Literature DB >> 26207729

Projected carbon stocks in the conterminous USA with land use and variable fire regimes.

Dominique Bachelet1, Ken Ferschweiler1, Timothy J Sheehan1, Benjamin M Sleeter2, Zhiliang Zhu3.   

Abstract

The dynamic global vegetation model (DGVM) MC2 was run over the conterminous USA at 30 arc sec (~800 m) to simulate the impacts of nine climate futures generated by 3GCMs (CSIRO, MIROC and CGCM3) using 3 emission scenarios (A2, A1B and B1) in the context of the LandCarbon national carbon sequestration assessment. It first simulated potential vegetation dynamics from coast to coast assuming no human impacts and naturally occurring wildfires. A moderate effect of increased atmospheric CO2 on water use efficiency and growth enhanced carbon sequestration but did not greatly influence woody encroachment. The wildfires maintained prairie-forest ecotones in the Great Plains. With simulated fire suppression, the number and impacts of wildfires was reduced as only catastrophic fires were allowed to escape. This greatly increased the expansion of forests and woodlands across the western USA and some of the ecotones disappeared. However, when fires did occur, their impacts (both extent and biomass consumed) were very large. We also evaluated the relative influence of human land use including forest and crop harvest by running the DGVM with land use (and fire suppression) and simple land management rules. From 2041 through 2060, carbon stocks (live biomass, soil and dead biomass) of US terrestrial ecosystems varied between 155 and 162 Pg C across the three emission scenarios when potential natural vegetation was simulated. With land use, periodic harvest of croplands and timberlands as well as the prevention of woody expansion across the West reduced carbon stocks to a range of 122-126 Pg C, while effective fire suppression reduced fire emissions by about 50%. Despite the simplicity of our approach, the differences between the size of the carbon stocks confirm other reports of the importance of land use on the carbon cycle over climate change.
© 2015 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CMIP3; DGVM; SRES; USA; carbon; fire; land use; simulation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26207729     DOI: 10.1111/gcb.13048

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Glob Chang Biol        ISSN: 1354-1013            Impact factor:   10.863


  9 in total

1.  A human-driven decline in global burned area.

Authors:  N Andela; D C Morton; L Giglio; Y Chen; G R van der Werf; P S Kasibhatla; R S DeFries; G J Collatz; S Hantson; S Kloster; D Bachelet; M Forrest; G Lasslop; F Li; S Mangeon; J R Melton; C Yue; J T Randerson
Journal:  Science       Date:  2017-06-30       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Assessing the Effects of Fire Disturbances and Timber Management on Carbon Storage in the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem.

Authors:  Feng Zhao; Sean P Healey; Chengquan Huang; James B McCarter; Chris Garrard; Sara A Goeking; Zhiliang Zhu
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2018-06-15       Impact factor: 3.266

Review 3.  Global change and terrestrial plant community dynamics.

Authors:  Janet Franklin; Josep M Serra-Diaz; Alexandra D Syphard; Helen M Regan
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-02-29       Impact factor: 12.779

4.  Projecting Age-Stratified Risk of Exposure to Inland Flooding and Wildfire Smoke in the United States under Two Climate Scenarios.

Authors:  David Mills; Russell Jones; Cameron Wobus; Julia Ekstrom; Lesley Jantarasami; Alexis St Juliana; Allison Crimmins
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2018-04-17       Impact factor: 9.031

5.  A fuzzy logic decision support model for climate-driven biomass loss risk in western Oregon and Washington.

Authors:  T Sheehan; D Bachelet
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-10-25       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Tree-ring widths are good proxies of annual variation in forest productivity in temperate forests.

Authors:  Kai Xu; Xiangping Wang; Penghong Liang; Hailong An; Han Sun; Wei Han; Qiaoyan Li
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-05-16       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Mapping future fire probability under climate change: Does vegetation matter?

Authors:  Alexandra D Syphard; Timothy Sheehan; Heather Rustigian-Romsos; Kenneth Ferschweiler
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-08-06       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Fire, CO2, and climate effects on modeled vegetation and carbon dynamics in western Oregon and Washington.

Authors:  Tim Sheehan; Dominique Bachelet; Ken Ferschweiler
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-01-25       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Operational assessment tool for forest carbon dynamics for the United States: a new spatially explicit approach linking the LUCAS and CBM-CFS3 models.

Authors:  Benjamin M Sleeter; Leonardo Frid; Bronwyn Rayfield; Colin Daniel; Zhiliang Zhu; David C Marvin
Journal:  Carbon Balance Manag       Date:  2022-02-02
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.