| Literature DB >> 29925225 |
Fanxing Xu1,2, Bosai He3, Feng Xiao3, Tingxu Yan4, Kaishun Bi5, Ying Jia3, Zhenzhong Wang1.
Abstract
Previous studies have shown that spinosin was implicated in the modulation of sedation and hypnosis, while its effects on learning and memory deficits were rarely reported. The aim of this study is to investigate the effects of spinosin on the improvement of cognitive impairment in model mice with Alzheimer's disease (AD) induced by Aβ₁₋₄₂ and determine the underlying mechanism. Spontaneous locomotion assessment and Morris water maze test were performed to investigate the impact of spinosin on behavioral activities, and the pathological changes were assayed by biochemical analyses and histological assay. After 7 days of intracerebroventricular (ICV) administration of spinosin (100 µg/kg/day), the cognitive impairment of mice induced by Aβ₁₋₄₂ was significantly attenuated. Moreover, spinosin treatment effectively decreased the level of malondialdehyde (MDA) and Aβ₁₋₄₂ accumulation in hippocampus. Aβ₁₋₄₂ induced alterations in the expression of brain derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) and B-cell lymphoma-2 (Bcl-2), as well as inflammatory response in brain were also reversed by spinosin treatment. These results indicated that the ameliorating effect of spinosin on cognitive impairment might be mediated through the regulation of oxidative stress, inflammatory process, apoptotic program and neurotrophic factor expression, suggesting that spinosin might be beneficial to treat learning and memory deficits in patients with AD via multi-targets.Entities:
Keywords: Alzheimer’s disease; Neuroprotection; Semen Ziziphi spinosae; Spinosin
Year: 2019 PMID: 29925225 PMCID: PMC6319550 DOI: 10.4062/biomolther.2018.051
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomol Ther (Seoul) ISSN: 1976-9148 Impact factor: 4.634
Fig. 1.Schematic representation of the experimental design (A), and locomotor activity of mice in each group (B). Values are means ± SD (n=10).
Fig. 2.Effects of spinosin on escape latency in the training sessions (A), and search strategy (B) and swimming time in target quadrant in probe trail sessions (C) of the Morris water maze test. Values are means ± SD (n=10). #p<0.05 and ##p<0.01 compared with control group; **p<0.01 compared with Aβ1–42 group.
Fig. 3.Effect of spinosin on MDA and Aβ1–42 levels in the hippocampus of Aβ1–42 injected mice. Values are mean ± SD (n=6). ##p< 0.01 compared with control group; *p<0.05 and **p<0.01 compared with Aβ1–42 group.
Fig. 4.Effect of spinosin on the protein expression levels of BNDF in hippocampus (A) and cortex (B) of Aβ1–42 injected mice. Values are mean ± SD (n=6). ##p<0.01 compared with control group; **p<0.01 compared with Aβ1–42 group.
Fig. 5.Effect of spinosin on the protein expression levels of Bcl-2 in hippocampus (A) and cortex (B) of Aβ1–42 injected mice. Values are mean ± SEM (n=6). ##p<0.01 compared with control group; *p<0.05 compared with Aβ1–42 group; **p<0.01 compared with Aβ1–42 group.
Fig. 6.Effect of spinosin on the protein level of IL-6 in hippocampus (A) and cortex (B) of Aβ1–42 injected mice. Values are mean ± SD (n=6). ##p<0.01 compared with control group; **p<0.01 compared with Aβ1–42 group.
Fig. 7.Histopathological changes of neurons in hippocampus of mice after Aβ1–42 injection. Representative images of neurons in hippocampal CA1 region of mice from control, Aβ1–42, Aβ1–42+10 μg/kg spinosin, and Aβ1–42+100 μg/kg spinosin groups. The arrows indicated neuronal degeneration of hippocampal CA1 region.