Literature DB >> 36129261

Beta Human Papillomavirus 8 E6 Induces Micronucleus Formation and Promotes Chromothripsis.

Dalton Dacus1, Steven Stancic2, Sarah R Pollina1, Elizabeth Rifrogiate1, Rachel Palinski2,3, Nicholas A Wallace1.   

Abstract

Cutaneous beta genus human papillomaviruses (β-HPVs) are suspected to promote the development of nonmelanoma skin cancer (NMSC) by destabilizing the host genome. Multiple studies have established the genome destabilizing capacities of β-HPV proteins E6 and E7 as a cofactor with UV. However, the E6 protein from β-HPV8 (HPV8 E6) induces tumors in mice without UV exposure. Here, we examined a UV-independent mechanism of HPV8 E6-induced genome destabilization. We showed that HPV8 E6 reduced the abundance of anaphase bridge resolving helicase, Bloom syndrome protein (BLM). The diminished BLM was associated with increased segregation errors and micronuclei. These HPV8 E6-induced micronuclei had disordered micronuclear envelopes but retained replication and transcription competence. HPV8 E6 decreased antiproliferative responses to micronuclei and time-lapse imaging revealed HPV8 E6 promoted cells with micronuclei to complete mitosis. Finally, whole-genome sequencing revealed that HPV8 E6 induced chromothripsis in nine chromosomes. These data provide insight into mechanisms by which HPV8 E6 induces genome instability independent of UV exposure. IMPORTANCE Some beta genus human papillomaviruses (β-HPVs) may promote skin carcinogenesis by inducing mutations in the host genome. Supporting this, the E6 protein from β-HPV8 (8 E6) promotes skin cancer in mice with or without UV exposure. Many mechanisms by which 8 E6 increases mutations caused by UV have been elucidated, but less is known about how 8 E6 induces mutations without UV. We address that knowledge gap by showing that 8 E6 causes mutations stemming from mitotic errors. Specifically, 8 E6 reduces the abundance of BLM, a helicase that resolves and prevents anaphase bridges. This hinders anaphase bridge resolution and increases their frequency. 8 E6 makes the micronuclei that can result from anaphase bridges more common. These micronuclei often have disrupted envelopes yet retain localization of nuclear-trafficked proteins. 8 E6 promotes the growth of cells with micronuclei and causes chromothripsis, a mutagenic process where hundreds to thousands of mutations occur in a chromosome.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DNA damage; HPV; cell proliferation; genome analysis; micronuclei; mitosis

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 36129261      PMCID: PMC9555153          DOI: 10.1128/jvi.01015-22

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Virol        ISSN: 0022-538X            Impact factor:   6.549


  88 in total

1.  The human papillomavirus type 16 E6 and E7 oncoproteins independently induce numerical and structural chromosome instability.

Authors:  Stefan Duensing; Karl Münger
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2002-12-01       Impact factor: 12.701

2.  Nuclear envelope defects impede a proper response to micronuclear DNA lesions.

Authors:  Mariona Terradas; Marta Martín; Laia Hernández; Laura Tusell; Anna Genescà
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2011-09-16       Impact factor: 2.433

3.  Linking Micronuclei to Chromosome Fragmentation.

Authors:  Emily M Hatch; Martin W Hetzer
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2015-06-18       Impact factor: 41.582

4.  cGAS is essential for cellular senescence.

Authors:  Hui Yang; Hanze Wang; Junyao Ren; Qi Chen; Zhijian J Chen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-05-22       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Spontaneous tumour development in human papillomavirus type 8 E6 transgenic mice and rapid induction by UV-light exposure and wounding.

Authors:  Gian Paolo Marcuzzi; Martin Hufbauer; Hans Udo Kasper; Sönke Jan Weißenborn; Sigrun Smola; Herbert Pfister
Journal:  J Gen Virol       Date:  2009-08-19       Impact factor: 3.891

6.  Unrestrained ESCRT-III drives micronuclear catastrophe and chromosome fragmentation.

Authors:  Sebastian W Schultz; Aurélie Bellanger; Marina Vietri; Carl M Jones; Louise I Petersen; Camilla Raiborg; Ellen Skarpen; Christeen Ramane J Pedurupillay; Ingrid Kjos; Eline Kip; Romy Timmer; Ashish Jain; Philippe Collas; Roland L Knorr; Sushma N Grellscheid; Halim Kusumaatmaja; Andreas Brech; Francesca Micci; Harald Stenmark; Coen Campsteijn
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2020-06-29       Impact factor: 28.213

7.  Beta HPV38 oncoproteins act with a hit-and-run mechanism in ultraviolet radiation-induced skin carcinogenesis in mice.

Authors:  Daniele Viarisio; Karin Müller-Decker; Rosita Accardi; Alexis Robitaille; Matthias Dürst; Katrin Beer; Lars Jansen; Christa Flechtenmacher; Matthias Bozza; Richard Harbottle; Catherine Voegele; Maude Ardin; Jiri Zavadil; Sandra Caldeira; Lutz Gissmann; Massimo Tommasino
Journal:  PLoS Pathog       Date:  2018-01-11       Impact factor: 6.823

Review 8.  Non Melanoma Skin Cancer Pathogenesis Overview.

Authors:  Dario Didona; Giovanni Paolino; Ugo Bottoni; Carmen Cantisani
Journal:  Biomedicines       Date:  2018-01-02

9.  Micronuclei-based model system reveals functional consequences of chromothripsis in human cells.

Authors:  Maja Kneissig; Kristina Keuper; Mirjam S de Pagter; Markus J van Roosmalen; Jana Martin; Hannah Otto; Verena Passerini; Aline Campos Sparr; Ivo Renkens; Fenna Kropveld; Anand Vasudevan; Jason M Sheltzer; Wigard P Kloosterman; Zuzana Storchova
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2019-11-28       Impact factor: 8.140

Review 10.  Prognostic factors of head and neck cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma: a systematic review.

Authors:  Joshua Lubov; Mathilde Labbé; Krystelle Sioufi; Grégoire B Morand; Michael P Hier; Manish Khanna; Khalil Sultanem; Alex M Mlynarek
Journal:  J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2021-09-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.