Literature DB >> 24477917

Lessons learned from a health record bank start-up.

W A Yasnoff1, E H Shortliffe.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: This article is part of a Focus Theme of METHODS of Information in Medicine on Health Record Banking.
BACKGROUND: In late summer 2010, an organization was formed in greater Phoenix, Arizona (USA), to introduce a health record bank (HRB) in that community. The effort was initiated after market research and was aimed at engaging 200,000 individuals as members in the first year (5% of the population). It was also intended to evaluate a business model that was based on early adoption by consumers and physicians followed by additional revenue streams related to incremental services and secondary uses of clinical data, always with specific permission from individual members, each of whom controlled all access to his or her own data.
OBJECTIVES: To report on the details of the HRB experience in Phoenix, to describe the sources of problems that were experienced, and to identify lessons that need to be considered in future HRB ventures.
METHODS: We describe staffing for the HRB effort, the computational platform that was developed, the approach to marketing, the engagement of practicing physicians, and the governance model that was developed to guide the HRB design and implementation.
RESULTS: Despite efforts to engage the physician community, limited consumer advertising, and a carefully considered financial strategy, the experiment failed due to insufficient enrollment of individual members. It was discontinued in April 2011.
CONCLUSIONS: Although the major problem with this HRB project was undercapitalization, we believe this effort demonstrated that basic HRB accounts should be free for members and that physician engagement and participation are key elements in constructing an effective marketing channel. Local community governance is essential for trust, and the included population must be large enough to provide sufficient revenues to sustain the resource in the long term.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Health record bank; business model; clinical system implementation; electronic health records; health information exchange; health information infrastructure; personal health records

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24477917     DOI: 10.3414/ME13-02-0030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Methods Inf Med        ISSN: 0026-1270            Impact factor:   2.176


  8 in total

1.  Improving Bridging from Informatics Theory to Practice.

Authors:  R Haux; S Koch
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2015-12-23       Impact factor: 2.342

2.  Overview of recent trans-institutional health network projects in Japan and Germany.

Authors:  Maren Juhr; Reinhold Haux; Takahiro Suzuki; Katsuhiko Takabayashi
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2015-03-03       Impact factor: 4.460

3.  Adoption of a Nationwide Shared Medical Record in France: Lessons Learnt after 5 Years of Deployment.

Authors:  Brigitte Séroussi; Jacques Bouaud
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2017-02-10

4.  A proposal for financially sustainable population health organizations.

Authors:  William A Yasnoff; Edward H Shortliffe; Stephen M Shortell
Journal:  Popul Health Manag       Date:  2014-07-21       Impact factor: 2.459

5.  Potentials and Challenges of the Health Data Cooperative Model.

Authors:  Ilse van Roessel; Matthias Reumann; Angela Brand
Journal:  Public Health Genomics       Date:  2018-06-22       Impact factor: 2.000

6.  A visual grid to digitally record an Ayurvedic Prakriti assessment; a first step toward integrated electronic health records.

Authors:  Andrew Stranieri; Kerryn Butler-Henderson; Tony Sahama; Pathirage Kamal Perera; Jonas Lima Da Silva; Danwin Pelonio; Sai Suman Manjunath; Dharini Raghavachar
Journal:  J Tradit Complement Med       Date:  2016-07-12

7.  Electronic Health Record Patient Portal Adoption by Health Care Consumers: An Acceptance Model and Survey.

Authors:  Jorge Tavares; Tiago Oliveira
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2016-03-02       Impact factor: 5.428

8.  Electronic Health Record Portal Adoption: a cross country analysis.

Authors:  Jorge Tavares; Tiago Oliveira
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2017-07-05       Impact factor: 2.796

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.