Literature DB >> 15692274

Sex and racial differences in pharmacological response: where is the evidence? Pharmacogenetics, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics.

Gail D Anderson1.   

Abstract

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) reviewed 300 new drug applications between 1995 and 2000. Of the 163 that included a sex analysis, 11 drugs showed a >40% difference in pharmacokinetics between males and females, which was listed on the product label, yet no dosing recommendations were made based on sex. Female sex has been shown to be a risk factor for clinically relevant adverse drug reactions. Would simply dosing females based on their different pharmacokinetics decrease the incidence of adverse events? The answer is not known. Sex-dependent pharmacodynamic effects have been identified. The role of pharmacokinetics vs. pharmacodynamics is unclear, as is the impact of pharmacogenetics on both. This review highlights a few specific examples in each area in which sex differences in pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics are important and provides recommendations for additional needed research.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15692274     DOI: 10.1089/jwh.2005.14.19

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)        ISSN: 1540-9996            Impact factor:   2.681


  82 in total

1.  Sex and gender differences in health. Science & Society Series on Sex and Science.

Authors:  Vera Regitz-Zagrosek
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2012-06-29       Impact factor: 8.807

2.  Sex bias in trials and treatment must end.

Authors:  Alison M Kim; Candace M Tingen; Teresa K Woodruff
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2010-06-10       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Books: Invisible Women: Exposing Data Bias in a World Designed For Men: Mind the Gap.

Authors:  Fiona Baskett
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2020-04-30       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 4.  Ethnic or racial differences revisited: impact of dosage regimen and dosage form on pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics.

Authors:  Mei-Ling Chen
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 6.447

5.  Comparative Toxicity by Sex Among Children Treated for Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: A Report From the Children's Oncology Group.

Authors:  Kathleen A Meeske; Lingyun Ji; David R Freyer; Paul Gaynon; Kathleen Ruccione; Anna Butturini; Vassilios I Avramis; Stuart Siegel; Yousif Matloub; Nita L Seibel; Richard Sposto
Journal:  Pediatr Blood Cancer       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 3.167

6.  Gender does matter in clinical research.

Authors:  Florence Thibaut
Journal:  Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci       Date:  2017-04-07       Impact factor: 5.270

7.  Considering Sex as a Biological Variable Will Be Valuable for Neuroscience Research.

Authors:  Rebecca M Shansky; Catherine S Woolley
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2016-11-23       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 8.  Linking the Epigenome with Exposure Effects and Susceptibility: The Epigenetic Seed and Soil Model.

Authors:  Emma C Bowers; Shaun D McCullough
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2016-10-20       Impact factor: 4.849

Review 9.  Pharmacotherapy for mood disorders in pregnancy: a review of pharmacokinetic changes and clinical recommendations for therapeutic drug monitoring.

Authors:  Kristina M Deligiannidis; Nancy Byatt; Marlene P Freeman
Journal:  J Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 3.153

10.  Sex differences in spontaneous reports on adverse bleeding events of antithrombotic treatment.

Authors:  Diana M Rydberg; Lennart Holm; Stefan Mejyr; Desirée Loikas; Karin Schenck-Gustafsson; Mia von Euler; Björn Wettermark; Rickard E Malmström
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2013-10-06       Impact factor: 2.953

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.