Literature DB >> 31985008

Pollen on stigmas as proxies of pollinator competition and facilitation: complexities, caveats and future directions.

Tia-Lynn Ashman1, Conchita Alonso2, Victor Parra-Tabla3, Gerardo Arceo-Gómez4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Pollen transfer via animals is necessary for reproduction by ~80 % of flowering plants, and most of these plants live in multispecies communities where they can share pollinators. While diffuse plant-pollinator interactions are increasingly recognized as the rule rather than the exception, their fitness consequences cannot be deduced from flower visitation alone, so other proxies, functionally closer to seed production and amenable for use in a broad variety of diverse communities, are necessary. SCOPE: We conceptually summarize how the study of pollen on stigmas of spent flowers can reflect key drivers and functional aspects of the plant-pollinator interaction (e.g. competition, facilitation or commensalism). We critically evaluate how variable visitation rates and other factors (pollinator pool and floral avoidance) can give rise to different relationships between heterospecific pollen and (1) conspecific pollen on the stigma and (2) conspecific tubes/grain in the style, revealing the complexity of potential interpretations. We advise on best practices for using these proxies, noting the assumptions and caveats involved in their use, and explicate what additional data are required to verify interpretation of given patterns.
CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that characterizing pollen on stigmas of spent flowers provides an attainable indirect measure of pollination interactions, but given the complex processes of pollen transfer that generate patterns of conspecific-heterospecific pollen on stigmas these cannot alone determine whether competition or facilitation are the underlying drivers. Thus, functional tests are also needed to validate these hypotheses.
© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Annals of Botany Company. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Conspecific pollen; heterospecific pollen; plant–plant interactions; plant–pollinator network; pollen transfer; pollen tube; pollination; pollinator sharing; stigmatic pollen load; visitation network

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31985008      PMCID: PMC7262468          DOI: 10.1093/aob/mcaa012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Bot        ISSN: 0305-7364            Impact factor:   4.357


  42 in total

1.  Expanding the limits of the pollen-limitation concept: effects of pollen quantity and quality.

Authors:  Marcelo A Aizen; Lawrence D Harder
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 5.499

2.  The adaptive accuracy of flowers: measurement and microevolutionary patterns.

Authors:  W Scott Armbruster; Thomas F Hansen; Christophe Pélabon; Rocío Pérez-Barrales; Johanne Maad
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2009-05-08       Impact factor: 4.357

3.  Linking pollinator efficiency to patterns of pollen limitation: small bees exploit the plant-pollinator mutualism.

Authors:  Matthew H Koski; Jennifer L Ison; Ashley Padilla; Angela Q Pham; Laura F Galloway
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-06-13       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Competition for pollination influences selection on floral traits of Ipomopsis aggregata.

Authors:  C M Caruso
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 3.694

5.  Evaluating the effects of pollinator-mediated interactions using pollen transfer networks: evidence of widespread facilitation in south Andean plant communities.

Authors:  C Tur; A Sáez; A Traveset; M A Aizen
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2016-03-14       Impact factor: 9.492

6.  Floral pigmentation patterns provide an example of Gloger's rule in plants.

Authors:  Matthew H Koski; Tia-Lynn Ashman
Journal:  Nat Plants       Date:  2015-01-08       Impact factor: 15.793

7.  Patterns and effects of heterospecific pollen transfer between an invasive and two native plant species: the importance of pollen arrival time to the stigma.

Authors:  Alexander Suárez-Mariño; Gerardo Arceo-Gómez; Paula Sosenski; Víctor Parra-Tabla
Journal:  Am J Bot       Date:  2019-09-25       Impact factor: 3.844

8.  Aperture number influences pollen survival in Arabidopsis mutants.

Authors:  Charlotte Prieu; Alexis Matamoro-Vidal; Christian Raquin; Anna Dobritsa; Raphaël Mercier; Pierre-Henri Gouyon; Béatrice Albert
Journal:  Am J Bot       Date:  2016-03-09       Impact factor: 3.844

9.  Pollen grain morphology is not exclusively responsible for pollen collectability in bumble bees.

Authors:  Sabine Konzmann; Sebastian Koethe; Klaus Lunau
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-03-18       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  A review of European studies on pollination networks and pollen limitation, and a case study designed to fill in a gap.

Authors:  Joanne M Bennett; Amibeth Thompson; Irina Goia; Reinart Feldmann; Valentin Ştefan; Ana Bogdan; Demetra Rakosy; Mirela Beloiu; Inge-Beatrice Biro; Simon Bluemel; Milena Filip; Anna-Maria Madaj; Alina Martin; Sarah Passonneau; Denisa P Kalisch; Gwydion Scherer; Tiffany M Knight
Journal:  AoB Plants       Date:  2018-10-31       Impact factor: 3.276

View more
  10 in total

1.  Diversity and composition of pollen loads carried by pollinators are primarily driven by insect traits, not floral community characteristics.

Authors:  Nevin Cullen; Jing Xia; Na Wei; Rainee Kaczorowski; Gerardo Arceo-Gómez; Elizabeth O'Neill; Rebecca Hayes; Tia-Lynn Ashman
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2021-04-11       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Pollinators contribute to the maintenance of flowering plant diversity.

Authors:  Na Wei; Rainee L Kaczorowski; Gerardo Arceo-Gómez; Elizabeth M O'Neill; Rebecca A Hayes; Tia-Lynn Ashman
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2021-09-08       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Causes and consequences of variation in heterospecific pollen receipt in Oenothera fruticosa.

Authors:  Gerard X Smith; Mark T Swartz; Rachel B Spigler
Journal:  Am J Bot       Date:  2021-08-30       Impact factor: 3.325

4.  Feeding friend and foe: ample pollen mitigates the effects of pollen theft for a gynodioecious plant, Polemonium foliosissimum (Polemoniaceae).

Authors:  Alison K Brody; P Alexander Burnham; Brittany Smith
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2021-07-28       Impact factor: 4.357

5.  Hummingbird contribution to plant reproduction in the rupestrian grasslands is not defined by pollination syndrome.

Authors:  Marsal D Amorim; Pietro K Maruyama; Gudryan J Baronio; Cristiano S Azevedo; André R Rech
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2022-01-18       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Using RNA-seq to characterize pollen-stigma interactions for pollination studies.

Authors:  Juan Lobaton; Rose Andrew; Jorge Duitama; Lindsey Kirkland; Sarina Macfadyen; Romina Rader
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-03-23       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Coflowering invasive plants and a congener have neutral effects on fitness components of a rare endemic plant.

Authors:  Diane L Larson; Jennifer L Larson; Amy J Symstad; Deborah A Buhl; Zachary M Portman
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2021-03-20       Impact factor: 2.912

8.  Pollination success increases with plant diversity in high-Andean communities.

Authors:  Sabrina S Gavini; Agustín Sáez; Cristina Tur; Marcelo A Aizen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-11-11       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Florivory and Pollination Intersection: Changes in Floral Trait Expression Do Not Discourage Hummingbird Pollination.

Authors:  Priscila Tunes; Stefan Dötterl; Elza Guimarães
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2022-03-30       Impact factor: 5.753

Review 10.  Evolutionary Genomics of Plant Gametophytic Selection.

Authors:  Felix E G Beaudry; Joanna L Rifkin; Spencer C H Barrett; Stephen I Wright
Journal:  Plant Commun       Date:  2020-10-24
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.