Literature DB >> 18212658

Preventable or potentially preventable mortality at a mature trauma center.

Pedro G R Teixeira1, Kenji Inaba, Pantelis Hadjizacharia, Carlos Brown, Ali Salim, Peter Rhee, Timothy Browder, Thomas T Noguchi, Demetrios Demetriades.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to analyze the preventable and potentially preventable deaths occurring at a mature Level I trauma center.
METHODS: All trauma patients that died during their initial hospital admission during an 8-year period (January, 1998 to December, 2005) were analyzed. The deaths were initially reviewed at a weekly Morbidity and Mortality (M&M) conference followed by a multidisciplinary (Trauma Surgery, Critical Care, Emergency Medicine, Neurosurgery, Nursing, and Coroner) Combined Trauma Death Review Committee, and were classified into nonpreventable, potentially preventable, and preventable deaths. All preventable and potentially preventable deaths were identified for the purpose of the study. Quality improvement death forms included data on epidemiology, vital signs, injury severity, type of injury, probability of survival with Trauma and Injury Severity Score methodology, preventability (nonpreventable, potentially preventable, and preventable deaths), errors in the evaluation and management of the patient, and classification of errors (system, judgment, knowledge). Additional injury details, clinical course, circumstances leading to the death and autopsy findings were abstracted from the trauma registry and individual chart review.
RESULTS: During the study period, 35,311 patients meeting trauma registry criteria were admitted and a total of 2,081 (5.9%) deaths occurred. Fifty-one deaths were classified as preventable or potentially preventable deaths (0.1% of admissions, 2.5% of deaths). Eleven of them (0.53% of deaths) were classified as preventable and 40 (1.92% of deaths) as potentially preventable deaths. Mean age was 40 years, 66.7% were men, mean Injury Severity Score was 27, 74.5% were blunt. The most common cause of death was bleeding (20, 39.2%) followed by multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (14, 27.5%) and cardiorespiratory arrest (8, 15.6%). This was caused by a delay in treatment (27, 52.9%), clinical judgment error (11, 21.6%), missed diagnosis (6, 11.8%), technical error (4, 7.8%), and other (3, 5.9%). The deaths peaked at two time periods: 26 (51.1%) during the first 24 hours and 16 (31.4%) after 7 days. Only one patient (2.0%) died in the first hour. The most common location of death was the intensive care unit (28, 54.9%), operating room (13, 25.5%), and emergency room (5, 9.8%).
CONCLUSION: Preventable or potentially preventable deaths are rare but do occur at an academic Level I trauma center. Delay in treatment and error in judgment are the leading causes of preventable and potentially preventable deaths.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18212658     DOI: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31815078ae

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Trauma        ISSN: 0022-5282


  94 in total

1.  Balanced ratio of plasma to packed red blood cells improves outcomes in massive transfusion: A large multicenter study.

Authors:  Jiang-Cun Yang; Cui-Xiang Xu; Yang Sun; Qian-Li Dang; Ling Li; Yong-Gang Xu; Yao-Jun Song; Hong Yan
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2015-04-30       Impact factor: 2.447

2.  Crash testing the dummy: a review of in situ trauma simulation at a Canadian tertiary centre

Authors:  Samuel Minor; Robert Green; Samuel Jessula
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 2.089

3.  Impact of ATLS training on preventable and potentially preventable deaths.

Authors:  Salvador Navarro; Sandra Montmany; Pere Rebasa; Carme Colilles; Anna Pallisera
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Fluid resuscitation of uncontrolled hemorrhage using a hemoglobin-based oxygen carrier: effect of traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Nathan J White; Xu Wang; Nicole Bradbury; Paula F Moon-Massat; Daniel Freilich; Charles Auker; Richard McCarron; Anke Scultetus; Susan A Stern
Journal:  Shock       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 3.454

5.  Efficacy of a high FFP:PRBC transfusion ratio on the survival of severely injured patients: a retrospective study in a single tertiary emergency center in Japan.

Authors:  Daisuke Kudo; Junichi Sasaki; Satoshi Akaishi; Satoshi Yamanouchi; Tomoaki Koakutsu; Tomoyuki Endo; Takeaki Sato; Ryosuke Nomura; Hironao Yuzawa; Michio Kobayashi; Yotaro Shinozawa; Shigeki Kushimoto
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2013-02-19       Impact factor: 2.549

Review 6.  A systematic review of randomized controlled trials exploring the effect of immunomodulative interventions on infection, organ failure, and mortality in trauma patients.

Authors:  Nicole E Spruijt; Tjaakje Visser; Luke Ph Leenen
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2010-08-05       Impact factor: 9.097

7.  Changes in the outcomes of severe trauma patients from 15-year experience in a Western European trauma ICU of Emilia Romagna region (1996-2010). A population cross-sectional survey study.

Authors:  Salomone Di Saverio; Giorgio Gambale; Federico Coccolini; Fausto Catena; Eleonora Giorgini; Luca Ansaloni; Niki Amadori; Carlo Coniglio; Aimone Giugni; Andrea Biscardi; Stefano Magnone; Filippo Filicori; Piergiorgio Cavallo; Silvia Villani; Francesco Cinquantini; Massimo Annicchiarico; Giovanni Gordini; Gregorio Tugnoli
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2013-11-30       Impact factor: 3.445

8.  Pragmatic Randomized Optimal Platelet and Plasma Ratios (PROPPR) Trial: design, rationale and implementation.

Authors:  Sarah Baraniuk; Barbara C Tilley; Deborah J del Junco; Erin E Fox; Gerald van Belle; Charles E Wade; Jeanette M Podbielski; Angela M Beeler; John R Hess; Eileen M Bulger; Martin A Schreiber; Kenji Inaba; Timothy C Fabian; Jeffrey D Kerby; Mitchell Jay Cohen; Christopher N Miller; Sandro Rizoli; Thomas M Scalea; Terence O'Keeffe; Karen J Brasel; Bryan A Cotton; Peter Muskat; John B Holcomb
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2014-06-10       Impact factor: 2.586

9.  Recurrent event frailty models reduced time-varying and other biases in evaluating transfusion protocols for traumatic hemorrhage.

Authors:  Sangbum Choi; Mohammad H Rahbar; Jing Ning; Deborah J Del Junco; Elaheh Rahbar; Chuan Hong; Jin Piao; Erin E Fox; John B Holcomb
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2016-04-29       Impact factor: 6.437

Review 10.  The value of postmortem computed tomography as an alternative for autopsy in trauma victims: a systematic review.

Authors:  M Scholing; T P Saltzherr; P H P Fung Kon Jin; K J Ponsen; J B Reitsma; J S Lameris; J C Goslings
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-05-21       Impact factor: 5.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.