| Literature DB >> 29946530 |
Leonardo Vinícius Monteiro de Assis1, Gabriela Sarti Kinker2, Maria Nathália Moraes1, Regina P Markus2, Pedro Augusto Fernandes2, Ana Maria de Lauro Castrucci1,3.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Melanoma is the most lethal type of skin cancer, with increasing incidence and mortality rates worldwide. Multiple studies have demonstrated a link between cancer development/progression and circadian disruption; however, the complex role of tumor-autonomous molecular clocks remains poorly understood. With that in mind, we investigated the pathophysiological relevance of clock genes expression in metastatic melanoma.Entities:
Keywords: ARNTL/BMAL1 immunotherapy; circadian rhythms; clock genes; melanoma; skin cancer
Year: 2018 PMID: 29946530 PMCID: PMC6005821 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2018.00185
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Oncol ISSN: 2234-943X Impact factor: 6.244
Figure 1Clinical relevance of clock genes expression in metastatic melanomas. (A) RNAseq analysis of clock genes expression in genotype-tissue expression (GTEx) normal skins (n = 234) and The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) metastatic melanoma (n = 340). Expression values were estimated using RSEM and log2(x + 1) transformed. The boxes extend from the 25th to the 75th percentile, the central bold line shows the median, and whiskers are drawn from minimum to maximum values. Comparisons were performed using the two-sided Wilcoxon–Mann–Whitney test. *Significantly different from normal skin (P < 0.05). (B) Co-expression matrix showing pairwise Spearman’s correlation coefficients of clock core genes in GTEx normal skins (n = 234) and TCGA metastatic melanomas (n = 340). Networks were compared using the CoGA software. (C) Univariate Cox analysis of overall survival according to the expression of clock core genes in TCGA metastatic melanomas. Hazard Ratios including 95% confidence intervals are shown. Genes with a significant prognostic value (P < 0.05) are marked in black. (D) Kaplan–Meier survival curve according to the expression of aryl hydrocarbon receptor nuclear translocator-like protein 1 (BMAL1) in TCGA metastatic melanomas. The median expression of BMAL1 was used as the cutoff to dichotomize the population. Comparisons were performed using the log-rank test.
Clinicopathological features according to the expression of clock genes in The Cancer Genome Atlas metastatic melanomas.
| Variables | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age | 0.59 | 0.592 | 0.998 | 0.151 | 0.057 | 0.19 | 0.754 | 0.286 | |
| Gender | 0.659 | 0.271 | 0.269 | 0.269 | 0.06 | 0.269 | |||
| Pathologic stage | 0.817 | 0.643 | 0.644 | 0.083 | 0.247 | 0.418 | 0.132 | 0.417 | |
| Ulceration status | 1 | 0.404 | 0.094 | 0.889 | 1 | 0.78 | 0.267 | 0.889 | 1 |
| Mitotic count | 0.769 | 0.175 | 0.07 | 0.801 | 0.465 | 0.256 | 0.276 | 0.613 | 0.963 |
| Breslow thickness | 0.731 | 0.545 | 0.65 | 0.847 | 0.179 | 0.816 | 0.823 | 0.961 | 0.838 |
P-values in bold are statistically significant.
*Two-sided Wilcoxon–Mann–Whitney (continuous variables) or Chi-square exact test (categorical variable) comparing tumors with high vs. low expression.
Multivariate Cox regression analysis of survival in The Cancer Genome Atlas metastatic melanomas.
| Overall survival | ||
|---|---|---|
| Variables | HR (95%CI) | |
| Age | 1.024 (1.007–1.041) | |
| Male vs. female | 1.158 (0.655–2.051) | 0.612 |
| lll-IV vs. I–II | 2.405 (1.427–4.053) | |
| Present vs. absent | 0.994 (0.556–1.769) | 0.985 |
| Mitotic count | 1.015 (0.986–1.045) | 0.301 |
| Breslow thickness | 1.080 (1.004–1.161) | |
| 0.525 (0.369–0.746) | ||
P-values in bold are statistically significant.
HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval.
Figure 2Aryl hydrocarbon receptor nuclear translocator-like protein 1 (BMAL1) expression positively correlates with antitumor immunity in metastatic melanomas. (A) Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA) using genes ranked according to the Spearman’s correlation coefficient between their expression and the expression of BMAL1 in The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) metastatic melanomas (n = 340). Normalized enrichment scores (NES) and P-values corrected by false discovery rate (FDR) were calculated using GSEA v3.0 and Reactome pathways. Only significantly enriched pathways (adjusted P < 0.05) are shown. (B) Spearman’s correlation coefficient between the expression of BMAL1 and immune cells markers in TCGA metastatic melanomas. P-values were corrected by FDR. (C) Association between BMAL1 expression (pretreatment biopsies) and clinical benefit of melanoma patients from anti-PD1 immunotherapy (nivolumab). RNAseq data and treatment response information were obtained from Ref. (42). Comparisons were performed using the Chi-square test. CR, complete response; PR, partial response; SD, stable disease; PD, progressive disease.
Multivariate Cox regression analysis of overall survival in metastatic melanomas adjusted for the percentage of immune cell infiltration in The Cancer Genome Atlas metastatic melanomas.
| Overall survival | ||
|---|---|---|
| Variables | HR (95% CI) | |
| % Lymphocyte infiltration | 0.975 (0.932–1.019) | 0.261 |
| % Monocyte infiltration | 1.001 (0.902–1.111) | 0.974 |
| % Neutrophil infiltration | 0.956 (0.673–1.357) | 0.901 |
| 0.685 (0.550–0.854) | ||
P-values in bold are statistically significant.
HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval.
Figure 3Aryl hydrocarbon receptor nuclear translocator-like protein 1 (BMAL1) expression positively correlates with the mutational and neoantigen load in metastatic melanomas. (A) Spearman’s correlation between the expression of BMAL1 and the number of total mutations and predicted neoantigens in The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) metastatic melanomas (n = 68). NetMHCpan-predicted neoantigens were obtained from Ref. (40). Gene expression of (B) DNA-repair programs and (C) selected base excision repair enzymes according to the expression of BMAL1 in TCGA metastatic melanomas (n = 340). Pathway scores were calculated using single sample Gene Set Enrichment Analysis available in the GSVA R package. The median expression of BMAL1 was used as the cutoff to dichotomize the population. The boxes extend from the 25th to the 75th percentile, the central bold line shows the median, and whiskers are drawn from minimum to maximum values. Comparisons were performed using the two-sided Wilcoxon–Mann–Whitney test. *Significantly different from the low BMAL1 group.