Xiaobang Hu1, Isador H Lieberman2. 1. Scoliosis and Spine Tumor Center, Texas Back Institute, Texas Health Presbyterian Hospital, 6020 W. Parker Rd., Ste. 200a, Plano, TX, 75093, USA. 2. Scoliosis and Spine Tumor Center, Texas Back Institute, Texas Health Presbyterian Hospital, 6020 W. Parker Rd., Ste. 200a, Plano, TX, 75093, USA. ilieberman@texasback.com.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To examine the incidence of occult infection in revision spine surgeries and its correlation with preoperative inflammatory markers. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed all patients who underwent revision spine surgery and hardware removal between 2010 and 2016. Patients who had preoperative clinical signs of infection were excluded. The hardware and surrounding tissue culture results were obtained. The patients' diagnosis and preoperative inflammatory marker (ESR, CRP, and procalcitonin) levels were recorded. RESULTS: A total of 162 consecutive patients were included in this study. The patients' mean age was 61 years (range 14-88). One hundred and three patients (63.6%) were female. Seventy-two patients (44.4%) had loose hardware and 88 patients (54.3%) had pseudarthrosis. Postoperatively, the hardware and/or surrounding tissue culture was positive in 15 patients (9.3%). The most commonly identified organisms were Propionibacterium acnes (7/15, 46.7%) and Staphylococcus (6/15, 40.0%). The other identified organisms were Pseudomonas aeruginosa (1/15, 6.7%) and Serratia marcescens (1/15, 6.7%). Only four patients with positive cultures had elevated preoperative ESR and CRP levels. Only two patients with positive cultures had elevated preoperative procalcitonin levels. There is no correlation between the patients' preoperative ESR, CRP, procalcitonin levels, and positive culture results (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Our study shows that occult infections are present in 9.3% of patients who underwent revision spine surgery and hardware removal although they did not have clinical signs of infection. Those commonly used preoperative inflammatory markers such as ESR, CRP, and procalcitonin may not be sensitive enough to detect occult infections in these patients. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.
PURPOSE: To examine the incidence of occult infection in revision spine surgeries and its correlation with preoperative inflammatory markers. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed all patients who underwent revision spine surgery and hardware removal between 2010 and 2016. Patients who had preoperative clinical signs of infection were excluded. The hardware and surrounding tissue culture results were obtained. The patients' diagnosis and preoperative inflammatory marker (ESR, CRP, and procalcitonin) levels were recorded. RESULTS: A total of 162 consecutive patients were included in this study. The patients' mean age was 61 years (range 14-88). One hundred and three patients (63.6%) were female. Seventy-two patients (44.4%) had loose hardware and 88 patients (54.3%) had pseudarthrosis. Postoperatively, the hardware and/or surrounding tissue culture was positive in 15 patients (9.3%). The most commonly identified organisms were Propionibacterium acnes (7/15, 46.7%) and Staphylococcus (6/15, 40.0%). The other identified organisms were Pseudomonas aeruginosa (1/15, 6.7%) and Serratia marcescens (1/15, 6.7%). Only four patients with positive cultures had elevated preoperative ESR and CRP levels. Only two patients with positive cultures had elevated preoperative procalcitonin levels. There is no correlation between the patients' preoperative ESR, CRP, procalcitonin levels, and positive culture results (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Our study shows that occult infections are present in 9.3% of patients who underwent revision spine surgery and hardware removal although they did not have clinical signs of infection. Those commonly used preoperative inflammatory markers such as ESR, CRP, and procalcitonin may not be sensitive enough to detect occult infections in these patients. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.
Entities:
Keywords:
Hardware; Inflammatory marker; Occult infection; Propionibacterium acnes; Revision surgery
Authors: Kaisorn L Chaichana; Mohamad Bydon; David R Santiago-Dieppa; Lee Hwang; Gregory McLoughlin; Daniel M Sciubba; Jean-Paul Wolinsky; Ali Bydon; Ziya L Gokaslan; Timothy Witham Journal: J Neurosurg Spine Date: 2013-11-08
Authors: Varun Puvanesarajah; Francis H Shen; Jourdan M Cancienne; Wendy M Novicoff; Amit Jain; Adam L Shimer; Hamid Hassanzadeh Journal: J Neurosurg Spine Date: 2016-05-06
Authors: I Uçkay; A Dinh; L Vauthey; N Asseray; N Passuti; M Rottman; J Biziragusenyuka; A Riché; P Rohner; D Wendling; S Mammou; R Stern; P Hoffmeyer; L Bernard Journal: Clin Microbiol Infect Date: 2009-06-06 Impact factor: 8.067
Authors: Pascale Bémer; S Corvec; S Tariel; N Asseray; D Boutoille; C Langlois; B Tequi; H Drugeon; N Passuti; S Touchais Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 2008-12-15 Impact factor: 3.468
Authors: James M Mok; Jordan M Cloyd; David S Bradford; Serena S Hu; Vedat Deviren; Jason A Smith; Bobby Tay; Sigurd H Berven Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 2009-04-15 Impact factor: 3.468
Authors: Michael P Kelly; Lawrence G Lenke; Keith H Bridwell; Rashmi Agarwal; Jakub Godzik; Linda Koester Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 2013-09-01 Impact factor: 3.468
Authors: Mark A Pichelmann; Lawrence G Lenke; Keith H Bridwell; Christopher R Good; Patrick T O'Leary; Brenda A Sides Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 2010-01-15 Impact factor: 3.468
Authors: Aakash Agarwal; Boren Lin; Jeffrey C Wang; Christian Schultz; Steve R Garfin; Vijay K Goel; Neel Anand; Anand K Agarwal Journal: Global Spine J Date: 2018-06-12