Literature DB >> 6236567

The natural history of root entrapment syndrome.

R W Porter, C Hibbert, C Evans.   

Abstract

An attempt was made to recognize entrapment of the lumbar root within the root canal using four criteria; (1) severe, constant root pain to the lower leg, (2) pain unrelieved by bed rest, (3) minimal tension signs, and (4) patients over 40 years of age. Two hundred forty-nine patients fulfilled the criteria, representing 11% of patients attending a back pain clinic. Most had restricted spinal extension, but few had abnormal neurologic signs. Degenerative change was common, especially disc space reduction. Central canal size measured by ultrasound was normal, compatible with a variable past history of back pain. Patients with a long history of back pain numbered 80%, and 90.4% were managed by nonoperative means. Although 78% of these still had some root pain between 1 and 4 years after first attendance, most of them were not troubled sufficiently to have sought alternative help.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6236567     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-198405000-00017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  26 in total

1.  Clinical outcomes of microscopic decompression for degenerative lumbar foraminal stenosis: a comparison between patients with and without degenerative lumbar scoliosis.

Authors:  Kentaro Yamada; Hideki Matsuda; Masaharu Nabeta; Hiroshi Habunaga; Akinobu Suzuki; Hiroaki Nakamura
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-10-15       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Roentgenographic and computed tomographic findings in symptomatic lumbar foraminal stenosis.

Authors:  Katsutaka Yamada; Yoichi Aota; Takayuki Higashi; Ko Ishida; Takanori Niimura; Tomoyuki Konno; Tomoyuki Saito
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-11-21       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 3.  Lumbar foraminal stenosis, the hidden stenosis including at L5/S1.

Authors:  Sumihisa Orita; Kazuhide Inage; Yawara Eguchi; Go Kubota; Yasuchika Aoki; Junichi Nakamura; Yusuke Matsuura; Takeo Furuya; Masao Koda; Seiji Ohtori
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2016-06-18

4.  Quantitative correlation of lumbar foraminal stenosis with local morphological metrics.

Authors:  Vimal S Gunasekaran; Dustin Hejdak; Benjamin Meyer; Andrew Klein; Kevin Koch
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2021-07-27       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Quantitative evaluation and visualization of lumbar foraminal nerve root entrapment by using diffusion tensor imaging: preliminary results.

Authors:  Y Eguchi; S Ohtori; S Orita; H Kamoda; G Arai; T Ishikawa; M Miyagi; G Inoue; M Suzuki; Y Masuda; H Andou; M Takaso; Y Aoki; T Toyone; A Watanabe; K Takahashi
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2011-09-15       Impact factor: 3.825

6.  Magnetic resonance imaging findings of the lumbar root pathway in patients over 50 years old.

Authors:  K Sasaki
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Clinical and radiological outcomes of unilateral facetectomy and interbody fusion using expandable cages for lumbosacral foraminal stenosis.

Authors:  Jin Hoon Park; Chae Wan Bae; Sang Ryong Jeon; Seung Chul Rhim; Chang Jin Kim; Sung Woo Roh
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2010-12-31

8.  A prospective, masked 18-month minimum follow-up on neurophysiologic changes in persons with spinal stenosis, low back pain, and no symptoms.

Authors:  Andrew J Haig; Karen S J Yamakawa; Christopher Parres; Anthony Chiodo; Henry Tong
Journal:  PM R       Date:  2009-02-03       Impact factor: 2.298

Review 9.  Recent advances in the treatment of low back pain.

Authors:  A Nachemson
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 3.075

10.  A rat model for chronic spinal nerve root compression.

Authors:  Feng Xue; Youzhen Wei; Yongqiang Chen; Yongjun Wang; Lingjun Gao
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-10-19       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.