Literature DB >> 24587698

History and background of quality measurement.

Jonathan Chun1, Andrea Chao Bafford1.   

Abstract

Health care quality measurement has become increasingly emphasized, as providers and administrators respond to public and government demands for improved patient care. This article will review the evolution of surgical quality measurement and improvement from its infancy in the 1850s to the vast efforts being undertaken today.

Entities:  

Keywords:  history; quality improvement; quality measures; surgical quality

Year:  2014        PMID: 24587698      PMCID: PMC3926916          DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1366912

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg        ISSN: 1530-9681


  22 in total

1.  Relation of surgical volume to outcome in eight common operations: results from the VA National Surgical Quality Improvement Program.

Authors:  S F Khuri; J Daley; W Henderson; K Hur; M Hossain; D Soybel; K W Kizer; J B Aust; R H Bell; V Chong; J Demakis; P J Fabri; J O Gibbs; F Grover; K Hammermeister; G McDonald; E Passaro; L Phillips; F Scamman; J Spencer; J F Stremple
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Ernest Amory Codman, M.D., and end results of medical care.

Authors:  D Neuhauser
Journal:  Int J Technol Assess Health Care       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 2.188

3.  Evaluating the quality of medical care. 1966.

Authors:  Avedis Donabedian
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 4.911

4.  Washington State's approach to variability in surgical processes/Outcomes: Surgical Clinical Outcomes Assessment Program (SCOAP).

Authors:  David R Flum; Nancy Fisher; Jeffery Thompson; Miriam Marcus-Smith; Michael Florence; Carlos A Pellegrini
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 3.982

5.  Florence Nightingale and healthcare reform.

Authors:  Elizabeth Connelly Kudzma
Journal:  Nurs Sci Q       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 0.883

6.  Does surgical quality improve in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program: an evaluation of all participating hospitals.

Authors:  Bruce L Hall; Barton H Hamilton; Karen Richards; Karl Y Bilimoria; Mark E Cohen; Clifford Y Ko
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Surgeon-related factors and outcome in rectal cancer.

Authors:  G A Porter; C L Soskolne; W W Yakimets; S C Newman
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Using risk-adjusted outcomes to assess clinical practice: an overview of issues pertaining to risk adjustment.

Authors:  L I Iezzoni
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 4.330

9.  Comparison of risk adjustment methodologies in surgical quality improvement.

Authors:  Steven M Steinberg; Michael R Popa; Judith A Michalek; Matthew J Bethel; E Christopher Ellison
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 3.982

10.  The patient safety in surgery study: background, study design, and patient populations.

Authors:  Shukri F Khuri; William G Henderson; Jennifer Daley; Olga Jonasson; R Scott Jones; Darrell A Campbell; Aaron S Fink; Robert M Mentzer; Janet E Steeger
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 6.113

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Public reporting and transparency: a primer on public outcomes reporting.

Authors:  John R Romanelli; Pascal R Fuchshuber; Jonah James Stulberg; Rebecca Brewer Kowalski; Prashant Sinha; Thomas A Aloia; Rocco Orlando
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-06-03       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Trauma center maturity measured by an analysis of preventable and potentially preventable deaths: there is always something to be learned….

Authors:  Shokei Matsumoto; Kyoungwon Jung; Alan Smith; Raul Coimbra
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2018-06-23       Impact factor: 2.549

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.