Literature DB >> 29945889

Chromosomal analysis in IVF: just how useful is it?

Darren K Griffin1, Cagri Ogur2,3.   

Abstract

Designed to minimize chances of genetically abnormal embryos, preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) involves in vitro fertilization (IVF), embryo biopsy, diagnosis and selective embryo transfer. Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) aims to avoid miscarriage and live born trisomic offspring and to improve IVF success. Diagnostic approaches include fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and more contemporary comprehensive chromosome screening (CCS) including array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH), quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR), next-generation sequencing (NGS) and karyomapping. NGS has an improved dynamic range, and karyomapping can detect chromosomal and monogenic disorders simultaneously. Mosaicism (commonplace in human embryos) can arise by several mechanisms; those arising initially meiotically (but with a subsequent post-zygotic 'trisomy rescue' event) usually lead to adverse outcomes, whereas the extent to which mosaics that are initially chromosomally normal (but then arise purely post-zygotically) can lead to unaffected live births is uncertain. Polar body (PB) biopsy is the least common sampling method, having drawbacks including cost and inability to detect any paternal contribution. Historically, cleavage-stage (blastomere) biopsy has been the most popular; however, higher abnormality levels, mosaicism and potential for embryo damage have led to it being superseded by blastocyst (trophectoderm - TE) biopsy, which provides more cells for analysis. Improved biopsy, diagnosis and freeze-all strategies collectively have the potential to revolutionize PGT-A, and there is increasing evidence of their combined efficacy. Nonetheless, PGT-A continues to attract criticism, prompting questions of when we consider the evidence base sufficient to justify routine PGT-A? Basic biological research is essential to address unanswered questions concerning the chromosome complement of human embryos, and we thus entreat companies, governments and charities to fund more. This will benefit both IVF patients and prospective parents at risk of aneuploid offspring following natural conception. The aim of this review is to appraise the 'state of the art' in terms of PGT-A, including the controversial areas, and to suggest a practical 'way forward' in terms of future diagnosis and applied research.
© 2018 Society for Reproduction and Fertility.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29945889     DOI: 10.1530/REP-17-0683

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Reproduction        ISSN: 1470-1626            Impact factor:   3.906


  18 in total

1.  Mathematical modeling of human oocyte aneuploidy.

Authors:  Katarzyna M Tyc; Rajiv C McCoy; Karen Schindler; Jinchuan Xing
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-04-29       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  RHOA activity in expanding blastocysts is essential to regulate HIPPO-YAP signaling and to maintain the trophectoderm-specific gene expression program in a ROCK/actin filament-independent manner.

Authors:  Yusuke Marikawa; Vernadeth B Alarcon
Journal:  Mol Hum Reprod       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 4.025

Review 3.  The mechanisms and clinical application of mosaicism in preimplantation embryos.

Authors:  Xinyuan Li; Yan Hao; Nagwa Elshewy; Xiaoqian Zhu; Zhiguo Zhang; Ping Zhou
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2019-12-14       Impact factor: 3.412

4.  Male factor infertility impacts the rate of mosaic blastocysts in cycles of preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy.

Authors:  Nicoletta Tarozzi; Marco Nadalini; Cristina Lagalla; Giovanni Coticchio; Carlotta Zacà; Andrea Borini
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2019-10-19       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 5.  Chromosomal Analysis of Pre-implantation Embryos: Its Place in Current IVF Practice.

Authors:  Sadhana K Desai; Vijay S Mangoli
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India       Date:  2020-11-22

6.  RNA-seq as a tool for evaluating human embryo competence.

Authors:  Abigail F Groff; Nina Resetkova; Francesca DiDomenico; Denny Sakkas; Alan Penzias; John L Rinn; Kevin Eggan
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2019-09-23       Impact factor: 9.043

Review 7.  The evolving role of genetic tests in reproductive medicine.

Authors:  Federica Cariati; Valeria D'Argenio; Rossella Tomaiuolo
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2019-08-14       Impact factor: 5.531

Review 8.  Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Chromosomal Abnormalities: Aneuploidy, Mosaicism, and Structural Rearrangements.

Authors:  Manuel Viotti
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2020-05-29       Impact factor: 4.096

9.  Cumulative live-birth, perinatal and obstetric outcomes for POSEIDON groups after IVF/ICSI cycles: a single-center retrospective study.

Authors:  Raed K Abdullah; Nenghui Liu; Yuhao Zhao; Yang Shuang; Zhang Shen; Hong Zeng; Jielei Wu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-07-16       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Novel insights into the genetics of early human development: PGT as a catalyst for reform.

Authors:  David F Albertini
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 3.412

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.