Literature DB >> 24206038

Risk of infection following posterior instrumented lumbar fusion for degenerative spine disease in 817 consecutive cases.

Kaisorn L Chaichana1, Mohamad Bydon, David R Santiago-Dieppa, Lee Hwang, Gregory McLoughlin, Daniel M Sciubba, Jean-Paul Wolinsky, Ali Bydon, Ziya L Gokaslan, Timothy Witham.   

Abstract

OBJECT: Posterior lumbar spinal fusion for degenerative spine disease is a common procedure, and its use is increasing annually. The rate of infection, as well as the factors associated with an increased risk of infection, remains unclear for this patient population. A better understanding of these features may help guide treatment strategies aimed at minimizing infection for this relatively common procedure. The authors' goals were therefore to ascertain the incidence of postoperative spinal infections and identify factors associated with postoperative spinal infections.
METHODS: Data obtained in adult patients who underwent instrumented posterior lumbar fusion for degenerative spine disease between 1993 and 2010 were retrospectively reviewed. Stepwise multivariate proportional hazards regression analysis was used to identify factors associated with infection. Variables with p < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.
RESULTS: During the study period, 817 consecutive patients underwent lumbar fusion for degenerative spine disease, and 37 patients (4.5%) developed postoperative spine infection at a median of 0.6 months (IQR 0.3-0.9). The factors independently associated with an increased risk of infection were increasing age (RR 1.004 [95% CI 1.001-1.009], p = 0.049), diabetes (RR 5.583 [95% CI 1.322-19.737], p = 0.02), obesity (RR 6.216 [95% CI 1.832-9.338], p = 0.005), previous spine surgery (RR 2.994 [95% CI 1.263-9.346], p = 0.009), and increasing duration of hospital stay (RR 1.155 [95% CI 1.076-1.230], p = 0.003). Of the 37 patients in whom infection developed, 21 (57%) required operative intervention but only 3 (8%) required instrumentation removal as part of their infection management.
CONCLUSIONS: This study identifies that several factors--older age, diabetes, obesity, prior spine surgery, and length of hospital stay--were each independently associated with an increased risk of developing infection among patients undergoing instrumented lumbar fusion for degenerative spine disease. The overwhelming majority of these patients were treated effectively without hardware removal.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24206038     DOI: 10.3171/2013.10.SPINE1364

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine        ISSN: 1547-5646


  34 in total

1.  [Spinal column: implants and revisions].

Authors:  S M Krieg; H S Meyer; B Meyer
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 0.955

2.  [Risk factors for surgical site infection following posterior lumbar intervertebral fusion].

Authors:  Chaohui Sang; Hailong Ren; Zhandong Meng; Jianming Jiang
Journal:  Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao       Date:  2018-07-30

3.  Effects of Negative Pressure Wound Therapy on Wound Dehiscence and Surgical Site Infection Following Instrumented Spinal Fusion Surgery-A Single Surgeon's Experience.

Authors:  Ryan M Naylor; Hannah E Gilder; Nikita Gupta; Thomas C Hydrick; Joshua R Labott; David J Mauler; Taylor P Trentadue; Brandon Ghislain; Benjamin D Elder; Jeremy L Fogelson
Journal:  World Neurosurg       Date:  2020-01-28       Impact factor: 2.104

4.  Revision spine surgery in patients without clinical signs of infection: How often are there occult infections in removed hardware?

Authors:  Xiaobang Hu; Isador H Lieberman
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-06-20       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Risk factors for deep surgical site infection following posterior instrumented fusion for degenerative diseases in the thoracic and/or lumbar spine: a multicenter, observational cohort study of 2913 consecutive cases.

Authors:  Satoshi Ogihara; Takashi Yamazaki; Michio Shiibashi; Hirotaka Chikuda; Toru Maruyama; Kota Miyoshi; Hirohiko Inanami; Yasushi Oshima; Seiichi Azuma; Naohiro Kawamura; Kiyofumi Yamakawa; Nobuhiro Hara; Jiro Morii; Rentaro Okazaki; Yujiro Takeshita; Sakae Tanaka; Kazuo Saita
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2021-01-29       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  A prediction model of surgical site infection after instrumented thoracolumbar spine surgery in adults.

Authors:  Daniël M C Janssen; Sander M J van Kuijk; Boudewijn d'Aumerie; Paul Willems
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2019-01-07       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  What are the risk factors for surgical site infection after spinal fusion? A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sebastien Pesenti; Tejbir Pannu; Jessica Andres-Bergos; Renaud Lafage; Justin S Smith; Steve Glassman; Marinus de Kleuver; Ferran Pellise; Frank Schwab; Virginie Lafage
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-08-20       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Microbiologic profile of infections in presumed aseptic revision spine surgery.

Authors:  Grant D Shifflett; Benjamin T Bjerke-Kroll; Benedict U Nwachukwu; Janina Kueper; Jayme Burket; Andrew A Sama; Federico P Girardi; Frank P Cammisa; Alexander P Hughes
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-03-29       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Is dental prophylaxis required following spinal fusion?-a systematic review and call for evidence.

Authors:  Parker Martin; Rajbir Hundal; Kathryn Matulich; Maria Porta; Rakesh Patel; Ilyas Aleem
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2020-03

10.  Comparison of Surgical Outcome Between Diabetic Versus Nondiabetic Patients After Lumbar Fusion.

Authors:  Keisan Moazzeni; Kasra Amin Kazemi; Ramin Khanmohammad; Mohammad Eslamian; Mohsen Rostami; Morteza Faghih-Jouibari
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2018-08-31
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.