Literature DB >> 25851079

The influence of electromyographic recording methods and the innervation zone on the mean power frequency-torque relationships.

Trent J Herda1, Jorge M Zuniga2, Eric D Ryan3, Clayton L Camic4, Haley C Bergstrom5, Doug B Smith6, Joseph P Weir7, Joel T Cramer8, Terry J Housh8.   

Abstract

This study examined the effects of electromyographic (EMG) recording methods and innervation zone (IZ) on the mean power frequency (MPF)-torque relationships. Nine subjects performed isometric ramp muscle actions of the leg extensors from 5% to 100% of maximal voluntary contraction with an eight channel linear electrode array over the IZ of the vastus lateralis. The slopes were calculated from the log-transformed monopolar and bipolar EMG MPF-torque relationships for each channel and subject and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were constructed around the slopes for each relationship and the composite of the slopes. Twenty-two to 55% of the subjects exhibited 95% CIs that did not include a slope of zero for the monopolar EMG MPF-torque relationships while 25-75% of the subjects exhibited 95% CIs that did not include a slope of zero for the bipolar EMG MPF-torque relationships. The composite of the slopes from the EMG MPF-torque relationships were not significantly different from zero for any method or channel, however, the method and IZ location slightly influenced the number of significant slopes on a subject-by-subject basis. The log-transform model indicated that EMG MPF-torque patterns were nonlinear regardless of recording method or distance from the IZ.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Bipolar; EMG; Linear array; MPF; Monopolar

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25851079     DOI: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2015.02.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Electromyogr Kinesiol        ISSN: 1050-6411            Impact factor:   2.368


  2 in total

1.  Vastus lateralis muscle tissue composition and motor unit properties in chronically endurance-trained vs. sedentary women.

Authors:  Hannah L Dimmick; Jonathan D Miller; Adam J Sterczala; Michael A Trevino; Trent J Herda
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2018-06-11       Impact factor: 3.078

2.  Low-load blood flow restriction elicits greater concentric strength than non-blood flow restriction resistance training but similar isometric strength and muscle size.

Authors:  Ethan C Hill; Terry J Housh; Joshua L Keller; Cory M Smith; John V Anders; Richard J Schmidt; Glen O Johnson; Joel T Cramer
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2019-12-17       Impact factor: 3.078

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.