expression of p-glycoprotein in males is 2-fold higher than in females (Schuetz ). In females, doxorubicin and doxorubicinol, which is a doxorubicin metabolite, accumulate following a reduced expression of p-glycoprotein and leads to cardiotoxicity (van Asperen ). Disparities in drug metabolizing enzymes between men and women might have an impact on drug metabolism or volume of distribution of doxorubicin (Frisancho, 1974; Ley ; Lipshultz ). Doxorubicin is not accumulated at a higher concentration in adipose tissue (Rodvold , Lipshultz ). The higher proportion of fat in female patients might lead to a higher concentration of doxorubicin in non-adipose tissues such as heart in women even if men and women carried the same body surface areas.

Cisplatin

Cisplatin as cis-diamminedichloroplatinum (II) exhibits covalent bonding with adjacent guanines located in the major groove of DNA (Bellon ). This intra-strand cross-links with DNA result in distortion of DNA and antitumor effects. Female patients treated with cisplatin-based therapy show substantially higher toxicities such as vomiting and nausea than males (Liaw ). Male rats treated with cisplatin show general toxicity, prolonged thermal latency and slow motor nerve conduction velocity than female rats (Wongtawatchai ). Sex-dependent difference may not be related to lower body size in females but physiological variables such as distinct body composition and metabolic activity (Wongtawatchai ). In the Yoruban population which comprised of African descent, male-derived cell lines demonstrated higher sensitivity to cisplatin than female-derived cell lines (Huang ). The half-maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) of cisplatin in male-derived cell lines was lower than that in female-derived cell lines (Huang ).

Bevacizumab

Bevacizumab is a monoclonal antibody, which blocks vascular endothelial growth factor and inhibits angiogenesis in tumors (Ferrara, 2004; Sandler ). It was reported that clearance of bevacizumab was 26% higher in male patients with solid tumors than in female patients, which is associated with a greater muscle mass in males than in females (Lu ). Chemotherapy with bevacizumab for non-small cell lung cancer led to more severe hypertension and neutropenia and higher rate of abdominal pain in female patients than in male patients (Brahmer ).

Rituximab

Rituximab is a monoclonal antibody, which targets CD20 on B cell surface. It is used to treat autoimmune diseases and hematological cancers such as non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma and chronic lymphocytic leukemia. The clearance of rituximab is higher in male patients (8.21 ml/h) with DLBCL than in female patients (12.68 ml/h) and the elimination half-life in male patients (t1/2β=30.7 days) is longer compared with female patients (t1/2β=24.7 days) (Müller ). In the DLBCL treatment with rituximab, the better treatment outcomes were more prominent in females than in males (Riihijärvi ). GSTT1 deletion might be related to adverse prognosis only in DLBCL male patients who are treated with rituximab (Cho ). Also, in the treatment with rituximab, male patients had a worse PFS than female patients both in DLBCL and in follicular lymphoma (Riihijärvi ).

CONCLUSIONS

The present review highlights the importance of sex differences in the epidemiology and chemotherapy of cancer. Evidence supports sex differences in efficacy and toxicity to anticancer drugs based on individual pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. Data suggest that sex influences pathophysiology, clinical signs, treatment outcome and response in cancer. Sex is a crucial factor in predicting chemotherapy outcome, with implications for therapeutic efficacy and toxicity. Our review provides supporting information for appropriate chemotherapy based on sex. Based on the plethora of studies reporting potential sex differences in cancer, cancer research and therapy should be considered specifically to enhance patient outcomes. Sex difference in cancer susceptibility can be used to develop a causal hypothesis for the disease, or to define subgroups at the highest risk for preventive action. Sex plays a crucial role in improving individual pharmacogenomics and in developing personalized therapeutic medicines. Pharmacogenomic differences between the sexes might play a significant role in chemotherapy in the future. Further studies are needed to provide greater insight into sex differences in cancer and improve treatment outcomes with anticancer agents.
  77 in total

1.  Males still dominate animal studies.

Authors:  Irving Zucker; Annaliese K Beery
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2010-06-10       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Sex differences in outcome with bevacizumab therapy: analysis of patients with advanced-stage non-small cell lung cancer treated with or without bevacizumab in combination with paclitaxel and carboplatin in the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Trial 4599.

Authors:  Julie R Brahmer; Suzanne E Dahlberg; Robert J Gray; Joan H Schiller; Michael C Perry; Alan Sandler; David H Johnson
Journal:  J Thorac Oncol       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 15.609

Review 3.  Sex and racial differences in pharmacological response: where is the evidence? Pharmacogenetics, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics.

Authors:  Gail D Anderson
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2005 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.681

4.  Age and sex are independent predictors of 5-fluorouracil toxicity. Analysis of a large scale phase III trial.

Authors:  B N Stein; N J Petrelli; H O Douglass; D L Driscoll; G Arcangeli; N J Meropol
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1995-01-01       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  Mechanisms of gallstone formation in women. Effects of exogenous estrogen (Premarin) and dietary cholesterol on hepatic lipid metabolism.

Authors:  G T Everson; C McKinley; F Kern
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 14.808

6.  Gender affects doxorubicin pharmacokinetics in patients with normal liver biochemistry.

Authors:  N A Dobbs; C J Twelves; H Gillies; C A James; P G Harper; R D Rubens
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 3.333

7.  Taxol stabilizes microtubules in mouse fibroblast cells.

Authors:  P B Schiff; S B Horwitz
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1980-03       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 8.  Pharmacogenomics of sex difference in chemotherapeutic toxicity.

Authors:  Jeffrey Wang; Ying Huang
Journal:  Curr Drug Discov Technol       Date:  2007-06

9.  Increased accumulation of doxorubicin and doxorubicinol in cardiac tissue of mice lacking mdr1a P-glycoprotein.

Authors:  J van Asperen; O van Tellingen; F Tijssen; A H Schinkel; J H Beijnen
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Global, Regional, and National Cancer Incidence, Mortality, Years of Life Lost, Years Lived With Disability, and Disability-Adjusted Life-years for 32 Cancer Groups, 1990 to 2015: A Systematic Analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study.

Authors:  Christina Fitzmaurice; Christine Allen; Ryan M Barber; Lars Barregard; Zulfiqar A Bhutta; Hermann Brenner; Daniel J Dicker; Odgerel Chimed-Orchir; Rakhi Dandona; Lalit Dandona; Tom Fleming; Mohammad H Forouzanfar; Jamie Hancock; Roderick J Hay; Rachel Hunter-Merrill; Chantal Huynh; H Dean Hosgood; Catherine O Johnson; Jost B Jonas; Jagdish Khubchandani; G Anil Kumar; Michael Kutz; Qing Lan; Heidi J Larson; Xiaofeng Liang; Stephen S Lim; Alan D Lopez; Michael F MacIntyre; Laurie Marczak; Neal Marquez; Ali H Mokdad; Christine Pinho; Farshad Pourmalek; Joshua A Salomon; Juan Ramon Sanabria; Logan Sandar; Benn Sartorius; Stephen M Schwartz; Katya A Shackelford; Kenji Shibuya; Jeff Stanaway; Caitlyn Steiner; Jiandong Sun; Ken Takahashi; Stein Emil Vollset; Theo Vos; Joseph A Wagner; Haidong Wang; Ronny Westerman; Hajo Zeeb; Leo Zoeckler; Foad Abd-Allah; Muktar Beshir Ahmed; Samer Alabed; Noore K Alam; Saleh Fahed Aldhahri; Girma Alem; Mulubirhan Assefa Alemayohu; Raghib Ali; Rajaa Al-Raddadi; Azmeraw Amare; Yaw Amoako; Al Artaman; Hamid Asayesh; Niguse Atnafu; Ashish Awasthi; Huda Ba Saleem; Aleksandra Barac; Neeraj Bedi; Isabela Bensenor; Adugnaw Berhane; Eduardo Bernabé; Balem Betsu; Agnes Binagwaho; Dube Boneya; Ismael Campos-Nonato; Carlos Castañeda-Orjuela; Ferrán Catalá-López; Peggy Chiang; Chioma Chibueze; Abdulaal Chitheer; Jee-Young Choi; Benjamin Cowie; Solomon Damtew; José das Neves; Suhojit Dey; Samath Dharmaratne; Preet Dhillon; Eric Ding; Tim Driscoll; Donatus Ekwueme; Aman Yesuf Endries; Maryam Farvid; Farshad Farzadfar; Joao Fernandes; Florian Fischer; Tsegaye Tewelde G/Hiwot; Alemseged Gebru; Sameer Gopalani; Alemayehu Hailu; Masako Horino; Nobuyuki Horita; Abdullatif Husseini; Inge Huybrechts; Manami Inoue; Farhad Islami; Mihajlo Jakovljevic; Spencer James; Mehdi Javanbakht; Sun Ha Jee; Amir Kasaeian; Muktar Sano Kedir; Yousef S Khader; Young-Ho Khang; Daniel Kim; James Leigh; Shai Linn; Raimundas Lunevicius; Hassan Magdy Abd El Razek; Reza Malekzadeh; Deborah Carvalho Malta; Wagner Marcenes; Desalegn Markos; Yohannes A Melaku; Kidanu G Meles; Walter Mendoza; Desalegn Tadese Mengiste; Tuomo J Meretoja; Ted R Miller; Karzan Abdulmuhsin Mohammad; Alireza Mohammadi; Shafiu Mohammed; Maziar Moradi-Lakeh; Gabriele Nagel; Devina Nand; Quyen Le Nguyen; Sandra Nolte; Felix A Ogbo; Kelechi E Oladimeji; Eyal Oren; Mahesh Pa; Eun-Kee Park; David M Pereira; Dietrich Plass; Mostafa Qorbani; Amir Radfar; Anwar Rafay; Mahfuzar Rahman; Saleem M Rana; Kjetil Søreide; Maheswar Satpathy; Monika Sawhney; Sadaf G Sepanlou; Masood Ali Shaikh; Jun She; Ivy Shiue; Hirbo Roba Shore; Mark G Shrime; Samuel So; Samir Soneji; Vasiliki Stathopoulou; Konstantinos Stroumpoulis; Muawiyyah Babale Sufiyan; Bryan L Sykes; Rafael Tabarés-Seisdedos; Fentaw Tadese; Bemnet Amare Tedla; Gizachew Assefa Tessema; J S Thakur; Bach Xuan Tran; Kingsley Nnanna Ukwaja; Benjamin S Chudi Uzochukwu; Vasiliy Victorovich Vlassov; Elisabete Weiderpass; Mamo Wubshet Terefe; Henock Gebremedhin Yebyo; Hassen Hamid Yimam; Naohiro Yonemoto; Mustafa Z Younis; Chuanhua Yu; Zoubida Zaidi; Maysaa El Sayed Zaki; Zerihun Menlkalew Zenebe; Christopher J L Murray; Mohsen Naghavi
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2017-04-01       Impact factor: 31.777

View more
  52 in total

1.  Sexually dimorphic radiogenomic models identify distinct imaging and biological pathways that are prognostic of overall survival in glioblastoma.

Authors:  Niha Beig; Salendra Singh; Kaustav Bera; Prateek Prasanna; Gagandeep Singh; Jonathan Chen; Anas Saeed Bamashmos; Addison Barnett; Kyle Hunter; Volodymyr Statsevych; Virginia B Hill; Vinay Varadan; Anant Madabhushi; Manmeet S Ahluwalia; Pallavi Tiwari
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2021-02-25       Impact factor: 12.300

2.  Cost-effectiveness analysis of gemcitabine plus cisplatin versus fluorouracil plus cisplatin in the first-line setting for Chinese patients with metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Authors:  Chaohui Jin; Hanrui Zheng; Mei Zhan; Feng Wen; Ting Xu
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2019-11-12       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Neonatal Exposure to BPA, BDE-99, and PCB Produces Persistent Changes in Hepatic Transcriptome Associated With Gut Dysbiosis in Adult Mouse Livers.

Authors:  Joe Jongpyo Lim; Moumita Dutta; Joseph L Dempsey; Hans-Joachim Lehmler; James MacDonald; Theo Bammler; Cheryl Walker; Terrance J Kavanagh; Haiwei Gu; Sridhar Mani; Julia Yue Cui
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2021-10-27       Impact factor: 4.109

Review 4.  Sex Differences in Cancer Genomes: Much Learned, More Unknown.

Authors:  Chenghao Zhu; Paul C Boutros
Journal:  Endocrinology       Date:  2021-11-01       Impact factor: 5.051

Review 5.  Colon Cancer: From Epidemiology to Prevention.

Authors:  Kyriaki Katsaounou; Elpiniki Nicolaou; Paris Vogazianos; Cameron Brown; Marios Stavrou; Savvas Teloni; Pantelis Hatzis; Agapios Agapiou; Elisavet Fragkou; Georgios Tsiaoussis; George Potamitis; Apostolos Zaravinos; Chrysafis Andreou; Athos Antoniades; Christos Shiammas; Yiorgos Apidianakis
Journal:  Metabolites       Date:  2022-05-30

Review 6.  Understanding sex differences in the regulation of cancer-induced muscle wasting.

Authors:  Ryan N Montalvo; Brittany R Counts; James A Carson
Journal:  Curr Opin Support Palliat Care       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 2.302

Review 7.  Sexual dimorphism in solid and hematological malignancies.

Authors:  Isabel Ben-Batalla; María Elena Vargas-Delgado; Lara Meier; Sonja Loges
Journal:  Semin Immunopathol       Date:  2018-10-25       Impact factor: 9.623

8.  Fatal Infections Among Cancer Patients: A Population-Based Study in the United States.

Authors:  Yongqiang Zheng; Ying Chen; Kaixu Yu; Yun Yang; Xindi Wang; Xue Yang; Jiaxin Qian; Ze-Xian Liu; Bian Wu
Journal:  Infect Dis Ther       Date:  2021-03-24

Review 9.  Cardiovascular magnetic resonance in women with cardiovascular disease: position statement from the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (SCMR).

Authors:  Karen G Ordovas; Lauren A Baldassarre; Chiara Bucciarelli-Ducci; James Carr; Juliano Lara Fernandes; Vanessa M Ferreira; Luba Frank; Sophie Mavrogeni; Ntobeko Ntusi; Ellen Ostenfeld; Purvi Parwani; Alessia Pepe; Subha V Raman; Hajime Sakuma; Jeanette Schulz-Menger; Lilia M Sierra-Galan; Anne Marie Valente; Monvadi B Srichai
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2021-05-10       Impact factor: 5.364

10.  A Classification Approach for Cancer Survivors from Those Cancer-Free, Based on Health Behaviors: Analysis of the Lifelines Cohort.

Authors:  Francisco O Cortés-Ibañez; Sunil Belur Nagaraj; Ludo Cornelissen; Grigory Sidorenkov; Geertruida H de Bock
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-12       Impact factor: 6.639

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.