Literature DB >> 16226644

The effects of semitendinosus and gracilis harvest in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Robert T Burks1, Julia Crim, Barbara P Fink, Douglas N Boylan, Patrick E Greis.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: There is significant debate concerning the morbidity of hamstring harvest for use during anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. We hypothesized that harvest of the semitendinosus and gracilis tendons for ACL reconstruction would result in no measurable hamstring weakness, but that abnormalities of the semitendinosus and gracilis muscle would be observed on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans. TYPE OF STUDY: Case series.
METHODS: Nine patients undergoing ACL reconstruction with doubled semitendinosus and gracilis tendons had MRI cross-sectional area measurements of both limbs made from axial images and muscle contour was studied on coronal images at 3 and 12 months. The semitendinosus, semimembranosus, gracilis, sartorius, and biceps muscles were evaluated. Isokinetic testing was performed on the operative and nonoperative legs at 60 degrees and 180 degrees per second at 6 and 12 months postoperatively.
RESULTS: The gracilis cross-sectional area at 1 year averaged 2 cm2 on the operative side and 3.7 cm2 on the contralateral side. The semitendinosus averaged 2.1 cm2 on the operative side and 6.6 cm2 on the contralateral side at 1 year. Both of these differences were statistically significant (P < .05). In most cases, the semitendinosus muscle was retracted. Distally, the gracilis and occasionally the semitendinosus were blending with the gastrocnemius or sartorial fascia. The gracilis and semitendinosus in 1 case extended to near the original attachment site. Hamstring strength testing revealed a 26% deficit on the operative side at 60 degrees/second at 6 months and 16% at 180 degrees/second. At 12 months the mean 60 degrees/second deficit was 21% and the deficit at 180 degrees/second was 13%.
CONCLUSIONS: At 1 year, the semitendinosus and gracilis muscles showed significant and persistent atrophy on the operative side and frequent retraction of the semitendinosus muscle belly. There were also hamstring strength deficits persisting at 1 year after the use of the tendons for ACL reconstruction. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16226644     DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2005.07.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arthroscopy        ISSN: 0749-8063            Impact factor:   4.772


  21 in total

1.  Prospective comparison of auto and allograft hamstring tendon constructs for ACL reconstruction.

Authors:  Cory M Edgar; Scott Zimmer; Sanjeev Kakar; Hugh Jones; Anthony A Schepsis
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-06-25       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Biomechanical evaluation of four femoral fixation configurations in a simulated anterior cruciate ligament replacement using a new generation of Ligament Advanced Reinforcement System (LARS™ AC).

Authors:  Olivier Barbier; Sandra Guérard; Philippe Boisrenoult; Patricia Thoreux
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2015-01-30

3.  Changes in the sensorimotor system and semitendinosus muscle morphometry after arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a prospective cohort study with 1-year follow-up.

Authors:  Marialuisa Gandolfi; Matteo Ricci; Elena Sambugaro; Nicola Valè; Eleonora Dimitrova; Andrea Meschieri; Silvano Grazioli; Alessandro Picelli; Calogero Foti; Francesco Rulli; Nicola Smania
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2018-06-21       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Structural and functional analysis of the semitendinosus tendon after harvest for soft tissue reconstructive procedures: a dynamic ultrasonographic study.

Authors:  Asheesh Bedi; Ramesh C Srinivasan; Michael J Salata; Brian Downie; Jon A Jacobson; Edward M Wojtys
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-04-05       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Fatigue Behavior of Nitinol Anterior Cruciate Ligament Graft and Inappropriate Femoral Tunnel Placement: Single-Stage Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Surgery.

Authors:  Fatih Karaaslan; Sinan Karaoğlu
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2017-04-17

Review 6.  Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with synthetic grafts. A review of literature.

Authors:  Claudio Legnani; Alberto Ventura; Clara Terzaghi; Enrico Borgo; Walter Albisetti
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-02-16       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  Evaluation of regeneration of semitendinosus tendon using ultrasound imaging and isokinetic strength testing after graft harvest for arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Suresh Perumal; K A Thiyagarajan; A Prakash; S Arumugam
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2020-07-22

Review 8.  Factors influencing the long-term behavior of extracellular matrix-derived scaffolds for musculoskeletal soft tissue repair.

Authors:  Christopher R Rowland; Dianne Little; Farshid Guilak
Journal:  J Long Term Eff Med Implants       Date:  2012

9.  The natural history of donor hamstrings unit after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a prospective MRI scan assessment.

Authors:  Ioannis Tsifountoudis; Ilias Bisbinas; Ioannis Kalaitzoglou; George Markopoulos; Aphrodite Haritandi; Athanasios Dimitriadis; Stergios Papastergiou
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-08-04       Impact factor: 4.342

10.  Operative treatment for the painful posterior thigh after hamstring autograft harvesting.

Authors:  Mikko Laakso; Jussi Kosola; Pekka Niemi; Keijo Mäkelä; Juha Ranne; Sakari Orava; Lasse Lempainen
Journal:  Muscles Ligaments Tendons J       Date:  2018-01-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.