Literature DB >> 29936514

Potentials and Challenges of the Health Data Cooperative Model.

Ilse van Roessel1, Matthias Reumann2,3, Angela Brand1,2.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Currently, abundances of highly relevant health data are locked up in data silos due to decentralized storage and data protection laws. The health data cooperative (HDC) model is established to make this valuable data available for societal purposes. The aim of this study is to analyse the HDC model and its potentials and challenges.
RESULTS: An HDC is a health data bank. The HDC model has as core principles a cooperative approach, citizen-centredness, not-for-profit structure, data enquiry procedure, worldwide accessibility, cloud computing data storage, open source, and transparency about governance policy. HDC members have access to the HDC platform, which consists of the "core," the "app store," and the "big data." This, respectively, enables the users to collect, store, manage, and share health information, to analyse personal health data, and to conduct big data analytics. Identified potentials of the HDC model are digitization of healthcare information, citizen empowerment, knowledge benefit, patient empowerment, cloud computing data storage, and reduction in healthcare expenses. Nevertheless, there are also challenges linked with this approach, including privacy and data security, citizens' restraint, disclosure of clinical results, big data, and commercial interest. Limitations and Outlook: The results of this article are not generalizable because multiple studies with a limited number of study participants are included. Therefore, it is recommended to undertake further elaborate research on these topics among larger and various groups of individuals. Additionally, more pilots on the HDC model are required before it can be fully implemented. Moreover, when the HDC model becomes operational, further research on its performances should be undertaken.
© 2018 The Author(s) Published by S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Big data; Electronic patient record; Health data cooperative; Mobile health apps; P4 medicine

Year:  2018        PMID: 29936514      PMCID: PMC6159824          DOI: 10.1159/000489994

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Public Health Genomics        ISSN: 1662-4246            Impact factor:   2.000


  31 in total

1.  Unpatients-why patients should own their medical data.

Authors:  Leonard J Kish; Eric J Topol
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 54.908

2.  The experiential knowledge of patients: a new resource for biomedical research?

Authors:  J Francisca Caron-Flinterman; Jacqueline E W Broerse; Joske F G Bunders
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2004-12-21       Impact factor: 4.634

3.  Use of big data for drug development and for public and personal health and care.

Authors:  Lada Leyens; Matthias Reumann; Nuria Malats; Angela Brand
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  2016-11-21       Impact factor: 2.135

4.  Lessons learned from a health record bank start-up.

Authors:  W A Yasnoff; E H Shortliffe
Journal:  Methods Inf Med       Date:  2014-01-30       Impact factor: 2.176

5.  Privacy Policies of Android Diabetes Apps and Sharing of Health Information.

Authors:  Sarah R Blenner; Melanie Köllmer; Adam J Rouse; Nadia Daneshvar; Curry Williams; Lori B Andrews
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2016-03-08       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  An index of barriers for the implementation of personalised medicine and pharmacogenomics in Europe.

Authors:  Denis Horgan; Marleen Jansen; Lada Leyens; Jonathan A Lal; Ralf Sudbrak; Erica Hackenitz; Ulrike Bußhoff; Wolfgang Ballensiefen; Angela Brand
Journal:  Public Health Genomics       Date:  2014-11-15       Impact factor: 2.000

7.  Patient empowerment and the traditional medical model. A case of irreconcilable differences?

Authors:  R M Anderson
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 19.112

8.  Sharing medical data for health research: the early personal health record experience.

Authors:  Elissa R Weitzman; Liljana Kaci; Kenneth D Mandl
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2010-05-25       Impact factor: 5.428

9.  Balancing Benefits and Risks of Immortal Data: Participants' Views of Open Consent in the Personal Genome Project.

Authors:  Oscar A Zarate; Julia Green Brody; Phil Brown; Mónica D Ramirez-Andreotta; Laura Perovich; Jacob Matz
Journal:  Hastings Cent Rep       Date:  2015-12-17       Impact factor: 2.683

10.  European citizens' use of E-health services: a study of seven countries.

Authors:  Hege K Andreassen; Maria M Bujnowska-Fedak; Catherine E Chronaki; Roxana C Dumitru; Iveta Pudule; Silvina Santana; Henning Voss; Rolf Wynn
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2007-04-10       Impact factor: 3.295

View more
  4 in total

1.  From Commercialization to Accountability: Responsible Health Data Collection, Use, and Disclosure for the 21st Century.

Authors:  Deven McGraw; Carolyn Petersen
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2020-05-20       Impact factor: 2.342

2.  What can data trusts for health research learn from participatory governance in biobanks?

Authors:  Richard Milne; Annie Sorbie; Mary Dixon-Woods
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2021-03-19       Impact factor: 5.926

Review 3.  Digital health for optimal supportive care in oncology: benefits, limits, and future perspectives.

Authors:  M Aapro; P Bossi; A Dasari; L Fallowfield; P Gascón; M Geller; K Jordan; J Kim; K Martin; S Porzig
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2020-06-12       Impact factor: 3.603

4.  Community-based Health Data Cooperatives Towards Improving the Immigrant Community Health: A Scoping Review to Inform Policy and Practice.

Authors:  T C Turin; I Naeem; Akmn Nurul; M Vaska; S Goopy; R Rashid; A Kassan; F Aghajafari; I Ferrer; A Kazi; I Sadi; M O'Beirne; C Leduc
Journal:  Int J Popul Data Sci       Date:  2020-06-23
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.