| Literature DB >> 34002555 |
Feredun Azari1, Gregory Kennedy1, Elizabeth Bernstein1, Constantinos Hadjipanayis2, Alexander Vahrmeijer3, Barbara Smith4, Eben Rosenthal5, Baran Sumer6, Jie Tian7, Eric Henderson8, Amy Lee9, Quyen Nguyen10, Summer Gibbs11, Brian Pogue12,13, Daniel Orringer14, Cleopatra Charalampaki15, Linda Martin16, Janos Tanyi1, Major Lee1, John Y Lee1, Sunil Singhal1.
Abstract
SIGNIFICANCE: Surgery is often paramount in the management of many solid organ malignancies because optimal resection is a major factor in disease-specific survival. Cancer surgery has multiple challenges including localizing small lesions, ensuring negative surgical margins around a tumor, adequately staging patients by discriminating positive lymph nodes, and identifying potential synchronous cancers. Intraoperative molecular imaging (IMI) is an emerging potential tool proposed to address these issues. IMI is the process of injecting patients with fluorescent-targeted contrast agents that highlight cancer cells prior to surgery. Over the last 5 to 7 years, enormous progress has been achieved in tracer development, near-infrared camera approvals, and clinical trials. Therefore, a second biennial conference was organized at the University of Pennsylvania to gather surgical oncologists, scientists, and experts to discuss new investigative findings in the field. Our review summarizes the discussions from the conference and highlights findings in various clinical and scientific trials. AIM: Recent advances in IMI were presented, and the importance of each clinical trial for surgical oncology was critically assessed. A major focus was to elaborate on the clinical endpoints that were being utilized in IMI trials to advance the respective surgical subspecialties. APPROACH: Principal investigators presenting at the Perelman School of Medicine Abramson Cancer Center's second clinical trials update on IMI were selected to discuss their clinical trials and endpoints.Entities:
Keywords: fluorescence-guided surgery; intraoperative molecular imaging; intraoperative visualization; molecular imaging; optical biopsy; tumor surgery
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34002555 PMCID: PMC8126806 DOI: 10.1117/1.JBO.26.5.050901
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Biomed Opt ISSN: 1083-3668 Impact factor: 3.170
Summary of tracer trials currently in phase 3 and beyond.
| Presenter | Tracer | Tumor type |
|---|---|---|
| Costas Hadjipanayis, MD, PhD | 5-ALA (Gleolan) | Various neurosurgical applications |
| Janos L. Tanyi, MD, PhD | FRa | Ovarian cancer |
| Sunil Singhal, MD | FRa | Lung cancer |
| Alexander L. Vahrmeijer, MD | CEA (SGM-101) | Colon cancer |
| Barbara L. Smith, MD, PhD | Protease-activated dye | Breast cancer |
Fig. 1OTL38 use in lung adenocarcinoma not only aids in identifying primary lesions but also has shown utility in detecting positive surgical margins on resected specimens and detecting synchronous lesions that were missed on preoperative evaluation.
Summary of tracer trials currently in phase 2 and beyond.
| Presenter | Tracer | Tumor type |
|---|---|---|
| Eben Rosenthal, MD | Anti-EGFR antibody | Head and neck malignancies |
| Linda W. Martin, MD, MPH | TumorGlow | Lung cancer, soft tissue sarcomas |
| Baran Sumer, MD, FACS | pH-sensitive tracers | Prostate cancer |
Advantages of anti-EGFR antibodies in head and neck cancer.
| Advantages of anti-EGFR antibodies in head and neck cancer |
| 1. Have been shown by us to detect very small ( |
| 2. Accumulate rapidly inside the tumor since receptor expression and turnover is higher in tumors than normal tissues (the antibody that binds to EGFR is internalized, and then the receptor recycles to the surface). |
| 3. Are simple to manufacture, highly specific for cancer, and shown to be safe. |
| 4. Can be labeled and successfully target tumors for optical and nuclear imaging. |
Summary of phase 1 studies presented at the conference.
| Presenter | Tracer | Specialty |
|---|---|---|
| Jie Tian, PhD | ICG | Hepatopancreaticobiliary |
| John Y.K. Lee MD, MSCE | TumorGlow | Neurosurgery |
| Major Kenneth Lee, IV, MD, PhD | TumorGlow | Hepatopancreaticobiliary |
| Eric R. Henderson, MD | EGFR | Orthopedic oncology |
| Amy Lee, MD | Tumor paint | Pediatric neurosurgery |
| Quyen Nguyen, MD, PhD | Nerve-specific tracers | Head and neck surgery |
| Summer L. Gibbs, PhD | Oxazine | Various applications |
Summary of imaging platform studies presented at the conference.
| Presenter | Imaging platform | Specialty |
|---|---|---|
| Brian W. Pogue, PhD | Various systems | Various applications |
| Daniel A. Orringer, MD | Stimulated Raman histology | Neurosurgery |
| Cleopatra Charalampaki, MD, PhD | Multispectral imaging and confocal imaging | Neurosurgery |
Fig. 2Utilization of IMI for various aspects of oncologic surgery ranging from lesion identification to optical biopsy.
Summary of tracers and their applications discussed during the seminar.
| Tracer | Applications | Clinical challenge |
|---|---|---|
| 5-ALA | Glioma, various neurosurgical applications | Margins |
| OTL38 | Ovarian cancer | Cytoreduction |
| Lung cancer | Synchronous lesions, margins | |
| SGM-101 | Colon cancer | Synchronous lesions, metastatic deposits, margins |
| LUM015 | Breast cancer | Margins |
| Anti-EGFR antibody | Head and neck malignancies, sarcomas | Margins, synchronous lesions, lymph node involvement, metastasis |
| TumorGlow | Lung cancer | Localization |
| Soft tissue sarcomas | Identification of synchronous lesions | |
| Pancreatic cancer | Margins | |
| Brain tumors | Margins | |
| ONM-100 | Prostate cancer | Margins, normal anatomic structure identification |
| ABY-029 | Sarcomas | Margins |
| TumorPaint | Pediatric brain tumors | Margins |
| ALM-488 | Normal nerve identification | Normal anatomic structure identification |
| Oxazine derivatives | Normal nerve identification | Normal anatomic structure identification |