Literature DB >> 30395288

RHOA activity in expanding blastocysts is essential to regulate HIPPO-YAP signaling and to maintain the trophectoderm-specific gene expression program in a ROCK/actin filament-independent manner.

Yusuke Marikawa1, Vernadeth B Alarcon1.   

Abstract

STUDY QUESTION: What molecular signals are required to maintain the functional trophectoderm (TE) during blastocyst expansion of the late stage of preimplantation development? SUMMARY ANSWER: The activity of ras homology family member A (RHOA) GTPases is necessary to retain the expanded blastocyst cavity and also to sustain the gene expression program specific to TE. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: At the early stages of preimplantation development, the precursor of the TE lineage is generated through the molecular signals that integrate RHOA, RHO-associated coiled-coil containing protein kinase (ROCK), the apicobasal cell polarity, and the HIPPO-Yes-associated protein (YAP) signaling pathway. By contrast, molecular mechanisms regulating the maintenance of the TE characteristics at the later stage, which is crucial for blastocyst hatching and implantation, are scarcely understood. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: Expanding mouse blastocysts, obtained from crosses of the F1 (C57BL6 × DBA/2) strain, were exposed to chemical agents that interfere with RHOA, ROCK, or the actin cytoskeleton for up to 8 h, and effects on the blastocyst cavity, HIPPO-YAP signaling, and cell lineage-specific gene expression profiles were examined. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING,
METHODS: Mouse embryos at the embryonic stage E3.5 (expanding blastocysts) and E4.5 (fully expanded blastocysts) were treated with RHOA inhibitor (C3 exoenzyme), ROCK inhibitor (Y27632), or actin filament disruptors (cytochalasin B and latrunculin A). The integrity of the blastocyst cavity was evaluated based on the gross morphology. Effects on HIPPO-YAP signaling were assessed based on the presence of nuclearized YAP protein by immunofluorescence staining and the expression of YAP/TEA domain family member (TEAD) target genes by quantitative RT-PCR (qRT-PCR). The impact of these disruptors on cell lineages was evaluated based on expression of the TE-specific and inner cell mass-specific marker genes by qRT-PCR. The integrity of the apicobasal cell polarity was assessed by localization of protein kinase C zeta (PRKCZ; apical) and scribbled planar cell polarity (SCRIB; basal) proteins by immunofluorescence staining. For comparisons, cultured cell lines, NIH/3T3 (mouse fibroblast) and P19C5 (mouse embryonal carcinoma), were also treated with RHOA inhibitor, ROCK inhibitor, and actin filament disruptors for up to 8 h, and effects on HIPPO-YAP signaling were assessed based on expression of YAP/TEAD target genes by qRT-PCR. Each experiment was repeated using three independent batches of embryos (n = 40-80 per batch) or cell collections. Statistical analyses of data were performed, using one-way ANOVA and two-sample t-test. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Inhibition of RHOA deflated the cavity, diminished nuclear YAP (P < 0.01), and down-regulated the YAP/TEAD target and TE-specific marker genes in both E3.5 and E4.5 blastocysts (P < 0.05), indicating that the maintenance of the key TE characteristics is dependent on RHOA activity. However, inhibition of ROCK or disruption of actin filament only deflated the blastocyst cavity, but did not alter HIPPO-YAP signaling or lineage-specific gene expressions, suggesting that the action of RHOA to sustain the TE-specific gene expression program is not mediated by ROCK or the actomyosin cytoskeleton. By contrast, ROCK inhibitor and actin filament disruptors diminished YAP/TEAD target gene expressions in cultured cells to a greater extent than RHOA inhibitor, implicating that the regulation of HIPPO-YAP signaling in expanding blastocysts is distinctly different from that in the cell lines. Furthermore, the apicobasal cell polarity proteins in the expanding blastocyst were mislocalized by ROCK inhibition but not by RHOA inhibition, indicating that cell polarity is not linked to regulation of HIPPO-YAP signaling. Taken together, our study suggests that RHOA activity is essential to maintain the TE lineage in the expanding blastocyst and it regulates HIPPO-YAP signaling and the lineage-specific gene expression program through mechanisms that are independent of ROCK or actomyosin cytoskeleton. LARGE-SCALE DATA: Not applicable. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: This study was conducted using one species, the mouse. Direct translation of the experiments and findings to human fertility preservation and ART requires further investigations. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE
FINDINGS: The elucidation of the mechanisms of TE formation is highly pertinent to fertility preservation in women. Our findings may raise awareness among providers of ART that the TE is sensitive to disturbance even in the late stage of blastocyst expansion and that rational approaches should be devised to avoid conditions that may impair the TE and its function. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): This study was funded by grants from the Ingeborg v.F. McKee Fund of the Hawaii Community Foundation (16ADVC-78882 to V.B.A.), and the National Institutes of Health (P20 GM103457 and R03 HD088839 to V.B.A.). The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30395288      PMCID: PMC6497036          DOI: 10.1093/molehr/gay048

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Hum Reprod        ISSN: 1360-9947            Impact factor:   4.025


  81 in total

1.  Notch and hippo converge on Cdx2 to specify the trophectoderm lineage in the mouse blastocyst.

Authors:  Teresa Rayon; Sergio Menchero; Andres Nieto; Panagiotis Xenopoulos; Miguel Crespo; Katie Cockburn; Susana Cañon; Hiroshi Sasaki; Anna-Katerina Hadjantonakis; Jose Luis de la Pompa; Janet Rossant; Miguel Manzanares
Journal:  Dev Cell       Date:  2014-08-07       Impact factor: 12.270

Review 2.  Regulating Rho GTPases and their regulators.

Authors:  Richard G Hodge; Anne J Ridley
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2016-06-15       Impact factor: 94.444

3.  Asymmetric distribution of PAR proteins in the mouse embryo begins at the 8-cell stage during compaction.

Authors:  Stéphanie Vinot; Tran Le; Shigeo Ohno; Tony Pawson; Bernard Maro; Sophie Louvet-Vallée
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  2005-06-15       Impact factor: 3.582

4.  Ability of outside cells from preimplantation mouse embryos to form inner cell mass derivatives.

Authors:  J Rossant; K M Vijh
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  1980-05       Impact factor: 3.582

5.  Rho-associated kinase activity is required for proper morphogenesis of the inner cell mass in the mouse blastocyst.

Authors:  Arlene May A Laeno; Dana Ann A Tamashiro; Vernadeth B Alarcon
Journal:  Biol Reprod       Date:  2013-11-21       Impact factor: 4.285

6.  Actin-binding and cell proliferation activities of angiomotin family members are regulated by Hippo pathway-mediated phosphorylation.

Authors:  Siew Wee Chan; Chun Jye Lim; Fusheng Guo; Ivan Tan; Thomas Leung; Wanjin Hong
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2013-11-13       Impact factor: 5.157

7.  Asymmetric division of contractile domains couples cell positioning and fate specification.

Authors:  Hervé Turlier; Rukshala Illukkumbura; Jean-Léon Maître; Björn Eismann; Ritsuya Niwayama; François Nédélec; Takashi Hiiragi
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2016-08-03       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Position- and Hippo signaling-dependent plasticity during lineage segregation in the early mouse embryo.

Authors:  Eszter Posfai; Sophie Petropoulos; Flavia Regina Oliveira de Barros; John Paul Schell; Igor Jurisica; Rickard Sandberg; Fredrik Lanner; Janet Rossant
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2017-02-22       Impact factor: 8.140

9.  Angiomotins link F-actin architecture to Hippo pathway signaling.

Authors:  Sebastian Mana-Capelli; Murugan Paramasivam; Shubham Dutta; Dannel McCollum
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2014-03-19       Impact factor: 4.138

Review 10.  Towards understanding the roles of position and geometry on cell fate decisions during preimplantation development.

Authors:  John S Biggins; Christophe Royer; Tomoko Watanabe; Shankar Srinivas
Journal:  Semin Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2015-09-05       Impact factor: 7.727

View more
  6 in total

1.  Cross-species meta-analysis of transcriptome changes during the morula-to-blastocyst transition: metabolic and physiological changes take center stage.

Authors:  Peter Z Schall; Keith E Latham
Journal:  Am J Physiol Cell Physiol       Date:  2021-10-20       Impact factor: 4.249

Review 2.  Trophectoderm formation: regulation of morphogenesis and gene expressions by RHO, ROCK, cell polarity, and HIPPO signaling.

Authors:  Vernadeth B Alarcon; Yusuke Marikawa
Journal:  Reproduction       Date:  2022-08-22       Impact factor: 3.923

3.  Remdesivir impairs mouse preimplantation embryo development at therapeutic concentrations.

Authors:  Yusuke Marikawa; Vernadeth B Alarcon
Journal:  Reprod Toxicol       Date:  2022-05-21       Impact factor: 3.421

Review 4.  Context-dependent roles of YAP/TAZ in stem cell fates and cancer.

Authors:  Lucy LeBlanc; Nereida Ramirez; Jonghwan Kim
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2021-02-13       Impact factor: 9.261

Review 5.  From the Matrix to the Nucleus and Back: Mechanobiology in the Light of Health, Pathologies, and Regeneration of Oral Periodontal Tissues.

Authors:  Martin Philipp Dieterle; Ayman Husari; Thorsten Steinberg; Xiaoling Wang; Imke Ramminger; Pascal Tomakidi
Journal:  Biomolecules       Date:  2021-05-31

Review 6.  Rho Kinases in Embryonic Development and Stem Cell Research.

Authors:  Jianjian Shi; Lei Wei
Journal:  Arch Immunol Ther Exp (Warsz)       Date:  2022-01-19       Impact factor: 4.291

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.