Literature DB >> 29948401

Real-time, intraoperative detection of residual breast cancer in lumpectomy cavity walls using a novel cathepsin-activated fluorescent imaging system.

Barbara L Smith1,2, Michele A Gadd3, Conor R Lanahan3, Upahvan Rai3, Rong Tang3, Travis Rice-Stitt4, Andrea L Merrill3, David B Strasfeld5, Jorge M Ferrer5, Elena F Brachtel4, Michelle C Specht3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Obtaining tumor-free surgical margins is critical to prevent recurrence in breast-conserving surgery but it remains challenging. We assessed the LUM Imaging System for real-time, intraoperative detection of residual tumor.
METHODS: Lumpectomy cavity walls and excised specimens of breast cancer lumpectomy patients were assessed with the LUM Imaging System (Lumicell, Inc., Wellesley MA) with and without intravenous LUM015, a cathepsin-activatable fluorescent agent. Fluorescence at potential sites of residual tumor was evaluated with a sterile hand-held probe, displayed on a monitor and correlated with histopathology.
RESULTS: Background autofluorescence was assessed in excised specimens from 9 patients who did not receive LUM015. In vivo lumpectomy cavities and excised specimens were then imaged in 15 women undergoing breast cancer surgery who received no LUM015, 0.5, or 1 mg/kg LUM015 (5 women per dose). Among these, 11 patients had invasive carcinoma with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and 4 had only DCIS. Image acquisition took 1 s for each 2.6-cm-diameter surface. No significant background normal breast fluorescence was identified. Elevated fluorescent signal was seen from invasive cancers and DCIS. Mean tumor-to-normal signal ratios were 4.70 ± 1.23 at 0.5 mg/kg and 4.22 ± 0.9 at 1.0 mg/kg (p = 0.54). Tumor was distinguished from normal tissue in pre-and postmenopausal women and readings were not affected by breast density. Some benign tissues produced fluorescent signal with LUM015.
CONCLUSION: The LUM Imaging System allows rapid identification of residual tumor in the lumpectomy cavity of breast cancer patients and may reduce rates of positive margins.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast cancer; Image-guided surgery; Intraoperative tumor detection; Lumpectomy surgery

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29948401      PMCID: PMC6193492          DOI: 10.1007/s10549-018-4845-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 0167-6806            Impact factor:   4.872


  25 in total

1.  The safety of multiple re-excisions after lumpectomy for breast cancer.

Authors:  Suzanne Coopey; Barbara L Smith; Stephanie Hanson; Julliette Buckley; Kevin S Hughes; Michele Gadd; Michelle C Specht
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2011-06-01       Impact factor: 5.344

2.  Intraoperative frozen section analysis for breast-conserving therapy in 1016 patients with breast cancer.

Authors:  O Riedl; F Fitzal; N Mader; P Dubsky; M Rudas; M Mittlboeck; M Gnant; R Jakesz
Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol       Date:  2008-08-15       Impact factor: 4.424

Review 3.  Effects of radiotherapy and of differences in the extent of surgery for early breast cancer on local recurrence and 15-year survival: an overview of the randomised trials.

Authors:  M Clarke; R Collins; S Darby; C Davies; P Elphinstone; V Evans; J Godwin; R Gray; C Hicks; S James; E MacKinnon; P McGale; T McHugh; R Peto; C Taylor; Y Wang
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2005-12-17       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Variability in reexcision following breast conservation surgery.

Authors:  Laurence E McCahill; Richard M Single; Erin J Aiello Bowles; Heather S Feigelson; Ted A James; Tom Barney; Jessica M Engel; Adedayo A Onitilo
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2012-02-01       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  A Study of the Growth Patterns of Breast Carcinoma Using 3D Reconstruction: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Andrea L Merrill; Julliette Buckley; Rong Tang; Elena Brachtel; Upahvan Rai; James Michaelson; Amy Ly; Michelle C Specht; Yukako Yagi; Barbara L Smith
Journal:  Breast J       Date:  2016-11-17       Impact factor: 2.431

6.  Role for intraoperative margin assessment in patients undergoing breast-conserving surgery.

Authors:  Neslihan Cabioglu; Kelly K Hunt; Aysegul A Sahin; Henry M Kuerer; Gildy V Babiera; S Eva Singletary; Gary J Whitman; Merrick I Ross; Frederick C Ames; Barry W Feig; Thomas A Buchholz; Funda Meric-Bernstam
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2007-01-28       Impact factor: 5.344

7.  A mouse-human phase 1 co-clinical trial of a protease-activated fluorescent probe for imaging cancer.

Authors:  Melodi Javid Whitley; Diana M Cardona; Alexander L Lazarides; Ivan Spasojevic; Jorge M Ferrer; Joan Cahill; Chang-Lung Lee; Matija Snuderl; Dan G Blazer; E Shelley Hwang; Rachel A Greenup; Paul J Mosca; Jeffrey K Mito; Kyle C Cuneo; Nicole A Larrier; Erin K O'Reilly; Richard F Riedel; William C Eward; David B Strasfeld; Dai Fukumura; Rakesh K Jain; W David Lee; Linda G Griffith; Moungi G Bawendi; David G Kirsch; Brian E Brigman
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2016-01-06       Impact factor: 17.956

8.  Near-infrared autofluorescence imaging for detection of cancer.

Authors:  Stavros G Demos; Regina Gandour-Edwards; Rajen Ramsamooj; Ralph deVere White
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2004 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.170

9.  Intraoperative detection and removal of microscopic residual sarcoma using wide-field imaging.

Authors:  Jeffrey K Mito; Jorge M Ferrer; Brian E Brigman; Chang-Lung Lee; Rebecca D Dodd; William C Eward; Lisa F Marshall; Kyle C Cuneo; Jessica E Carter; Shalini Ramasunder; Yongbaek Kim; W David Lee; Linda G Griffith; Moungi G Bawendi; David G Kirsch
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2012-03-21       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  Auto-fluorescence lifetime and light reflectance spectroscopy for breast cancer diagnosis: potential tools for intraoperative margin detection.

Authors:  Vikrant Sharma; Shivaranjani Shivalingaiah; Yan Peng; David Euhus; Zygmunt Gryczynski; Hanli Liu
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2012-07-09       Impact factor: 3.732

View more
  19 in total

1.  Optical imaging with a novel cathepsin-activatable probe for enhanced detection of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Shadi A Esfahani; Pedram Heidari; Melanie H Kucherlapati; Jorge M Ferrer; Raju S Kucherlapati; Umar Mahmood
Journal:  Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2019-10-15

2.  Fluorescence Image-Guided Surgery - a Perspective on Contrast Agent Development.

Authors:  Connor W Barth; Summer L Gibbs
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2020-02-19

Review 3.  Development of intraoperative assessment of margins in breast conserving surgery: a narrative review.

Authors:  Wanheng Li; Xiru Li
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2022-01

Review 4.  Fundamentals and developments in fluorescence-guided cancer surgery.

Authors:  J Sven D Mieog; Friso B Achterberg; Aimen Zlitni; Merlijn Hutteman; Jacobus Burggraaf; Rutger-Jan Swijnenburg; Sylvain Gioux; Alexander L Vahrmeijer
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2021-09-07       Impact factor: 66.675

Review 5.  Cysteine Cathepsins in Breast Cancer: Promising Targets for Fluorescence-Guided Surgery.

Authors:  Daan G J Linders; Okker D Bijlstra; Laura C Fallert; Denise E Hilling; Ethan Walker; Brian Straight; Taryn L March; A Rob P M Valentijn; Martin Pool; Jacobus Burggraaf; James P Basilion; Alexander L Vahrmeijer; Peter J K Kuppen
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2022-08-24       Impact factor: 3.484

6.  ASO Author Reflections: Image-Guided Margin Assessment for Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Barbara L Smith; Bridget N Kelly; Michele A Gadd
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-03-16       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 7.  Nanomedicine for Acute Brain Injuries: Insight from Decades of Cancer Nanomedicine.

Authors:  Rebecca M Kandell; Lauren E Waggoner; Ester J Kwon
Journal:  Mol Pharm       Date:  2020-06-25       Impact factor: 4.939

Review 8.  Intraoperative molecular imaging clinical trials: a review of 2020 conference proceedings.

Authors:  Feredun Azari; Gregory Kennedy; Elizabeth Bernstein; Constantinos Hadjipanayis; Alexander Vahrmeijer; Barbara Smith; Eben Rosenthal; Baran Sumer; Jie Tian; Eric Henderson; Amy Lee; Quyen Nguyen; Summer Gibbs; Brian Pogue; Daniel Orringer; Cleopatra Charalampaki; Linda Martin; Janos Tanyi; Major Lee; John Y Lee; Sunil Singhal
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2021-05       Impact factor: 3.170

Review 9.  Image-guided tumor surgery: The emerging role of nanotechnology.

Authors:  Nicholas E Wojtynek; Aaron M Mohs
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Nanomed Nanobiotechnol       Date:  2020-03-11

10.  Clinically translatable formulation strategies for systemic administration of nerve-specific probes.

Authors:  Connor W Barth; Vidhi M Shah; Lei G Wang; Alexander L Antaris; Alwin Klaassen; Jonathan Sorger; Deepa A Rao; Darcy A Kerr; Eric R Henderson; Adam W G Alani; Summer L Gibbs
Journal:  Adv Ther (Weinh)       Date:  2021-05-13
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.