Literature DB >> 36199509

Complication and revision rates after reverse total shoulder revision from hemiarthroplasty: a systematic review.

Arjun K Reddy1, Jake X Checketts2, B Joshua Stephens3, J Michael Anderson1, Craig M Cooper1, Tyler Hunt4, Keith Fishbeck2, Marshall Boose2, Byron Detweiler2, Brian Chalkin2, Brent L Norris2.   

Abstract

Background: Thus, the purpose of the present study was to (1) characterize common postoperative complications and (2) quantify the rates of revision in patients undergoing hemiarthroplasty to reverse total shoulder arthroplasty revisional surgery. We hypothesize that hardware loosenings will be the most common complication to occur in the sample, with the humeral component being the most common loosening.
Methods: This systematic review adhered to PRISMA reporting guideline. For our inclusion criteria, we included any study that contained intraoperative and/or postoperative complication data, and revision rates on patients who had undergone revision reverse total shoulder arthroplasty due to a failed hemiarthroplasty. Complications include neurologic injury, deep surgical site infections, hardware loosening/prosthetic instability, and postoperative fractures (acromion, glenoid, and humeral fractures).
Results: The study contained 22 studies that assessed complications from shoulders that had revision reverse total shoulder arthroplasty from a hemiarthroplasty, with a total sample of 925 shoulders. We found that the most common complication to occur was hardware loosenings (5.3%), and of the hardware loosenings, humeral loosenings (3.8%) were the most common. The revision rate was found to be 10.7%.
Conclusion: This systematic review found that revision reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for failed hemiarthroplasty has a high overall complication and reintervention rates, specifically for hardware loosening and revision rates.
© 2021 The British Elbow & Shoulder Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty; complication; hemiarthroplasty; systematic reviews

Year:  2021        PMID: 36199509      PMCID: PMC9527483          DOI: 10.1177/17585732211019390

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Shoulder Elbow        ISSN: 1758-5732


  53 in total

Review 1.  Grammont's idea: The story of Paul Grammont's functional surgery concept and the development of the reverse principle.

Authors:  Emmanuel Baulot; François Sirveaux; Pascal Boileau
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Range of impingement-free abduction and adduction deficit after reverse shoulder arthroplasty. Hierarchy of surgical and implant-design-related factors.

Authors:  Sergio Gutiérrez; Charles A Comiskey; Zong-Ping Luo; Derek R Pupello; Mark A Frankle
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 5.284

3.  The classic: Delta shoulder prosthesis for rotator cuff rupture. 1993.

Authors:  Paul M Grammont; Emmanuel Baulot
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Does the etiology of a failed hemiarthroplasty affect outcomes when revised to a reverse shoulder arthroplasty?

Authors:  Kimberly J Franke; Kaitlyn N Christmas; Katheryne L Downes; Mark A Mighell; Mark A Frankle
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2019-11-06       Impact factor: 3.019

5.  The effect of proximal humeral bone loss on revision reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Scott P Stephens; Kevin C Paisley; M Russell Giveans; Michael A Wirth
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2015-04-07       Impact factor: 3.019

6.  Studies of surgical outcome after patellar tendinopathy: clinical significance of methodological deficiencies and guidelines for future studies. Victorian Institute of Sport Tendon Study Group.

Authors:  B D Coleman; K M Khan; N Maffulli; J L Cook; J D Wark
Journal:  Scand J Med Sci Sports       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 4.221

7.  Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a review of results according to etiology.

Authors:  Bryan Wall; Laurent Nové-Josserand; Daniel P O'Connor; T Bradley Edwards; Gilles Walch
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 5.284

8.  One-stage exchange of septic shoulder arthroplasty following a standardized treatment algorithm.

Authors:  Florian Sevelda; Bernd Fink
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2018-08-10       Impact factor: 3.019

9.  Revision to reverse shoulder arthroplasty with retention of the humeral component.

Authors:  Birgit S Werner; Dorota Boehm; Frank Gohlke
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2013-09-16       Impact factor: 3.717

Review 10.  Clinical outcomes and complications of reverse shoulder arthroplasty used for failed prior shoulder surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Aaron J Bois; Paige Knight; Khalifa Alhojailan; Kamal I Bohsali
Journal:  JSES Int       Date:  2020-01-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.