Literature DB >> 29947968

Assessing the Effects of Fire Disturbances and Timber Management on Carbon Storage in the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem.

Feng Zhao1, Sean P Healey2, Chengquan Huang3, James B McCarter4, Chris Garrard5, Sara A Goeking2, Zhiliang Zhu6.   

Abstract

Accurate characterization of Carbon (C) consequences of forest disturbances and management is critical for informed climate mitigation and adaptation strategies. While research into generalized properties of the forest C cycle informs policy and provides abstract guidance to managers, most management occurs at local scales and relies upon monitoring systems that can consistently provide C cycle assessments that explicitly apply to a defined time and place. We used an inventory-based forest monitoring and simulation tool to quantify C storage effects of actual fires, timber harvests, and forest regeneration conditions in the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem (GYE). Results show that (1) the 1988 fires had a larger impact on GYE's C storage than harvesting during 1985-2011; (2) continuation of relatively high harvest rates of the region's National Forest land, which declined after 1990, would have shifted the disturbance agent primary importance on those lands from fire to harvest; and (3) accounting for local heterogeneity of post-disturbance regeneration patterns translates into large regional effects on total C storage. Large fires in 1988 released about 8.3 ± 0.3 Mg/ha of C across Yellowstone National Park (YNP, including both disturbed and undisturbed area), compared with total C storage reductions due to harvest of about 2.3 ± 0.3 Mg/ha and 2.6 ± 0.2 Mg/ha in adjacent Caribou-Targhee and Gallatin National Forests, respectively, from 1985-2011. If the high harvest rates observed in 1985-1989 had been maintained through 2011 in GYE National Forests, the C storage effect of harvesting would have quintupled to 10.5 ± 1.0 Mg/ha, exceeding the immediate losses associated with YNP's historic fire but not the longer-term net loss of carbon (16.9 ± 0.8 Mg/ha). Following stand-replacing disturbance such as the 1988 fires, the actual regeneration rate was slower than the default regional average rate assumed by empirically calibrated forest growth models. If regeneration following the 1988 fire had reached regionally average rates, either through different natural circumstances or through more active management, YNP would have had approximately 4.1 Mg/ha more forest carbon by year 2020. This study highlights the relative effects of fire disturbances and management activities on regional C storage, and demonstrates a forest carbon monitoring system that can be both applied consistently across the US and tailored to questions of specific local management interest.

Entities:  

Keywords:  1988 Yellowstone fires; Carbon monitoring; Forest management; Heterogeneous forest regeneration; Post-Disturbance carbon accumulation

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29947968     DOI: 10.1007/s00267-018-1073-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Manage        ISSN: 0364-152X            Impact factor:   3.266


  11 in total

1.  Projecting the future of the U.S. carbon sink.

Authors:  G C Hurtt; S W Pacala; P R Moorcroft; J Caspersen; E Shevliakova; R A Houghton; B Moore
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-02-05       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  The global distribution of ecosystems in a world without fire.

Authors:  W J Bond; F I Woodward; G F Midgley
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 10.151

3.  Climate change and forests of the future: managing in the face of uncertainty.

Authors:  Constance I Millar; Nathan L Stephenson; Scott L Stephens
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 4.657

4.  Reburn severity in managed and unmanaged vegetation in a large wildfire.

Authors:  Jonathan R Thompson; Thomas A Spies; Lisa M Ganio
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-06-11       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  A large and persistent carbon sink in the world's forests.

Authors:  Yude Pan; Richard A Birdsey; Jingyun Fang; Richard Houghton; Pekka E Kauppi; Werner A Kurz; Oliver L Phillips; Anatoly Shvidenko; Simon L Lewis; Josep G Canadell; Philippe Ciais; Robert B Jackson; Stephen W Pacala; A David McGuire; Shilong Piao; Aapo Rautiainen; Stephen Sitch; Daniel Hayes
Journal:  Science       Date:  2011-07-14       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Contributions of land-use history to carbon accumulation in U.S. forests.

Authors:  J P Caspersen; S W Pacala; J C Jenkins; G C Hurtt; P R Moorcroft; R A Birdsey
Journal:  Science       Date:  2000-11-10       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Projected carbon stocks in the conterminous USA with land use and variable fire regimes.

Authors:  Dominique Bachelet; Ken Ferschweiler; Timothy J Sheehan; Benjamin M Sleeter; Zhiliang Zhu
Journal:  Glob Chang Biol       Date:  2015-10-23       Impact factor: 10.863

8.  Twenty-four years after theYellowstone Fires: Are postfire lodgepole pine stands converging in structure and function?

Authors:  Monica G Turner; Timothy G Whitby; Daniel B Tinker; William H Romme
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 5.499

9.  Estimates of carbon stored in harvested wood products from the United States forest service northern region, 1906-2010.

Authors:  Keith D Stockmann; Nathaniel M Anderson; Kenneth E Skog; Sean P Healey; Dan R Loeffler; Greg Jones; James F Morrison
Journal:  Carbon Balance Manag       Date:  2012-01-13

10.  Effects of harvest, fire, and pest/pathogen disturbances on the West Cascades ecoregion carbon balance.

Authors:  David P Turner; William D Ritts; Robert E Kennedy; Andrew N Gray; Zhiqiang Yang
Journal:  Carbon Balance Manag       Date:  2015-05-20
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.