Literature DB >> 18355598

Morbidity associated with oral mucosa harvest for urological reconstruction: an overview.

Michael R Markiewicz1, James L DeSantis, Joseph E Margarone, M Anthony Pogrel, Sung-Kiang Chuang.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To present a systematic review of the literature regarding complications associated with the donor site following oral mucosa harvest for urethral reconstruction.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The authors conducted a database search for relevant literature during the time period January 1966 through January 1, 2007, regarding complications associated with oral mucosa graft harvest for use in urethral transplantation. Bibliographies of database hits were searched for pertinent papers.
RESULTS: The most common harvest sites were the buccal and mandibular labial mucosa. The most frequent complications at both mucosal harvest sites were scarring and contracture. These 2 complications limit jaw opening and have been found to last for as long as 4 weeks. Labial mucosa harvest is associated with the additional morbidity of perioral neurosensory defect because of the procedure's proximity to the mental nerve. When nerve damage occurs, it usually subsides within 10 months postsurgery. Patients report relatively the same quality of life following harvest from both donor sites, although buccal mucosa harvest was associated with less postoperative discomfort, less neurosensory defect, and less salivary flow change. Following oral mucosa harvest, patients should be able to ingest oral fluids within 24 hours, solid foods within 2 days, and return to a normal dietary regimen within 1 week of harvest.
CONCLUSION: When harvesting oral mucosa for urethral reconstruction, sound surgical principles will ensure the patient the best chance of avoiding postoperative complications at the donor site. Oral and maxillofacial surgeons should advise both urologists and their patients of the potential complications associated with both oral mucosa harvesting sites.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18355598     DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2007.11.023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 0278-2391            Impact factor:   1.895


  20 in total

1.  [Urethral reconstructive surgery].

Authors:  S Hauser; G Fechner; J Ellinger; S C Müller
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 2.  The use of autologous buccal mucosa grafts in vaginal reconstruction.

Authors:  Gwen M Grimsby; Linda A Baker
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 3.  A Review of Buccal Mucosa Graft Ureteroplasty.

Authors:  Ziho Lee; Aryeh Y Keehn; Matthew E Sterling; Michael J Metro; Daniel D Eun
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 4.  [Redo urethroplasty with buccal mucosa].

Authors:  C M Rosenbaum; L Ernst; O Engel; R Dahlem; M Fisch; L A Kluth
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 0.639

5.  Donor site morbidity in oral mucosa graft urethroplasty: implications of tobacco consumption.

Authors:  Rahul Janak Sinha; Vishwajeet Singh; S N Sankhwar; Divakar Dalela
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2009-09-21       Impact factor: 2.264

Review 6.  Graft surgery in extensive urethral stricture disease.

Authors:  Miroslav L Djordjevic
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 3.092

7.  Comparison of uni-and bilateral buccal mucosa harvesting in terms of oral morbidity.

Authors:  İbrahim Halil Bozkurt; Fatih Yalçınkaya; Memduh Nurettin Sertçelik; Kürşad Zengin
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2013-03

8.  Evaluation of intraoral complications of buccal mucosa graft in augmentation urethroplasty.

Authors:  Mehmet Akyüz; Mustafa Güneş; Orhan Koca; Zülfü Sertkaya; Hüseyin Kanberoğlu; Muhammet İhsan Karaman
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2014-09

9.  The reconstruction of a contracted eye socket using a post-auricular full-thickness skin graft.

Authors:  Yi Hsuan Wei; Shu Lang Liao
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-03-06       Impact factor: 3.117

10.  Oral quality of life after buccal mucosal graft harvest for substitution urethroplasty. More than a bite?

Authors:  E Morán; M A Bonillo; L Fernández-Estevan; E Martínez-Cuenca; S Arlandis; E Broseta; F Boronat
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2018-06-21       Impact factor: 4.226

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.