Literature DB >> 29931527

Oral quality of life after buccal mucosal graft harvest for substitution urethroplasty. More than a bite?

E Morán1, M A Bonillo2, L Fernández-Estevan3, E Martínez-Cuenca2, S Arlandis2, E Broseta2, F Boronat2.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The aim of our study was to analyze the oral quality of life (QoL) in patients with urethral stricture treated with BMG by using a validated questionnaire (OIDP).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective, single-arm, observational single-centre study of a cohort of patients scheduled for BMG Urethroplasty was conducted. OIDP assesses the impact of oral conditions on daily activities including an oral QoL question (0-10). The questionnaire was self-administered before, 3 months postoperatively and at the end of the study. Means, pre- and postoperatively, were compared. Multivariate analysis was performed to analyze the risk factors for a low quality of life (<8) after surgery.
RESULTS: We included 41 patients (2013-2017). The mean preoperative oral QoL was 9.33 points (SD1.16). Preoperative mean OIDP dimensional score and global score were 0,5 (SD:0.02) and 0,8%. The most frequently preoperative altered aspect was hygiene. Mean oral QoL, 3 months after surgery, was 8,56 (SD1.89) and OIDP dimensional score and global score were 0,67 (SD0.21) and 1,1%. Mean oral QoL at the end of the study (mean 3,12 years) was 8,50 (SD1.13). OIDP dimensional score and global score were 0,7 (SD 0.16) and 1,1%.The most frequently altered aspect at the end of the study was eating. No statistical (p = 0.07) decrease in oral QoL was found. The increase in OIDP dimensional and global score was also not statistically significant. Neither age nor smoking, diabetes mellitus, cardiovascular morbidity, previous OIDP score, width, length of the graft, or surgery success could explain a low oral QoL alter graft harvesting.
CONCLUSIONS: BMG harvesting is not free of problems at the donor site. Eating seems to be the most affected aspect after surgery. Nevertheless, those sequelae do not induce a reduction in oral QoL.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Buccal mucosal graft; Donor site; OIDP; Oral quality of life; Questionnaire; Urethroplasty

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29931527     DOI: 10.1007/s00345-018-2381-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Urol        ISSN: 0724-4983            Impact factor:   4.226


  16 in total

Review 1.  The potential role of tissue-engineered urethral substitution: clinical and preclinical studies.

Authors:  Anthony Atala; Mikhail Danilevskiy; Alexey Lyundup; Petr Glybochko; Denis Butnaru; Andrey Vinarov; James J Yoo
Journal:  J Tissue Eng Regen Med       Date:  2015-12-03       Impact factor: 3.963

2.  Factorial structure and cross-cultural invariance of the Oral Impacts on Daily Performances.

Authors:  A N Astrøm; M Mtaya
Journal:  Eur J Oral Sci       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 2.612

Review 3.  SIU/ICUD Consultation on Urethral Strictures: The management of anterior urethral stricture disease using substitution urethroplasty.

Authors:  Christopher Chapple; Daniela Andrich; Anthony Atala; Guido Barbagli; André Cavalcanti; Sanjay Kulkarni; Altaf Mangera; Yosuke Nakajima
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2014-01-08       Impact factor: 2.649

Review 4.  Measuring oral health: a conceptual framework.

Authors:  D Locker
Journal:  Community Dent Health       Date:  1988-03       Impact factor: 1.349

Review 5.  Refractory Urethral Stricture Management: Indications for Alternative Grafts and Flaps.

Authors:  Alison C Levy; Alex J Vanni
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2018-02-26       Impact factor: 3.092

6.  Urethral Reconstruction Using Everted Saphenous Vein Graft in a Rabbit Model: One-Year Outcomes.

Authors:  Yujie Xu; Zhou Shen; Gang Liu; Bing Liu; Xiaoliang Hua; Yechen Xiang; Chuanjiang Dong; Bing Li
Journal:  Urol Int       Date:  2017-03-23       Impact factor: 2.089

Review 7.  Morbidity associated with oral mucosa harvest for urological reconstruction: an overview.

Authors:  Michael R Markiewicz; James L DeSantis; Joseph E Margarone; M Anthony Pogrel; Sung-Kiang Chuang
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 1.895

8.  Oral complications after buccal mucosal graft harvest for urethroplasty.

Authors:  Norman Dublin; Laurence H Stewart
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 5.588

9.  Buccal Versus Lingual Mucosa Graft in Anterior Urethroplasty: A Prospective Comparison of Surgical Outcome and Donor Site Morbidity.

Authors:  N Lumen; S Vierstraete-Verlinde; W Oosterlinck; P Hoebeke; E Palminteri; C Goes; H Maes; A-F Spinoit
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2015-08-01       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 10.  Measures of adult pain: Visual Analog Scale for Pain (VAS Pain), Numeric Rating Scale for Pain (NRS Pain), McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ), Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ), Chronic Pain Grade Scale (CPGS), Short Form-36 Bodily Pain Scale (SF-36 BPS), and Measure of Intermittent and Constant Osteoarthritis Pain (ICOAP).

Authors:  Gillian A Hawker; Samra Mian; Tetyana Kendzerska; Melissa French
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 4.794

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.