Shokei Matsumoto1,2, Kyoungwon Jung1,3, Alan Smith1, Raul Coimbra4. 1. Division of Trauma, Surgical Critical Care, Burns, and Acute Care Surgery, University of California San Diego, 200 W. Arbor Drive, San Diego, CA, 92103-8896, USA. 2. Department of Trauma and Emergency Surgery, Saiseikai Yokohamashi Tobu Hospital, Yokohama, Japan. 3. Division of Trauma Surgery, Department of Surgery, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, South Korea. 4. Riverside University Health System Medical Center, Loma Linda University School of Medicine, 26520 Cactus Avenue, Moreno Valley, CA, 92555, USA. raulcoimbra62@yahoo.com.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To establish the preventable and potentially preventable death rates in a mature trauma center and to identify the causes of death and highlight the lessons learned from these cases. METHODS: We analyzed data from a Level-1 Trauma Center Registry, collected over a 15-year period. Data on demographics, timing of death, and potential errors were collected. Deaths were judged as preventable (PD), potentially preventable (PPD), or non-preventable (NPD), following a strict external peer-review process. RESULTS: During the 15-year period, there were 874 deaths, 15 (1.7%) and 6 (0.7%) of which were considered PPDs and PDs, respectively. Patients in the PD and PPD groups were not sicker and had less severe head injury than those in the NPD group. The time-death distribution differed according to preventability. We identified 21 errors in the PD and PPD groups, but only 61 (7.3%) errors in the NPD group (n = 853). Errors in judgement accounted for the majority and for 90.5% of the PD and PPD group errors. CONCLUSIONS: Although the numbers of PDs and PPDs were low, denoting maturity of our trauma center, there are important lessons to be learned about how errors in judgment led to deaths that could have been prevented.
PURPOSE: To establish the preventable and potentially preventable death rates in a mature trauma center and to identify the causes of death and highlight the lessons learned from these cases. METHODS: We analyzed data from a Level-1 Trauma Center Registry, collected over a 15-year period. Data on demographics, timing of death, and potential errors were collected. Deaths were judged as preventable (PD), potentially preventable (PPD), or non-preventable (NPD), following a strict external peer-review process. RESULTS: During the 15-year period, there were 874 deaths, 15 (1.7%) and 6 (0.7%) of which were considered PPDs and PDs, respectively. Patients in the PD and PPD groups were not sicker and had less severe head injury than those in the NPD group. The time-death distribution differed according to preventability. We identified 21 errors in the PD and PPD groups, but only 61 (7.3%) errors in the NPD group (n = 853). Errors in judgement accounted for the majority and for 90.5% of the PD and PPD group errors. CONCLUSIONS: Although the numbers of PDs and PPDs were low, denoting maturity of our trauma center, there are important lessons to be learned about how errors in judgment led to deaths that could have been prevented.
Authors: T P Saltzherr; K W Wendt; P Nieboer; M W N Nijsten; J P Valk; J S K Luitse; K J Ponsen; J C Goslings Journal: Injury Date: 2010-05-01 Impact factor: 2.586
Authors: Demetrios Demetriades; Brian Kimbrell; Ali Salim; George Velmahos; Peter Rhee; Christy Preston; Ginger Gruzinski; Linda Chan Journal: J Am Coll Surg Date: 2005-09 Impact factor: 6.113
Authors: Pedro G R Teixeira; Kenji Inaba; Pantelis Hadjizacharia; Carlos Brown; Ali Salim; Peter Rhee; Timothy Browder; Thomas T Noguchi; Demetrios Demetriades Journal: J Trauma Date: 2007-12
Authors: Pedro G R Teixeira; Kenji Inaba; Ali Salim; Peter Rhee; Carlos Brown; Timothy Browder; Joseph DuBose; Shirley Nomoto; Demetrios Demetriades Journal: Arch Surg Date: 2009-06