Literature DB >> 29928603

The compression of L5 nerve root, single or double sites?-radiographic graded signs, intra-operative detect technique and clinical outcomes.

Ai-Min Wu1,2, Kai Zhang1, Xun-Lin Li1, Xiao-Fei Cheng1, Tang-Jun Zhou1, Lin Du1, Chen Chen1, Hai-Jun Tian1, Xiao-Jiang Sun1, Chang-Qing Zhao1, Yan Michael Li3, Jie Zhao1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The L5 nerve root could be compressed at both L4-5 and L5-S1 regions. If L5 nerve root has confirmed compression at L4-5 level and questionable compression at L5-S1 foramina, performing both surgeries at L4-5 and L5-S1 levels may induce unnecessary extra surgery on L5-S1; however, ignoring foraminal stenosis of L5/S1 may require re-exploration.
METHODS: Two hundred seventeen patients with L5 nerve root compressed at L4-5 lateral access were performed with L4-5 decompression and interbody fusion. Lee et al. grade classification was used to assess the foraminal stenosis of L5-S1 preoperatively. Nerve root probe was designed and used to detect if there were foraminal stenosis at L5-S1 level that compressing the exiting L5 nerve root. Visual analog scale (VAS) of low back pain, leg pain and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) were used to assess clinical outcomes.
RESULTS: For all of 217 patients who underwent L4-5 surgery, L5-S1 foramina were preoperatively assessed as: grade 0: 125 cases, grade 1: 58 cases, grade 2: 23 cases, and grade 3: 11 cases. After intra-operative L5 nerve root detection, 11/11 patients with grade 3 radiographic foraminal stenosis, 6/23 (26.1%) with grade 2 and 2/58 (3.4%) who had grade 1 underwent L4-5 and L5-S1 transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF), the others received only L4-5 TLIF. Compared to pre-operative baseline data, both L4-5 TLIF and L4-5 and L5-S1 TLIF groups had significant decreased VAS of low back pain and leg pain, and ODI at 3 and 24 months after operation.
CONCLUSIONS: We suggested that our novel nerve root probe combined with pre-operative radiographic grade may be helpful to surgeons to identify the single or double compression of L5 nerve root and make a more precise surgical strategy to improve surgical outcome than the method depended on pre-operative radiographic grade alone.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Lumbar stenosis; decompression; foraminal stenosis; lumbar arthrodesis

Year:  2018        PMID: 29928603      PMCID: PMC5989090          DOI: 10.21037/qims.2018.05.08

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg        ISSN: 2223-4306


  22 in total

1.  Diagnosis and operative treatment of intraforaminal and extraforaminal nerve root compression.

Authors:  J Kunogi; M Hasue
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  South Korean degenerative spondylolisthesis patients had surgical treatment at earlier age than Japanese, American, and European patients: a published literature observation.

Authors:  Zoltán Káplár; Yì-Xiáng J Wáng
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2016-12

3.  Re-exploration of the lumbar spine following simple discectomy: a review of 23 cases.

Authors:  T Shiraishi; H V Crock
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 4.  Management of lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  Jon Lurie; Christy Tomkins-Lane
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2016-01-04

5.  Comparison of plain radiographs with CT scan to evaluate interbody fusion following the use of titanium interbody cages and transpedicular instrumentation.

Authors:  Rajesh R Shah; Saeed Mohammed; Asif Saifuddin; Benjamin A Taylor
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2003-05-07       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Etiology of long-term failures of lumbar spine surgery.

Authors:  Alexis Waguespack; Jerome Schofferman; Paul Slosar; James Reynolds
Journal:  Pain Med       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 3.750

7.  The natural history of root entrapment syndrome.

Authors:  R W Porter; C Hibbert; C Evans
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1984 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: an evidence-based clinical guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  William C Watters; Jamie Baisden; Thomas J Gilbert; Scott Kreiner; Daniel K Resnick; Christopher M Bono; Gary Ghiselli; Michael H Heggeness; Daniel J Mazanec; Conor O'Neill; Charles A Reitman; William O Shaffer; Jeffrey T Summers; John F Toton
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 4.166

9.  Fusion assessment of posterior lumbar interbody fusion using radiolucent cages: X-ray films and helical computed tomography scans compared with surgical exploration of fusion.

Authors:  Guy R Fogel; John S Toohey; Arvo Neidre; John W Brantigan
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2007-05-29       Impact factor: 4.166

10.  Correlation between MRI Grading System and Surgical Findings for Lumbar Foraminal Stenosis.

Authors:  Tae Seok Jeong; Yong Ahn; Sang Gu Lee; Woo Kyung Kim; Seong Son; Jung Hwa Kwon
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2017-07-31
View more
  2 in total

1.  Optimal medial transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion approach with five extensive options: A simulated study on three-dimensional digital reconstructed images.

Authors:  Ai-Min Wu; Xun-Lin Li; Hai-Jun Tian; Kai Zhang; Chang-Qing Zhao; Sun-Ren Sheng; Yan Lin; Wen-Fei Ni; Xiang-Yang Wang; Jie Zhao
Journal:  J Orthop Translat       Date:  2018-08-06       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Biomechanical properties of novel transpedicular transdiscal screw fixation with interbody arthrodesis technique in lumbar spine: A finite element study.

Authors:  Qing-Bo Lv; Xiang Gao; Xiang-Xiang Pan; Hai-Ming Jin; Xiao-Ting Lou; Shu-Min Li; Ying-Zhao Yan; Cong-Cong Wu; Yan Lin; Wen-Fei Ni; Xiang-Yang Wang; Ai-Min Wu
Journal:  J Orthop Translat       Date:  2018-09-10       Impact factor: 5.191

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.