| Literature DB >> 29927924 |
Sven Van Poucke1, Dana Huskens2, Kurt Van der Speeten3, Mark Roest2, Bart Lauwereins1, Ming-Hua Zheng4, Seppe Dehaene1, Joris Penders5, Abraham Marcus6, Marcus Lancé7.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with hyperthermic intraperitoneal peroperative chemotherapy (HIPEC), indicated for patients with peritoneal metastases from digestive or gynecological malignancies alike, demonstrates a considerable impact on hemostatic metabolism, both on platelet and on coagulation level. The potential hemostatic interference in CRS and HIPEC is phase dependent. The hypothesis of this prospective cohort study is that the procedure exposed an increased thrombotic risk, resulting in a faster and increased thrombin generation and hyper platelet function.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29927924 PMCID: PMC6013150 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0193657
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Effect of HIPEC on laboratory tests, blood gas analysis and ROTEM.
| Before incision | Before Chemo | 30 min chemo | Day 1 | Day 3 | Day7 | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| median | IQR | median | IQR | median | IQR | median | IQR | median | IQR | median | IQR | |
| Hemoglobin (g/dl) | 10.9 | 10.0–12.6 | 10.8 | 9.5–12.4 | 11.1 | 9.3–12.2 | 12.1 | 10.1–12.9 | 9.1–11.9 | 11.1 | 9.9–12.4 | |
| Platelet count (*109/l) | 205 | 165–267 | 196 | 156–238 | 198 | 185–280 | 142–201 | 85–193 | 238 | 123–306 | ||
| WBC (/mm3) | 7.0 | 3.9–8.3 | 6.4–11.7 | 8.0–10.9 | 8.8–12.5 | 6.4 | 5.4–8.5 | 7.0–9.7 | ||||
| Ca2+ (mmol/l) | 4.43 | 4.35–4.51 | 4.14–4.50 | 4.20–4.40 | 4.43 | 4.38–4.58 | 4.65–4.80 | 4.61 | 4.41–4.79 | |||
| Glucose (mg/dl) | 109 | 93–118 | 117–138 | 257–414 | 129–164 | 107–150 | 132–228 | |||||
| pH | 7.35 | 7.34–7.39 | 7.35 | 7.33–7.37 | 7.32–7.35 | 7.38–7.41 | 7.40–7.43 | 7.40–7.45 | ||||
| Lactate (mmol/l) | 0.7 | 0.7–1.0 | 0.7 | 0.6–1.0 | 1.7–4.1 | 1.1–1.9 | 1.0 | 0.7–1.3 | 1.2–2.2 | |||
| aPTT (sec) | 31.6 | 29.3–33.1 | 31.4 | 29.6–33.2 | 31.1 | 29.8–32.5 | 32.0–37.8 | 31.8–36.8 | 31.8 | 29.8–34.9 | ||
| PT (%) | 80 | 69–85 | 76 | 71–84 | 71–78 | 59–74 | 81 | 76–86 | 76 | 66–84 | ||
| INR | 1.15 | 1.10–1.27 | 1.18 | 1.11–1.24 | 1.19 | 1.15–1.23 | 1.21–1.40 | 1.13 | 1.10–1.20 | 1.18 | 1.11–1.31 | |
| Fibrinogen (g/dl) | 366 | 304–411 | 236–358 | 231–335 | 392 | 346–421 | 462–574 | 582–731 | ||||
| EXTEM A5 (mm) | 47 | 41–52 | 37–46 | 38–48 | 45 | 41–51 | 48 | 41–53 | 45–60 | |||
| EXTEM A30 (mm) | 66 | 61–71 | 60–65 | 59–67 | 60–67 | 59–70 | 64–77 | |||||
| EXTEM alpha (°) | 78 | 70–80 | 67–76 | 65–78 | 79 | 74–80 | 78–82 | 78–81 | ||||
| EXTEM CFT (s) | 88 | 68–112 | 81–135 | 80–130 | 84 | 73–103 | 72 | 64–90 | 52–90 | |||
| EXTEM CT (s) | 48 | 45–54 | 49 | 44–67 | 49 | 43–56 | 51 | 48–53 | 48 | 43–54 | 51–67 | |
| EXTEM MCF (mm) | 66 | 61–70 | 60–65 | 59–67 | 61–67 | 66 | 59–70 | 68 | 61–74 | |||
| EXTEM ML (%) | 4 | 3–4 | 4 | 1–6 | 1–3 | 4–10 | 6–13 | 4 | 2–7 | |||
| FIBTEM A5 (mm) | 14 | 11–19 | 8–16 | 7–15 | 13 | 12–18 | 17–22 | 19–27 | ||||
| FIBTEM A30 (mm) | 17 | 14–24 | 10–20 | 9–19 | 17 | 15–23 | 21–28 | 23–33 | ||||
| FIBTEM alpha (°) | 77 | 71–80 | 60–79 | 76 | 70–79 | 76 | 72–81 | 79–82 | 79–81 | |||
| FIBTEM CFT (s) | 297 | 260–560 | 577–1311 | 491–1540 | 270–413 | 320 | 169–736 | 76–437 | ||||
| FIBTEM CT (s) | 49 | 47–51 | 51 | 46–54 | 50 | 47–55 | 49 | 47–54 | 50 | 44–54 | 48–67 | |
| FIBTEM MCF (mm) | 17 | 13–24 | 10–20 | 9–19 | 17 | 14–22 | 21–28 | 24–34 | ||||
| FIBTEM ML (%) | 0 | 0–0 | 0 | 0–0 | 0 | 0–0 | 0–0 | 0–0 | 0–0 | |||
| INTEM A5 (mm) | 52 | 44–56 | 41–50 | 43–53 | 48 | 47–56 | 52 | 42–57 | 50–64 | |||
| INTEM A30 (mm) | 67 | 62–71 | 60–66 | 60–68 | 61–67 | 60–70 | 66–76 | |||||
| INTEM alpha (°) | 79 | 74–80 | 72–78 | 74–79 | 77 | 76–80 | 78–80 | 79–81 | ||||
| INTEM CFT (s) | 59 | 51–86 | 61–90 | 57–92 | 68 | 54–76 | 56 | 49–80 | 44–60 | |||
| INTEM CT (s) | 156 | 149–163 | 149 | 142–180 | 151 | 136–185 | 148 | 143–160 | 148 | 143–162 | 144 | 139–160 |
| INTEM MCF (mm) | 67 | 62–71 | 60–66 | 61–67 | 62–68 | 67 | 60–71 | 67–76 | ||||
| INTEM ML (%) | 3 | 2–4 | 3 | 0–5 | 2 | 1–4 | 4–9 | 5–12 | 4 | 2–6 | ||
Data are presented as median and range. Significant changes compared to before incision values are underlined. IQR interquartile range; WBC white blood cells; aPTT activated partial thromboplastin time; PT prothrombin time; INR international normalized ratio; A5 (30) indicates amplitude at 5 (30) minutes; EXTEM external temogram; FIBTEM fibrinogen temogram; INTEM internal temogram; CFT clot formation time; CT clotting time; MCF maximum clot firmness; ML maximum lysis
Fig 1Effect of HIPEC on platelet function.
TRAP, CRP and ADP were used to activate platelets via PAR-1 (panel A), GPVI (panel B) and P2Y12 receptor (panel C), respectively. Data of αIIbβ3 activation (left) and P-selectin expression (right) are presented as medians with IQR. Significance was tested with the Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed rank test between two consecutive time points, between before incision and 30 minutes after chemotherapy, between day 1 and day 7 and between before incision and day 7. * P<0.05, ** P<0.01.
Effect of HIPEC on platelet function.
| Before incision | Before Chemo | 30 min chemo | Day 1 | Day 3 | Day 7 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| median | median | IQR | median | IQR | median | IQR | median | IQR | median | IQR | |
| αIIbβ3 activation | |||||||||||
| TRAP | 100 | 86 | 70–118 | 61–101 | 49–96 | 42–70 | 25–62 | ||||
| CRP | 100 | 95 | 84–109 | 87 | 74–111 | 78–99 | 59–83 | 63–81 | |||
| ADP | 100 | 83 | 70–104 | 59–90 | 85 | 71–110 | 61–96 | 35–80 | |||
| P-selectin expression | |||||||||||
| TRAP | 100 | 98 | 74–104 | 94 | 70–113 | 82 | 72–94 | 103 | 68–123 | 97 | 69–113 |
| CRP | 100 | 102 | 74–105 | 94 | 74–118 | 76 | 63–98 | 89 | 72–119 | 102 | 71–113 |
| ADP | 100 | 86 | 43–118 | 33–92 | 60 | 29–93 | 103 | 66–177 | 62 | 41–140 | |
Data are presented as percentage of before incision. Significant changes compared to before incision values are underlined. TRAP thrombin receptor activator peptide; CRP collagen related peptide.
Fig 2Effect of HIPEC on thrombin generation.
TG was determined in PPP and, for each patient, ttPeak (TTP), thrombin peak (TP) and ETP values of the resulting thrombograms were calculated. Data are presented as median with IQR. Significance was tested with the Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed rank test between two consecutive time points, between before incision and 30 minutes after chemotherapy, between day 1 and day 7 and between before incision and day 7. * P<0.05, ** P<0.01, *** P<0.001.
Effect of HIPEC on thrombin generation.
| Before incision | Before chemotherapy | 30 min chemotherapy | Day 1 | Day 3 | Day7 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| median | median | IQR | median | IQR | median | IQR | median | IQR | median | IQR | |
| LT | 100 | 72–96 | 69–87 | 86 | 77–116 | 106 | 84–144 | 125–186 | |||
| ETP | 100 | 100 | 84–131 | 100–130 | 115 | 86–137 | 103 | 84–119 | 93 | 70–109 | |
| TP | 100 | 111 | 84–156 | 99–161 | 113–224 | 121 | 75–206 | 113 | 69–175 | ||
| TTP | 100 | 80–100 | 73–92 | 71–101 | 97 | 77–122 | 109–135 | ||||
Data are presented as percentage of before incision. Significant changes compared to before incision values are underlined. LT lag time; TTP time-to-thrombin peak; ETP endogenous thrombin potential; TP thrombin peak.