Literature DB >> 15476524

Oral complications after buccal mucosal graft harvest for urethroplasty.

Norman Dublin1, Laurence H Stewart.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To report long-term oral complications after buccal mucosal graft (BMG) harvesting for urethroplasty. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In a retrospective study of all patients who had BMG harvesting for urethroplasty from April 1996 to September 2002, telephone interviews were conducted using a standard proforma.
RESULTS: Thirty-five patients were identified but only 30 (mean age 48.3 years, range 24-86) could be contacted; they had had 31 operations. Soon after surgery (the first 48 h), 22 (73%) of the patients had little or no oral pain; 70% and 90% of the patients were able to eat and drink, respectively; 59% complained of numbness and 75% complained of tightness of the mouth. At discharge 6 days after surgery 90% of patients had little or no oral pain and all were able to eat and drink, but 10% had moderate-to-severe oral pain, 39% had oral numbness, and 52% had tightness of the mouth. At the time of interview, 16% of patients had oral numbness (mean duration 13.6 months) and 32% had tightness of the mouth (mean duration 20.9 months). In answer to the question of whether they would have their cheek mucosa harvested again if required, 74% responded 'yes', 3% 'no', and 23% had mixed feelings.
CONCLUSIONS: BMG harvesting is a good operation, as most patients were satisfied, but it is not without long-term complications and patients should be adequately informed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15476524     DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2004.05048.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJU Int        ISSN: 1464-4096            Impact factor:   5.588


  37 in total

Review 1.  Stem Cell Therapy: Current Applications and Potential for Urology.

Authors:  Bridget Wiafe; Peter D Metcalfe; Adetola B Adesida
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 2.  Treatment of Peyronie's disease: 2012 update.

Authors:  Ege Can Serefoglu; Wayne J G Hellstrom
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 3.092

3.  Cell-seeded tubularized scaffolds for reconstruction of long urethral defects: a preclinical study.

Authors:  Hazem Orabi; Tamer AbouShwareb; Yuanyuan Zhang; James J Yoo; Anthony Atala
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2012-07-31       Impact factor: 20.096

Review 4.  Urethral stricture: etiology, investigation and treatments.

Authors:  Stefan Tritschler; Alexander Roosen; Claudius Füllhase; Christian G Stief; Herbert Rübben
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2013-03-29       Impact factor: 5.594

5.  [Oral mucosa for reconstructive urethral surgery].

Authors:  R Mayr; A Pycha
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 0.639

6.  Outcome of Dorsal Onlay Buccal Mucosa Substitution Urethroplasty in Long Strictures of Anterior Urethra.

Authors:  D K Jain; R Talwar
Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India       Date:  2011-07-21

7.  Single-stage dorsal inlay for reconstruction of recurrent peno-glandular stenosis.

Authors:  Patrick J Bastian; Margit Mayer; Stefan Tritschler; Alexander Roosen; Philipp Nuhn; Ricarda M Bauer; Christian Gozzi
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2011-10-12       Impact factor: 4.226

8.  Donor site morbidity in oral mucosa graft urethroplasty: implications of tobacco consumption.

Authors:  Rahul Janak Sinha; Vishwajeet Singh; S N Sankhwar; Divakar Dalela
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2009-09-21       Impact factor: 2.264

Review 9.  Graft surgery in extensive urethral stricture disease.

Authors:  Miroslav L Djordjevic
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 3.092

10.  Buccal mucosa urethroplasty: a 10-year retrospective review of maxillofacial and urological outcomes.

Authors:  J E O'Connell; I M Cullen; C Murphy; H Flood; G J Kearns
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2014-07-04       Impact factor: 1.568

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.