Literature DB >> 11830663

Projecting the future of the U.S. carbon sink.

G C Hurtt1, S W Pacala, P R Moorcroft, J Caspersen, E Shevliakova, R A Houghton, B Moore.   

Abstract

Atmospheric and ground-based methods agree on the presence of a carbon sink in the coterminous United States (the United States minus Alaska and Hawaii), and the primary causes for the sink recently have been identified. Projecting the future behavior of the sink is necessary for projecting future net emissions. Here we use two models, the Ecosystem Demography model and a second simpler empirically based model (Miami Land Use History), to estimate the spatio-temporal patterns of ecosystem carbon stocks and fluxes resulting from land-use changes and fire suppression from 1700 to 2100. Our results are compared with other historical reconstructions of ecosystem carbon fluxes and to a detailed carbon budget for the 1980s. Our projections indicate that the ecosystem recovery processes that are primarily responsible for the contemporary U.S. carbon sink will slow over the next century, resulting in a significant reduction of the sink. The projected rate of decrease depends strongly on scenarios of future land use and the long-term effectiveness of fire suppression.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11830663      PMCID: PMC122200          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.012249999

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  6 in total

Review 1.  The global carbon cycle: a test of our knowledge of earth as a system.

Authors:  P Falkowski; R J Scholes; E Boyle; J Canadell; D Canfield; J Elser; N Gruber; K Hibbard; P Högberg; S Linder; F T Mackenzie; B Moore; T Pedersen; Y Rosenthal; S Seitzinger; V Smetacek; W Steffen
Journal:  Science       Date:  2000-10-13       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Consistent land- and atmosphere-based U.S. carbon sink estimates.

Authors:  S W Pacala; G C Hurtt; D Baker; P Peylin; R A Houghton; R A Birdsey; L Heath; E T Sundquist; R F Stallard; P Ciais; P Moorcroft; J P Caspersen; E Shevliakova; B Moore; G Kohlmaier; E Holland; M Gloor; M E Harmon; S M Fan; J L Sarmiento; C L Goodale; D Schimel; C B Field
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-06-22       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Soil fertility limits carbon sequestration by forest ecosystems in a CO2-enriched atmosphere.

Authors:  R Oren; D S Ellsworth; K H Johnsen; N Phillips; B E Ewers; C Maier; K V Schäfer; H McCarthy; G Hendrey; S G McNulty; G G Katul
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-05-24       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Contribution of increasing CO2 and climate to carbon storage by ecosystems in the United States.

Authors:  D Schimel; J Melillo; H Tian; A D McGuire; D Kicklighter; T Kittel; N Rosenbloom; S Running; P Thornton; D Ojima; W Parton; R Kelly; M Sykes; R Neilson; B Rizzo
Journal:  Science       Date:  2000-03-17       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Contributions of land-use history to carbon accumulation in U.S. forests.

Authors:  J P Caspersen; S W Pacala; J C Jenkins; G C Hurtt; P R Moorcroft; R A Birdsey
Journal:  Science       Date:  2000-11-10       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  The U.S. Carbon budget: contributions from land-Use change

Authors: 
Journal:  Science       Date:  1999-07-23       Impact factor: 47.728

  6 in total
  19 in total

Review 1.  Recent advances in ecosystem-atmosphere interactions: an ecological perspective.

Authors:  P R Moorcroft
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2003-06-22       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Soil warming, carbon-nitrogen interactions, and forest carbon budgets.

Authors:  Jerry M Melillo; Sarah Butler; Jennifer Johnson; Jacqueline Mohan; Paul Steudler; Heidi Lux; Elizabeth Burrows; Francis Bowles; Rose Smith; Lindsay Scott; Chelsea Vario; Troy Hill; Andrew Burton; Yu-Mei Zhou; Jim Tang
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-05-23       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Assessing the Effects of Fire Disturbances and Timber Management on Carbon Storage in the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem.

Authors:  Feng Zhao; Sean P Healey; Chengquan Huang; James B McCarter; Chris Garrard; Sara A Goeking; Zhiliang Zhu
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2018-06-15       Impact factor: 3.266

4.  Carbon emissions from tropical deforestation and regrowth based on satellite observations for the 1980s and 1990s.

Authors:  Ruth S DeFries; Richard A Houghton; Matthew C Hansen; Christopher B Field; David Skole; John Townshend
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-10-16       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Regional US carbon sinks from three-dimensional atmospheric CO2 sampling.

Authors:  Cyril Crevoisier; Colm Sweeney; Manuel Gloor; Jorge L Sarmiento; Pieter P Tans
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-10-11       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Climate Drives Modeled Forest Carbon Cycling Resistance and Resilience in the Upper Great Lakes Region, USA.

Authors:  Kalyn Dorheim; Christopher M Gough; Lisa T Haber; Kayla C Mathes; Alexey N Shiklomanov; Ben Bond-Lamberty
Journal:  J Geophys Res Biogeosci       Date:  2022-01-13       Impact factor: 4.432

7.  Historical forest baselines reveal potential for continued carbon sequestration.

Authors:  Jeanine M Rhemtulla; David J Mladenoff; Murray K Clayton
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-04-06       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  An atmospheric perspective on North American carbon dioxide exchange: CarbonTracker.

Authors:  Wouter Peters; Andrew R Jacobson; Colm Sweeney; Arlyn E Andrews; Thomas J Conway; Kenneth Masarie; John B Miller; Lori M P Bruhwiler; Gabrielle Pétron; Adam I Hirsch; Douglas E J Worthy; Guido R van der Werf; James T Randerson; Paul O Wennberg; Maarten C Krol; Pieter P Tans
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-11-27       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Variation in tree mortality and regeneration affect forest carbon recovery following fuel treatments and wildfire in the Lake Tahoe Basin, California, USA.

Authors:  Chris H Carlson; Solomon Z Dobrowski; Hugh D Safford
Journal:  Carbon Balance Manag       Date:  2012-06-28

10.  Accounting for risk in valuing forest carbon offsets.

Authors:  Matthew D Hurteau; Bruce A Hungate; George W Koch
Journal:  Carbon Balance Manag       Date:  2009-01-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.