| Literature DB >> 29925397 |
Adrienne E Campbell-Washburn1, Toby Rogers2, Annette M Stine2, Jaffar M Khan2, Rajiv Ramasawmy2, William H Schenke2, Delaney R McGuirt2, Jonathan R Mazal2, Laurie P Grant2, Elena K Grant2, Daniel A Herzka2, Robert J Lederman2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) fluoroscopy allows for simultaneous measurement of cardiac function, flow and chamber pressure during diagnostic heart catheterization. To date, commercial metallic guidewires were considered contraindicated during CMR fluoroscopy due to concerns over radiofrequency (RF)-induced heating. The inability to use metallic guidewires hampers catheter navigation in patients with challenging anatomy. Here we use low specific absorption rate (SAR) imaging from gradient echo spiral acquisitions and a commercial nitinol guidewire for CMR fluoroscopy right heart catheterization in patients.Entities:
Keywords: Cardiac catheters; Cardiovascular magnetic resonance; Guidewire; Interventional MRI catheterization; Invasive hemodynamics; Medical device heating; Real-time MRI; Right heart catheterization; Spiral MRI
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29925397 PMCID: PMC6011242 DOI: 10.1186/s12968-018-0458-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Cardiovasc Magn Reson ISSN: 1097-6647 Impact factor: 5.364
Guidewire configurations tested during in vitro experiments. Experiments were performed in the ASTM-2182 phantom using Terumo Glidewires and Medtronic Nitrex in a 70 cm bore 1.5 T MRI system (Aera, Siemens, Erlangen, Germany)
| Property | Experimental details | Maximum Heating Condition |
|---|---|---|
| Catheter insulation | • Heating at guidewire tip and catheter tip were measured simultaneously | • 1 cm guidewire extension; the change in insulation is similar to that of an exposed metallic tip. |
| Guidewire Length | • Terumo | • 260 cm guidewire for Terumo |
| Guidewire position | • The temperature distribution of this phantom with this CMR system has been mapped previously [ | • Positioned near the edge of the bore (> 12 cm off-isocenter) and near the surface of the gel (> 5 cm depth). |
| Insertion length | • Insertion lengths 15-65 cm into the ASTM gel phantom were tested for the three lengths of Terumo | • 45 cm–55 cm insertion length for all guidewire lengths. |
| Looping | • Loops were created in segments of bare wire, as is common in the body, in the coronal plane | • Temperature was always higher at the guidewire tip compared to the loop contact point and temperature in both locations increased with increasing number of loops. |
Factors that modulate guidewire heating during CMR
| Factor | Heating Impact | How to reduce heating |
|---|---|---|
| CMR excitation energy | ||
| Radiofrequency excitation, controlled via flip angle α | Heating increases with square of flip angle, α [ | Reduce α during CMR fluoroscopy |
| Radiofrequency pulse width duration | Heating decreases linearly with RF pulse width duration | Increase radio frequenchy pulse width duration |
| Radiofrequency duty cycle | Heating decreases linearly with excitation repetition time (TR) | Prolong TR |
| Radiofrequency pre-pulses used for CMR magnetization preparation | Heating increases with pre-pulse flip angle and number of RF pulses in preparation, and decreases with RF pulse width duration | Reduce pre-pulses and their SAR characteristics |
| CMR scanner duty cycle | Additional heat is generated as long as CMR scanning continues | Limit duration of continuous CMR fluoroscopy with a guidewire in place. |
| Conductive guidewire physical properties | ||
| Guidewire insulation | Insulation gaps, such as at the tip, concentrate current density and increase focal heating [ | Use guidewires that are fully insulated without gaps |
| Length of conductive materials | Guidewire length > ¼ wavelength λ of the Larmor frequency in vivo (~ 10 cm at 1.5 T) promotes standing waves and therefore heating [ | Use guidewires having metallic components shorter than ¼λ (not available commercially) |
| Guidewire configuration | ||
| Guidewire position with regard to center of CMR bore | Electrical field minimal at the center of scanner bore (in x & y), greatest closer to wall of scanner bore [ | Keep guidewire close to scanner centerline and away from walls of scanner. |
| Guidewire position with regard to patient body | Electrical field is greatest at outer (skin) surface of body. Electrical modeling suggests electrical field is greatest at groin and shoulder during CMR | Use in central blood vessels |
| Guidewire insertion length with regard to vascular access site | Electrical field is highest at outer edges of scanner bore entrance. Guidewire outside of the body is more likely to couple electrically and heat. In other words, minimal guidewire vascular insertion length is associated with maximal heating | Reduce input energy during scanning. |
| Guidewire insulation by catheter | The patient is less exposed to guidewire heating when it is covered by insulating catheter | If guidewire is not in active use, retain its position inside catheter or remove from body during CMR. |
| Guidewire protrusion length from catheter | A change in insulation with minimum guidewire protrusion outside insulating catheters causes concentration of current density and therefore heating | Reduce input energy during scanning. |
| Guidewire length | Different guidewire lengths are associated with different degrees of heating, in a non-linear fashion, relating to coupling with scanner electrical field [ | Select guidewire lengths empirically associated with less heating. |
| Guidewire diameter | Guidewires with smaller diameter generate more heating [ | Select larger diameter guidewires as appropriate |
| Guidewire loops overlapping | Guidewire looping can create a second point of heating at wire contact points, which remains less than or equal to guidewire tip heating | Reduce input energy during scanning. |
| Guidewire heat is dissipated by conduction and convection into surrounding medium | Blood flow cools heated guidewire dramatically. Testing under static conditions, such as ASTM 2182 phantom, maximizes detected heating | Static phantom testing exaggerates heating to provide a margin of safety predicted in vivo, probably by 10-fold. |
Fig. 1Heating of guidewires. Temperature at the tip of the fully insulated guidewire (Terumo Glidewire) (a) and uninsulated tip guidewire (Medtronic Nitrex) (b) during 2 min of continuous scanning (low-SAR and normal-SAR) in the ASTM 2182 phantom with homebuilt positioning system
CMR Catheterization Findings
| Measurement | Value |
|---|---|
| Heart rate (bpm) | 71 ± 10 |
| Right atrial pressure (mm Hg) | 9 ± 2 |
| Right ventricular pressure (mm Hg) | 42 ± 14 / 10 ± 5 |
| Pulmonary artery mean / wedge pressure (mm Hg) | 25 ± 9 / 12 ± 7 |
| Aorta systolic/diastolic/mean pressure (mm Hg) | 124 ± 19 / 67 ± 7 / 87 ± 9 |
| Right atrium volume index (mL/m2) | 14 ± 5 |
| Right ventricular end-diastolic volume index / end-systolic (mL/m2) / ejection fraction | 87 ± 37 / 35 ± 15 / 59 ± 5 |
| Left atrial volume index (mL/m2) | 40 ± 11 |
| Left ventricular end-diastolic volume index / end-systolic (mL/m2) / ejection fraction | 69 ± 6 / 26 ± 4 / 62 ± 6 |
| Left ventricular mass index | 54 ± 36 |
| QP / QS / Ratio | 3.6 ± 1.2 / 2.9 ± 0.9 / 1.3 ± .5 |
Likert-type scoring of device visibility and confidence in catheter and guidewire position. Only catheter shaft visibility reached statistical significance (p = 0.001)
| Imaging test | Guidewire low-SAR spiral GRE | No guidewire normal-SAR rectilinear bSSFP |
|---|---|---|
| Tip visibility of balloon catheter with saturation pre-pulse(scale 0–3) | 3.0 ± 0.2 | 2.9 ± 0.3 |
| Shaft visibility of balloon catheter (scale 0–3) | 1.1 ± 1.2 | 0.0 ± 0.0 |
| Confidence that balloon catheter tip is at the intended location (scale 0–2) | 2.0 ± 0.0 | 2.0 ± 0.0 |
| Tip visibility of guidewire (scale 0–3) | 0.5 ± 0.8 | N/A |
| Shaft visibility of guidewire (scale 0–3) | 1.6 ± 1.1 | N/A |
| Confidence that guidewire tip is at the intended location (scale 0–2) | 0.4 ± 0.6 | N/A |
Fig. 2Catheter shaft conspicuity imparted by guidewire. Example low-SAR spiral GRE images, with catheter and guidewire (arrowheads) positioned in the superior vena cava (a), main pulmonary artery (b) and left pulmonary artery (c); the guidewire imparts both hypo- and hyper-intense signal along the shaft. The dotted line indicates signal saturation caused by an orthogonal slice plane interleaved during imaging
Fig. 3Comparator rectilinear bSSFP images. Image orientation comparable to Fig. 2 showing improved blood-tissue contrast with bSSFP rectilinear images (normal-SAR imaging mode) for inferior/superior vena cava view (a), main pulmonary artery view (b) and branched pulmonary arteries view (c). No devices were present during imaging