Literature DB >> 25633505

Multiphase CT Angiography: A New Tool for the Imaging Triage of Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke.

Bijoy K Menon1, Christopher D d'Esterre, Emmad M Qazi, Mohammed Almekhlafi, Leszek Hahn, Andrew M Demchuk, Mayank Goyal.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To describe the use of an imaging selection tool, multiphase computed tomographic (CT) angiography, in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) and to demonstrate its interrater reliability and ability to help determine clinical outcome.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The local ethics board approved this study. Data are from the pilot phase of PRoveIT, a prospective observational study analyzing utility of multimodal imaging in the triage of patients with AIS. Patients underwent baseline unenhanced CT, single-phase CT angiography of the head and neck, multiphase CT angiography, and perfusion CT. Multiphase CT angiography generates time-resolved images of pial arteries. Pial arterial filling was scored on a six-point ordinal scale, and interrater reliability was tested. Clinical outcomes included a 50% or greater decrease in National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) over 24 hours and 90-day modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score of 0-2. The ability to predict clinical outcomes was compared between single-phase CT angiography, multiphase CT angiography, and perfusion CT by using receiver operating curve analysis, Akaike information criterion (AIC), and Bayesian information criterion (BIC).
RESULTS: A total of 147 patients were included. Interrater reliability for multiphase CT angiography is excellent (n = 30, κ = 0.81, P < .001). At receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, the ability to predict clinical outcome is modest (C statistic = 0.56, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.52, 0.63 for ≥50% decrease in NIHSS over 24 hours; C statistic = 0.6, 95% CI: 0.53, 0.68 for 90-day mRS score of 0-2) but better than that of models using single-phase CT angiography and perfusion CT (P < .05 overall). With AIC and BIC, models that use multiphase CT angiography are better than models that use single-phase CT angiography and perfusion CT for a decrease of 50% or more in NIHSS over 24 hours (AIC = 166, BIC = 171.7; values were lowest for multiphase CT angiography) and a 90-day mRS score of 0-2 (AIC = 132.1, BIC = 137.4; values were lowest for multiphase CT angiography).
CONCLUSION: Multiphase CT angiography is a reliable tool for imaging selection in patients with AIS. (©) RSNA, 2015

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25633505     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.15142256

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  136 in total

1.  Emergent Neurovascular Imaging: A Necessity for the Work-Up of Minor Stroke and TIA.

Authors:  S B Coutts; M Goyal
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2015-09-24       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 2.  Intra-arterial thrombectomy: does invasive treatment lead to better outcomes than intravenous thrombolysis alone?

Authors:  Laurel Cherian; Shawna Cutting; Sarah Song
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 3.  What is new in stroke imaging and intervention?

Authors:  Philip White; Andrew Nanapragasam
Journal:  Clin Med (Lond)       Date:  2018-04-01       Impact factor: 2.659

4.  Radiomics-Based Intracranial Thrombus Features on CT and CTA Predict Recanalization with Intravenous Alteplase in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke.

Authors:  W Qiu; H Kuang; J Nair; Z Assis; M Najm; C McDougall; B McDougall; K Chung; A T Wilson; M Goyal; M D Hill; A M Demchuk; B K Menon
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2018-12-20       Impact factor: 3.825

5.  Added value of CT perfusion compared to CT angiography in predicting clinical outcomes of stroke patients treated with mechanical thrombectomy.

Authors:  Ioannis Tsogkas; Michael Knauth; Katharina Schregel; Daniel Behme; Katrin Wasser; Ilko Maier; Jan Liman; Marios Nikos Psychogios
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-02-23       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Collateral status and tissue outcome after intra-arterial therapy for patients with acute ischemic stroke.

Authors:  Anna Mm Boers; Ivo Gh Jansen; Olvert A Berkhemer; Albert J Yoo; Hester F Lingsma; Cornelis H Slump; Yvo Bwem Roos; Robert J van Oostenbrugge; Diederik Wj Dippel; Aad van der Lugt; Wim H van Zwam; Henk A Marquering; Charles Blm Majoie
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2016-11-19       Impact factor: 6.200

7.  Multisociety Consensus Quality Improvement Revised Consensus Statement for Endovascular Therapy of Acute Ischemic Stroke.

Authors:  D Sacks; B Baxter; B C V Campbell; J S Carpenter; C Cognard; D Dippel; M Eesa; U Fischer; K Hausegger; J A Hirsch; M S Hussain; O Jansen; M V Jayaraman; A A Khalessi; B W Kluck; S Lavine; P M Meyers; S Ramee; D A Rüfenacht; C M Schirmer; D Vorwerk
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2018-05-17       Impact factor: 3.825

8.  Time-resolved CT assessment of collaterals as imaging biomarkers to predict clinical outcomes in acute ischemic stroke.

Authors:  Elizabeth Tong; Jim Patrie; Sara Tong; Avery Evans; Patrik Michel; Ashraf Eskandari; Max Wintermark
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 2.804

9.  An acute stroke CT imaging algorithm incorporating automated perfusion analysis.

Authors:  Danielle Byrne; John P Walsh; Peter J MacMahon
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2019-02-01

10.  Imaging of Patients with Suspected Large-Vessel Occlusion at Primary Stroke Centers: Available Modalities and a Suggested Approach.

Authors:  M A Almekhlafi; W G Kunz; B K Menon; R A McTaggart; M V Jayaraman; B W Baxter; D Heck; D Frei; C P Derdeyn; T Takagi; A H Aamodt; I M R Fragata; M D Hill; A M Demchuk; M Goyal
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2019-01-31       Impact factor: 3.825

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.