Literature DB >> 29931483

Changes in the sensorimotor system and semitendinosus muscle morphometry after arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a prospective cohort study with 1-year follow-up.

Marialuisa Gandolfi1,2, Matteo Ricci3,4, Elena Sambugaro3, Nicola Valè5, Eleonora Dimitrova5, Andrea Meschieri5, Silvano Grazioli5,4, Alessandro Picelli5, Calogero Foti6, Francesco Rulli6, Nicola Smania5.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the time course of sensorimotor integration processes involved in balance capability during 1-year follow-up after arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. To evaluate whether an association exists between balance performance and semitendinosus muscle morphometry features.
METHODS: Twenty-seven patients (mean age 29.6 ± 10.8 years) were prospectively followed with stabilometry and ultrasound at 3 months (T0), 6 months (T1), and 1 year (T2) after arthroscopic ACL reconstruction. Body sway and sensorimotor integration processes were evaluated by calculating the percentage difference of sway (PDS) on two surface conditions.
RESULTS: A significant difference in PDS was observed over time (p < 0.001). The interaction "Time × Condition" showed significant differences (p = 0.02), with worse performance on the compliant than the firm surface. There was a significant difference in CSA (p < 0.001), MT (p < 0.001), and %HRD (p < 0.001) over time. The interaction "Time*side" was significant for CSA (p = 0.02) and %HRD (p = 0.01). A negative correlation between PDS on compliant surface and CSA was measured at 3- (r = - 0.71, n = 27, p < 0.001) and 6-month post-surgery (r = - 0.47, n = 27, p = 0.013).
CONCLUSIONS: Balance was regained within the first 6 months after surgery, while morphometry of the semitendinosus muscle improved mostly between 6 and 12 months in patients who returned to sports activities. Balance capabilities paralleled semitendinosus muscle morphometry improvements. The instrumental assessment of sensorimotor integration processes is relevant in clinical practice as screening tests for primary and secondary prevention of ACL injury. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prospective studies, Level II.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Gait; Postural balance; Proprioception; Sonoelastography; Ultrasonography

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29931483     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-018-5020-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  23 in total

1.  Rehabilitation procedures in the management of gait disorders in the elderly.

Authors:  M Gandolfi; E Dimitrova; F Nicolli; A Modenese; A Serina; A Waldner; M Tinazzi; G Squintani; N Smania; C Geroin
Journal:  Minerva Med       Date:  2015-10-27       Impact factor: 4.806

2.  The effects of semitendinosus and gracilis harvest in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Robert T Burks; Julia Crim; Barbara P Fink; Douglas N Boylan; Patrick E Greis
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 4.772

3.  Reliability of panoramic ultrasound imaging in simultaneously examining muscle size and quality of the hamstring muscles in young, healthy males and females.

Authors:  Ty B Palmer; Kazuma Akehi; Ryan M Thiele; Doug B Smith; Brennan J Thompson
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 2.998

Review 4.  Basic biomechanic principles of knee instability.

Authors:  Jason P Zlotnicki; Jan-Hendrik Naendrup; Gerald A Ferrer; Richard E Debski
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2016-06

Review 5.  Is postural control restored following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction? A systematic review.

Authors:  Brooke E Howells; Clare L Ardern; Kate E Webster
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-02-23       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Evaluation of knee ligament surgery results with special emphasis on use of a scoring scale.

Authors:  J Lysholm; J Gillquist
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1982 May-Jun       Impact factor: 6.202

7.  Individual factors affecting stabilometry and one-leg hop test in 75 healthy subjects, aged 15-44 years.

Authors:  E Ageberg; R Zätterström; T Fridén; U Moritz
Journal:  Scand J Med Sci Sports       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 4.221

Review 8.  Eight clinical conundrums relating to anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury in sport: recent evidence and a personal reflection.

Authors:  Per A Renström
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2012-08-31       Impact factor: 13.800

Review 9.  Clinical practice. Anterior cruciate ligament tear.

Authors:  Kurt P Spindler; Rick W Wright
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2008-11-13       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Clinical course and recommendations for patients after anterior cruciate ligament injury and subsequent reconstruction: A narrative review.

Authors:  Alli Gokeler; Bart Dingenen; Caroline Mouton; Romain Seil
Journal:  EFORT Open Rev       Date:  2017-10-09
View more
  3 in total

1.  Lower Limb Muscle Size after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Benjamin Dutaillis; Nirav Maniar; David A Opar; Jack T Hickey; Ryan G Timmins
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2021-01-25       Impact factor: 11.136

2.  Pre-Planned and Non-Planned Agility in Patients Ongoing Rehabilitation after Knee Surgery: Design, Reliability and Validity of the Newly Developed Testing Protocols.

Authors:  Ivan Peric; Miodrag Spasic; Dario Novak; Sergej Ostojic; Damir Sekulic
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2021-01-19

3.  The accuracy of MRI in the diagnosis of anterior cruciate ligament injury.

Authors:  Mengou Zhao; Ying Zhou; Junru Chang; Jie Hu; Huixia Liu; Shuhang Wang; Donglei Si; Yaqin Yuan; Haiyan Li
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2020-12
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.