Literature DB >> 29948198

Vastus lateralis muscle tissue composition and motor unit properties in chronically endurance-trained vs. sedentary women.

Hannah L Dimmick1, Jonathan D Miller1, Adam J Sterczala1, Michael A Trevino2, Trent J Herda3.   

Abstract

This study examined motor unit (MU) amplitudes (APAMPS) and firing rates during moderate-intensity contractions and muscle cross-sectional area (mCSA) and echo intensity (mEI) of the vastus lateralis (VL) in chronically endurance-trained and sedentary females. Eight endurance-trained (ET) and nine sedentary controls (SED) volunteered for this study. Surface electromyographic (EMG) signals from a five-pin electrode array were recorded from the VL during isometric trapezoid muscle actions at 40% of maximal voluntary contraction (MVC). Decomposition methods were applied to the EMG signals to extract the firing events and amplitudes of single MUs. The mean firing rate (MFR) during steady force and MUAPAMP for each MU was regressed against recruitment threshold (RT, expressed as %MVC). The y-intercepts and slopes from the MFR and MUAPAMP vs. RT relationships were calculated. EMG amplitude during steady force was normalized (N-EMGRMS) to peak EMG amplitude recorded during the MVC. Ultrasonography was used to measure mCSA and mEI. Significant differences existed between the ET and SED for the slopes (P = 0.005, P = 0.001) from the MFR and MUAPAMP vs. RT relationships with no differences for the y-intercepts (P > 0.05). N-EMGRMS was significantly (P = 0.033) lower for the ET than SED. There were no differences between groups for mCSA; however, the SED possessed significantly (P = 0.001) greater mEI. Subsequently, the ET likely possessed hypertrophied and stronger MUs that allowed for lower necessary muscle activation to maintain the same relative task as the SED. The larger MUs for the ET is supported via the MFR vs. RT relationships and ultrasound data.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Endurance training; Motor unit action potential; Surface electromyography; Ultrasound

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29948198     DOI: 10.1007/s00421-018-3909-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol        ISSN: 1439-6319            Impact factor:   3.078


  51 in total

Review 1.  Individual differences in response to regular physical activity.

Authors:  C Bouchard; T Rankinen
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 5.411

2.  Conduction velocity and amplitude of the action potential as related to circumference in the isolated fibre of frog muscle.

Authors:  C H HAKANSSON
Journal:  Acta Physiol Scand       Date:  1956-07-17

3.  Effects of fatigue on motor unit firing rate versus recruitment threshold relationships.

Authors:  Matt S Stock; Travis W Beck; Jason M Defreitas
Journal:  Muscle Nerve       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 3.217

4.  Estimating motor unit discharge patterns from high-density surface electromyogram.

Authors:  Ales Holobar; Dario Farina; Marco Gazzoni; Roberto Merletti; Damjan Zazula
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-02-08       Impact factor: 3.708

5.  Adjustments differ among low-threshold motor units during intermittent, isometric contractions.

Authors:  Dario Farina; Ales Holobar; Marco Gazzoni; Damjan Zazula; Roberto Merletti; Roger M Enoka
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-11-12       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  The influence of electromyographic recording methods and the innervation zone on the mean power frequency-torque relationships.

Authors:  Trent J Herda; Jorge M Zuniga; Eric D Ryan; Clayton L Camic; Haley C Bergstrom; Doug B Smith; Joseph P Weir; Joel T Cramer; Terry J Housh
Journal:  J Electromyogr Kinesiol       Date:  2015-03-19       Impact factor: 2.368

7.  Surface electromyographic amplitude does not identify differences in neural drive to synergistic muscles.

Authors:  Eduardo Martinez-Valdes; Francesco Negro; Deborah Falla; Alessandro Marco De Nunzio; Dario Farina
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2018-02-08

8.  Influence of proprioceptive feedback on the firing rate and recruitment of motoneurons.

Authors:  C J De Luca; J C Kline
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2011-12-20       Impact factor: 5.379

9.  Recording characteristics of the surface EMG electrodes.

Authors:  P E Barkhaus; S D Nandedkar
Journal:  Muscle Nerve       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 3.217

10.  Behaviour of human motor units in different muscles during linearly varying contractions.

Authors:  C J De Luca; R S LeFever; M P McCue; A P Xenakis
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1982-08       Impact factor: 5.182

View more
  4 in total

1.  Eight weeks of resistance training increases strength, muscle cross-sectional area and motor unit size, but does not alter firing rates in the vastus lateralis.

Authors:  Adam J Sterczala; Jonathan D Miller; Hannah L Dimmick; Mandy E Wray; Michael A Trevino; Trent J Herda
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2019-12-12       Impact factor: 3.078

2.  Effects of continuous cycling training on motor unit firing rates, input excitation, and myosin heavy chain of the vastus lateralis in sedentary females.

Authors:  Michael A Trevino; Hannah L Dimmick; Mandy E Parra; Adam J Sterczala; Jonathan D Miller; Jake A Deckert; Philip M Gallagher; Andrew C Fry; Joseph P Weir; Trent J Herda
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2022-01-20       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  The reliability of the slopes and y-intercepts of the motor unit firing times and action potential waveforms versus recruitment threshold relationships derived from surface electromyography signal decomposition.

Authors:  Mandy E Parra; Jonathan D Miller; Adam J Sterczala; Melani R Kelly; Trent J Herda
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2021-09-03       Impact factor: 3.078

4.  Method of analysis influences interpretations of sex-related differences in firing rates during prolonged submaximal isometric contractions.

Authors:  Hannah L Dimmick; Michael A Trevino; Jonathan D Miller; Mandy E Parra; Adam J Sterczala; Trent J Herda
Journal:  J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact       Date:  2022-03-01       Impact factor: 1.864

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.